Re: Need reviewers and comments: 6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install image

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > > Need reviewers and comments: >  6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install image >  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk_release/webrev/ > > With JDK6 Updates we purposely resisted many rebranding changes

Re: Need reviewers and comments: 6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install image

On Nov 29, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote: Is there a reason why Mac OS X is not listed on the list of platforms? Has something official not been done yet? Aren't Apple and Oracle making nice-nice about the fact that OpenJDK will be there for Mac OS X? I suspect this will take time,

jaxp 1.4.5 and jdk7 integration

Hi Mark, Sure, in the future, I will send updated information about JAXP to the alias. The plan for JDK7-JAXP is to include the following: - all of the P1-P3 bug reports with a few exceptions, - all of the blockers, critical issues, as well as some of the major and minor bug fixes from Apache

Re: Need reviewers and comments: 6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install image

Is there a reason why Mac OS X is not listed on the list of platforms? Has something official not been done yet? Aren't Apple and Oracle making nice-nice about the fact that OpenJDK will be there for Mac OS X? Perhaps I am not seeing the role of the information in this file. It seems to be see

Need reviewers and comments: 6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install image

Need reviewers and comments: 6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install image http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk_release/webrev/ With JDK6 Updates we purposely resisted many rebranding changes that could impacted customers, however at one point we

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

On 15:08 Mon 29 Nov , Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > > On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > >> Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyone use the binary plugs for > >> anything. > >> Certainly neither regular OpenJDK builds nor IcedTea bui

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

On 11/28/2010 5:52 PM, Lussier, Denis wrote: Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't use Iced Tea?? No. The binary plugs have not been required for an out-of-the-box OpenJDK 6 build since b07: "OpenJDK 6: Sources for b07 and b08 published" http://b

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 20:52 -0500, Lussier, Denis wrote: > Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't > use Iced Tea?? I know I had to set them up in the OpenSCG build farm for > Windoze and Linux, last year when I started with Build 16, and they are > still there

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyone use the binary plugs for >> anything. >> Certainly neither regular OpenJDK builds nor IcedTea builds do. So if they >> just serve >> to confuse people to a

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

On 11/29/10 2:52 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote: > Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't > use Iced Tea?? No. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192 Oracle J