Fwd: Heads up, new jaxp source drop

2011-05-02 Thread Kelly O'Hair
FYI... -kto Begin forwarded message: From: Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com Date: May 1, 2011 10:38:36 AM PDT To: core-libs-dev core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Heads up, new jaxp source drop Heads up. The jdk7/tl forest has a new jaxp source drop dependency. 7040147: jaxp

Re: Fwd: Heads up, new jaxp source drop

2011-05-02 Thread Fredrik Öhrström
Thanks! But I am of the strong opinion that the jaxp and jaxws source code should be committed into the jaxp/jaxws repositories when drops are made. //Fredrik 2011-05-01 19:38, Kelly O'Hair skrev: FYI... -kto Begin forwarded message: *From: *Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com

Re: Heads up, new jaxp source drop

2011-05-02 Thread Kelly O'Hair
There has been a request for essentially that, more transparency on these sources. The downloads are also painful, I know. The issue with these sources is that they are effectively 'generated sources', transformed from master sources maintained elsewhere. Having them in the repository is too

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-05-02 Thread Omair Majid
On 04/30/2011 05:47 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: Omair, I'm second to David Holmes, -Xlinker forks fine since gcc 2.8.1 and I think we don't need any bracketing here. Personally I prefer -Xlinker over -Wl, because of better visibility. Ok, I have changed -Wl, to -Xlinker:

Re: Request for review: 7036525 Disable alternative source mechanism for OPENJDK builds

2011-05-02 Thread Keith McGuigan
On Apr 29, 2011, at 1:47 PM, John Coomes wrote: David Holmes (david.hol...@oracle.com) wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/7036525/webrev/ Simple but crude. If OPENJDK is defined then the Hotspot alternative source mechanism is effectively disabled by checking for a non- existent

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-05-02 Thread Omair Majid
On 05/02/2011 03:10 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: I'd filled 7041156 for you and I'll take care of the fix. Thanks. Much appreciated! Cheers, Omair

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

2011-05-02 Thread Dmitry Samersoff
Omair, I'd filled 7041156 for you and I'll take care of the fix. -Dmitry On 2011-05-02 19:47, Omair Majid wrote: On 04/30/2011 05:47 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: Omair, I'm second to David Holmes, -Xlinker forks fine since gcc 2.8.1 and I think we don't need any bracketing here. Personally

Re: Fwd: Heads up, new jaxp source drop

2011-05-02 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 09:23 Mon 02 May , Fredrik Öhrström wrote: Thanks! But I am of the strong opinion that the jaxp and jaxws source code should be committed into the jaxp/jaxws repositories when drops are made. //Fredrik +1 -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc.

Re: Heads up, new jaxp source drop

2011-05-02 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 08:40 Mon 02 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote: There has been a request for essentially that, more transparency on these sources. The downloads are also painful, I know. The issue with these sources is that they are effectively 'generated sources', transformed from master sources

Re: Request for review: 7036525 Disable alternative source mechanism for OPENJDK builds

2011-05-02 Thread David Holmes
Hi John, Fresh webrev at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/7036525/webrev.1/ Thanks, David David Holmes said the following on 04/30/11 10:09: Thanks John. Currently sitting here shaking my head is disbelief. I'll try this again. David John Coomes said the following on 04/30/11 03:47:

Re: Request for review: 7036525 Disable alternative source mechanism for OPENJDK builds

2011-05-02 Thread David Holmes
Fixed cc to hotspot-dev Original Message Subject: Re: Request for review: 7036525 Disable alternative source mechanism for OPENJDK builds Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 09:24:34 +1000 From: David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com Organization: Oracle Corporation To: Keith McGuigan