It a good point especially now that the popularity of OpenJDK is soaring and
more and more ports are being done.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:15 PM, kevin diggs wrote:
> The section of the page:
>
> http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/
>
> for downloading has a heading that says:
>
> Linux platfo
AFAIK there isa PowerPC version of RHEL and the IcedTea flavor of OpenJDK
likely runs on that.
Hi Kelly,
Logic looks fine, just a nit
Unless $(NONFCS_BUILD_INFO) really needs that leading "-", I'd remove it
and add a "-" in line 110 and 297 below. Makes it a bit more readable
Dave
hotspot/make/defs.make
109 else
110 HOTSPOT_BUILD_VERSION=internal$(NONFCS_BUI
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> These blogs might help explain things:
> http://blogs.sun.com/kto/entry/anatomy_of_the_jdk_build
> http://blogs.sun.com/jjg/entry/building_javac_for_jdk7
>
Thanks for the links. I'll look at these later. If they answer the
foll
Kevin,
These blogs might help explain things:
http://blogs.sun.com/kto/entry/anatomy_of_the_jdk_build
http://blogs.sun.com/jjg/entry/building_javac_for_jdk7
In jdk7/hotspot the BOOT jdk is used to do javac compilers, for some
serviceability tools,
but that should probably be changed to u
Hi,
The FAQ link at the bottom of page:
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/
is dead???
kevin
On Nov 24, 2010, at 6:06 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Kelly O'Hair said the following on 11/25/10 11:38:
On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:08 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Ok. So why not just USER_BUILD_INFO or CUSTOM_BUILD_INFO ? There's
really no tie to "FCS" or not. In fact why not use
USER_RELEASE_SUFFIX - s
The section of the page:
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/
for downloading has a heading that says:
Linux platform
If this is for x86 only then please label it as such (more than having
i586 buried in the file/link name).
Linux actually runs on quite a lot of different hardware (I got me
kevin diggs said the following on 11/25/10 11:43:
Is there any way to build this thing on a Linux PowerPC box (YDL 4.0 &
6.0). Is there a snowballs's chance in some place hot that GCC gcj
will work?
I admit that I have not done an extensive search for a PowerPC Linux
jdk (May actually be one on
Kelly O'Hair said the following on 11/25/10 11:38:
On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:08 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Ok. So why not just USER_BUILD_INFO or CUSTOM_BUILD_INFO ? There's
really no tie to "FCS" or not. In fact why not use USER_RELEASE_SUFFIX
- see below ..
It's just a name, but we were looking fo
Hi,
Is there any way to build this thing on a Linux PowerPC box (YDL 4.0 &
6.0). Is there a snowballs's chance in some place hot that GCC gcj
will work?
I admit that I have not done an extensive search for a PowerPC Linux
jdk (May actually be one on one of the install CDs but I doubt it).
Maybe o
On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:08 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Kelly O'Hair said the following on 11/25/10 09:55:
On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:47 PM, David Holmes wrote:
John Coomes said the following on 11/25/10 09:16:
Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote:
Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
Try this:
http
Kelly O'Hair said the following on 11/25/10 09:55:
On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:47 PM, David Holmes wrote:
John Coomes said the following on 11/25/10 09:16:
Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote:
Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
Try this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-ver
On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:47 PM, David Holmes wrote:
John Coomes said the following on 11/25/10 09:16:
Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote:
Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
Try this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
Sorry about that.
Aren't we using the
John Coomes said the following on 11/25/10 09:16:
Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote:
Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
Try this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
Sorry about that.
Aren't we using the term GA (general availability) instead of FCS
the
On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:16 PM, John Coomes wrote:
Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote:
Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
Try this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
Sorry about that.
Aren't we using the term GA (general availability) instead of FCS
thes
Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote:
> Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
>
> Try this:
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
>
> Sorry about that.
Aren't we using the term GA (general availability) instead of FCS
these days?
Aside from that, looks fine.
-J
Suggestion accepted. Thanks.
Check http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
I also found a few additional places to correct information on
HOTSPOT_BUILD_VERSION.
If this looks ok I'll build on all systems and see how it looks.
-kto
On Nov 24, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Da
On Nov 24, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 11:36 Wed 24 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
Try this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
Sorry about that.
Looks ok to me.
I assume the motivation is so that MILES
I finally got the build done with Fedora 14!
Thanks all your hints.
On 11:36 Wed 24 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
>
> Try this:
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
>
> Sorry about that.
>
Looks ok to me.
I assume the motivation is so that MILESTONE doesn't have to be duplicated
in setting JPRT
Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
Try this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
Sorry about that.
-kto
On Nov 24, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 11:19 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I need a reviewer for this change:
6987107: Add NONF
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 11:19 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I need a reviewer for this change:
>
> 6987107: Add NONFCS_BUILD_INFO variable to add to but not modify
> MILESTONE in version string
> http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ohair/webrevs/jdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
Bit hard to review if the host
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:50 -0800, Joe Wang wrote:
> Sorry Mark, and all on build-dev. I didn't pay attention to the
> build-dev, I mean didn't realize the original email was sent to an
> outside alias. It's my fault. My notice was ONLY a heads-up for Kelly. I
> shouldn't have hit reply to all.
I need a reviewer for this change:
6987107: Add NONFCS_BUILD_INFO variable to add to but not modify
MILESTONE in version string
http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ohair/webrevs/jdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
It removed use of JPRT_BUILD_VERSION, adds a more generic
NONFCS_BUILD_INFO.
Also optimiz
Sorry Mark, and all on build-dev. I didn't pay attention to the
build-dev, I mean didn't realize the original email was sent to an
outside alias. It's my fault. My notice was ONLY a heads-up for Kelly. I
shouldn't have hit reply to all. Please disregard my previous email.
Thanks,
Joe
On 11/24
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:20 -0800, Joe Wang wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 10:13 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Joe Wang wrote:
> >> By the way, we just finalized a plan on jaxp 1.4.5. We are planning
> >> make an internal release first by FF (12/15) of JDK7, to give you so
> >
It's already in the JDK7 PRD [1]. Also, there is no API changes, just
some Apache update and bug fixes required by the exit criteria.
[1]
http://wiki.se.oracle.com/display/JPG/JDK+7+Engineering+Feature+Plans+Overview
--Joe
On 11/24/2010 10:13 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Ok. I assume we need some
Ok. I assume we need some kind of approval to add this to jdk7? Might
want to get that ball rolling if it isn't already.
Or any CCC request that might be needed.
-kto
On Nov 24, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Joe Wang wrote:
Kelly,
By the way, we just finalized a plan on jaxp 1.4.5. We are planning
m
Kelly,
By the way, we just finalized a plan on jaxp 1.4.5. We are planning make
an internal release first by FF (12/15) of JDK7, to give you so me time
to prepare for the integration, we've set 12/8 as the date by which I
will provide a source bundle. After that, I will continue working on
so
I can confirm the URLs for jaxp are correct. Yes, the file
jaxp-1_4_4.zip and jaxp-unittests-1_4_4.zip only exist in the jdk7
download area, so both openjdk6 and openjdk7 refer to that same bundles.
By the way, I'm asking around about using download.java.net/jaxp to hold
jaxp artifacts in the
31 matches
Mail list logo
