David Holmes wrote:
:
In contrast, there are basically two Java compilers in general use
(javac and ecj)
and one is part of OpenJDK. Yet, the Java code does not have -Werror
enabled by default and there
are a mass of warnings there as a result.
I don't understand the point you are making h
On 5/18/2011 12:23 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 07:25 Mon 16 May , Erik Trimble wrote:
On 5/16/2011 6:03 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/16/2011 12:08 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
The reason I'm asking is that I'm wondering if this is something we
should expect to crop up in different pa
On May 19, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> David Holmes wrote:
>> :
>>
>>> In contrast, there are basically two Java compilers in general use (javac
>>> and ecj)
>>> and one is part of OpenJDK. Yet, the Java code does not have -Werror
>>> enabled by default and there
>>> are a mass o
On 05/19/2011 08:00 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
On May 19, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
David Holmes wrote:
:
In contrast, there are basically two Java compilers in general use (javac and
ecj)
and one is part of OpenJDK. Yet, the Java code does not have -Werror enabled
by default an
On 09:47 Thu 19 May , David Holmes wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 05/19/11 05:29:
> > On 08:35 Mon 16 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> >> The -Werror option is a blessing and a curse. I find it highly commendable
> >> that teams (like
> >> hotspot) have taken a 'no war
On 10:32 Thu 19 May , Alan Bateman wrote:
> David Holmes wrote:
> > :
> >
> >> In contrast, there are basically two Java compilers in general use
> >> (javac and ecj)
> >> and one is part of OpenJDK. Yet, the Java code does not have -Werror
> >> enabled by default and there
> >> are a mass o
On 17:00 Thu 19 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
snip...
>
> But yes, a great project would be to see if we could get to 'javac -Xlint:all
> -Werror' someday.
> We really should... in fact it should be a requirement moving forward that
> all java code be warning free, and stay that way.
>
S
Jonathan Gibbons wrote
There's a useful interim milestone which is relatively trivial to
do. If javac -Xlint:all gives warnings, you can go javac
-Xlint:all,-xyz to disable the xyz category of warnings. The specific
value of xyz to use is given at the beginning of the warning message
in squa
Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 05/20/11 06:24:
On 09:47 Thu 19 May , David Holmes wrote:
Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 05/19/11 05:29:
On 08:35 Mon 16 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
The -Werror option is a blessing and a curse. I find it highly commendable that t
On 05/19/2011 02:20 PM, David Holmes wrote:
javac produces new warnings because new language features cause new
potential issues.
David,
FYI, javac has more warnings than you describe. For example,
-Xlint:fallthrough warns about falling from one case in a switch
statement into another. T
Jonathan Gibbons said the following on 05/20/11 09:39:
On 05/19/2011 02:20 PM, David Holmes wrote:
javac produces new warnings because new language features cause new
potential issues.
David,
FYI, javac has more warnings than you describe. For example,
-Xlint:fallthrough warns about fall
FYI...
-kto
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Kelly O'Hair"
> Date: May 19, 2011 17:53:36 PM GMT+02:00
> To: core-libs-dev
> Subject: Heads up, new jaxp source drop
>
> Heads up. The jdk7/tl forest has a new jaxp source drop dependency.
>
> 7044493: Incorrectly formated GPL headers in JDK7
12 matches
Mail list logo
