Re: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

2011-04-29 Thread luxInteg
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 09:15:22 Julien Ponge wrote: > The company behind cmake is apparently really helpful. When KDE switched to > cmake, they helped a lot and developed new features to fulfill the > specific requirements KDE had. With the big names backing OpenJDK, I am > pretty sure that the t

Re: Request for review: 7036525 Disable alternative source mechanism for OPENJDK builds

2011-04-29 Thread John Coomes
David Holmes (david.hol...@oracle.com) wrote: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/7036525/webrev/ > > Simple but crude. If OPENJDK is defined then the Hotspot "alternative > source" mechanism is effectively disabled by checking for a non-existent > path. This allows people using the alt-src me

(Fwd) review request (S): 7037250 cscope.make is silently broken

2011-04-29 Thread John Coomes
Mea culpa, forgot to ask for permission, so am asking for forgiveness instead. This makefile change has been pushed to the hotspot-gc repo. It has no effect on the product, simply fixes cscope database generation. -John --- start of forwarded message --- From: John Coomes To: hotspot-g

Re: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

2011-04-29 Thread Steve Poole
On 26/04/11 15:54, Kelly O'Hair wrote: On Apr 26, 2011, at 12:59 AM, Steve Poole wrote: * Allow for use of more portable build tools (compilers etc.) where possible Can I add support for alternative JVM's ? Seems a bit out of scope to me. Sorry, it was a bit of a flippant one line

Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-04-29 Thread Omair Majid
Hi, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/gcc-46-support/ The patch adds support for building hotspot with gcc 4.6. gcc 4.6 changed how arguments are handled. It now treats -export-dynamic as it treats any other -efoo option: it thinks xport-dynamic is the entry point and passes this inf

Re: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

2011-04-29 Thread Kelly O'Hair
On Apr 29, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Steve Poole wrote: > On 26/04/11 15:54, Kelly O'Hair wrote: >> >> >> On Apr 26, 2011, at 12:59 AM, Steve Poole wrote: >> > > * Allow for use of more portable build tools (compilers etc.) where > possible >>>Can I add support for alternative JVM'

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-04-29 Thread David Katleman
Hi Omair! On 4/29/2011 3:59 PM, Omair Majid wrote: Hi, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/gcc-46-support/ The patch adds support for building hotspot with gcc 4.6. gcc 4.6 changed how arguments are handled. It now treats -export-dynamic as it treats any other -efoo option: it thinks

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-04-29 Thread Omair Majid
On 04/29/2011 07:13 PM, David Katleman wrote: Hi Omair! On 4/29/2011 3:59 PM, Omair Majid wrote: Hi, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/gcc-46-support/ The patch adds support for building hotspot with gcc 4.6. gcc 4.6 changed how arguments are handled. It now treats -export-dynamic as

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-04-29 Thread Kelly O'Hair
The same hotspot sources and makefile deliver into our JDK6 releases, and formal builds of JDK6 are done on some very old Linux systems, RH2.1?, which I think is before 2000. -kto On Apr 29, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Omair Majid wrote: > On 04/29/2011 07:13 PM, David Katleman wrote: >> Hi Omair! >> >

Re: Request for review: 7036525 Disable alternative source mechanism for OPENJDK builds

2011-04-29 Thread David Holmes
Thanks John. Currently sitting here shaking my head is disbelief. I'll try this again. David John Coomes said the following on 04/30/11 03:47: David Holmes (david.hol...@oracle.com) wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/7036525/webrev/ Simple but crude. If OPENJDK is defined then the Ho

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-04-29 Thread David Holmes
Dave, David Katleman said the following on 04/30/11 09:13: Hi Omair! On 4/29/2011 3:59 PM, Omair Majid wrote: Hi, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/gcc-46-support/ The patch adds support for building hotspot with gcc 4.6. gcc 4.6 changed how arguments are handled. It now treats -ex

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-04-29 Thread Erik Trimble
On 4/29/2011 5:17 PM, David Holmes wrote: Dave, David Katleman said the following on 04/30/11 09:13: Hi Omair! On 4/29/2011 3:59 PM, Omair Majid wrote: Hi, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/gcc-46-support/ The patch adds support for building hotspot with gcc 4.6. gcc 4.6 changed h

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-04-29 Thread David Holmes
Erik Trimble said the following on 04/30/11 10:27: On 4/29/2011 5:17 PM, David Holmes wrote: David Katleman said the following on 04/30/11 09:13: On 4/29/2011 3:59 PM, Omair Majid wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/gcc-46-support/ The patch adds support for building hotspot wi

Re: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

2011-04-29 Thread Georges Saab
Hey Kelly, One thing that might be useful is to understand the kind of timeframe you are thinking about for this project? /GES On 29 apr 2011, at 16.05, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > > On Apr 29, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Steve Poole wrote: > >> On 26/04/11 15:54, Kelly O'Hair wrote: >>> >>> >>> On A