Kelly O'Hair said the following on 12/23/10 11:51:
Need reviewer: OpenJDK7 binary plug logic removal
7008723: Remove binary plugs creation and use from openjdk
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-plug-removal/webrev/
Looks nicely eradicated to me. Surprised how far it's tenta
Need reviewer: OpenJDK7 binary plug logic removal
7008723: Remove binary plugs creation and use from openjdk
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-plug-removal/webrev/
-kto
On 14:19 Wed 22 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 16:29 Tue 21 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >> I'm back with another stab at a webrev and modified proposal.
> >>
> >> 6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in th
On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 16:29 Tue 21 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I'm back with another stab at a webrev and modified proposal.
6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install
image
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-bui
Changeset: dc9eb519c6ed
Author:ohair
Date: 2010-12-22 12:25 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/rev/dc9eb519c6ed
7003845: README-builds document proper location of forest extension, provide
alternatives
Reviewed-by: robilad
! README
! README-builds.html
+ get_source.s
On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
On 12/20/10 9:53 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I'm proposing adding that script to the make/scripts directory and
also provide an easy 'get-source.sh'
script for people to get the entire forest and avoid a hard
dependence on the Forest Extension
On 16:29 Tue 21 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I'm back with another stab at a webrev and modified proposal.
>
> 6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install
> image
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-eclipse/webrev/
>
> The above change creates a
On 12/20/10 9:53 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> I'm proposing adding that script to the make/scripts directory and also
> provide an easy 'get-source.sh'
> script for people to get the entire forest and avoid a hard dependence on the
> Forest Extension.
Sounds good to me (for the parallel hg pull,
On 12/20/10 10:17 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Our main problem with forests is that the forest extension appears to no
> longer be a part of the official Hg distribution
Technically, it never was part of it. Hgforest was hosted on hg.akoha.org, then
forked on bitbucket by
hgforest-crew (that's th
