Sounds great.
1. Hopefully, builds triggerd from NetBeans would become easier especially on
Windows.
2. There are some make nodes e.g. nio charsets, which definitely don't have C code to compile, but
require Visual Studio to be installed on Windows. Hopefully this unnecessary dependency could
On 05/20/2011 06:57 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I did find it worrying that there was an active desire to use new
OpenJDK7 language features throughout the codebase (despite the
bootstrapping problems this can cause), yet these 1.5 issues remain.
Speaking just to the bootstrapping proble
On 16:12 Fri 20 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On May 20, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 13:11 Fri 20 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>
> >> We now have a Build Infrastructure project!
> >>
> >> Register for email at:
> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listi
On May 20, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
>> paralyze the javac compilations
>
> I really really really hope you don't mean that!For other readers, I
> think this should be "parallelize".
yeah yeah... make fun of the Irish guy. ;^)
-kto
>
> -- Jon
>
>
>
>
>
> On 05/2
On 05/20/2011 03:20 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
>> paralyze the javac compilations
>
> I really really really hope you don't mean that!For other readers, I
> think this should be "parallelize".
Let's stick with "paralyze". It's much funnier...
Is this another case of "Spillchuckers cons
paralyze the javac compilations
I really really really hope you don't mean that!For other readers, I
think this should be "parallelize".
-- Jon
On 05/20/2011 07:12 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
On May 20, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 13:11 Fri 20 May , Kelly O
On May 20, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 13:11 Fri 20 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>
>> We now have a Build Infrastructure project!
>>
>> Register for email at:
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/build-infra-dev
>>
>> The repos will be at:
>> http://hg.
On 05/20/2011 02:57 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> I did find it worrying that there was an active desire to use new
> OpenJDK7 language features throughout the codebase (despite the
> bootstrapping problems this can cause), yet these 1.5 issues remain.
I'd be a bit more worried for the hea
On 07:20 Fri 20 May , David Holmes wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 05/20/11 06:24:
> > On 09:47 Thu 19 May , David Holmes wrote:
> >> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 05/19/11 05:29:
> >>> On 08:35 Mon 16 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>
> The -Werror
On 13:11 Fri 20 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> We now have a Build Infrastructure project!
>
> Register for email at:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/build-infra-dev
>
> The repos will be at:
>http://hg.openjdk.java.net/build-infra/jdk7
>
> But I haven't been able to po
We now have a Build Infrastructure project!
Register for email at:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/build-infra-dev
The repos will be at:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/build-infra/jdk7
But I haven't been able to populate them just yet, having access issues.
Once the repos are pr
11 matches
Mail list logo