Re: Review request (XS): 7110396: Sound code fails to build on multiarch Linux systems

2011-11-10 Thread mark . reinhold
2011/11/10 17:45 -0800, david.hol...@oracle.com: > On 11/11/2011 1:47 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: >> 2011/11/10 4:49 -0800, robert.otten...@oracle.com: >>> The patch is correct, but in order to follow the convention in most other >>> makefiles, I advice to use OTHER_LDLIBS instead of EXTRA_

Re: Review request (XS): 7110396: Sound code fails to build on multiarch Linux systems

2011-11-10 Thread David Holmes
On 11/11/2011 1:47 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: 2011/11/10 4:49 -0800, robert.otten...@oracle.com: The patch is correct, but in order to follow the convention in most other makefiles, I advice to use OTHER_LDLIBS instead of EXTRA_LIBS. Ah, thanks. I missed that one when reading through

Re: Request to mailing list discuss rejected regarding "Re: Where have all the "fastdebug" builds gone?"

2011-11-10 Thread Ulf Zibis
Am 10.11.2011 15:04, schrieb Dalibor Topic: On 11/10/11 2:25 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote: Hi all, as disc...@openjdk.java.net was in the cc-list of those 3 posts, I just did "answer to all", as I thought my post would be interesting to all participants. While that is an understandable opinion on the

RE: Review request (XS): 7110396: Sound code fails to build on multiarch Linux systems

2011-11-10 Thread Robert Ottenhag
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Reinhold > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 4:47 PM > > 2011/11/10 5:16 -0800, robert.otten...@oracle.com: > > I am also not entirely convinced that the new multiarch > > support is the reason > > for these failures, although it may trigger it. > > Rig

Re: Review request (XS): 7110396: Sound code fails to build on multiarch Linux systems

2011-11-10 Thread mark . reinhold
2011/11/10 4:49 -0800, robert.otten...@oracle.com: > The patch is correct, but in order to follow the convention in most other > makefiles, I advice to use OTHER_LDLIBS instead of EXTRA_LIBS. Ah, thanks. I missed that one when reading through the common makefiles. 2011/11/10 5:16 -0800, robert.o

Re: Request to mailing list discuss rejected regarding "Re: Where have all the "fastdebug" builds gone?"

2011-11-10 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 11/10/11 2:25 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote: > Hi all, > > as disc...@openjdk.java.net was in the cc-list of those 3 posts, I just did > "answer to all", as I thought my post would be interesting to all > participants. While that is an understandable opinion on the side of any e-mail author, in pract

Re: Xm/Motif for OpenJDK build?

2011-11-10 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Strange, I would have assumed that the aptitude build-dep openjdk-6 would have gotten this. Maybe Dalibor might know more on this aptitude build-dep openjdk-6. -kto On Nov 9, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Srinivas Ramakrishna wrote: > Thanks Kelly. This doesn't seem to pull in the motif dependencies. I n

Re: Request to mailing list discuss rejected regarding "Re: Where have all the "fastdebug" builds gone?"

2011-11-10 Thread Ulf Zibis
Hi all, as disc...@openjdk.java.net was in the cc-list of those 3 posts, I just did "answer to all", as I thought my post would be interesting to all participants. I think, list moderators should accept such posts from un-subscribed senders, to avoid communication thread gaps. What is the r

Re: Review request (XS): 7110396: Sound code fails to build on multiarch Linux systems

2011-11-10 Thread Robert Ottenhag
On 11/10/2011 01:49 PM, Robert Ottenhag wrote: On 11/10/2011 06:24 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: Some Linux distros have started to adopt a "multiarch" filesystem layout for shared libraries in order to support the installation of packages for multiple hardware architectures on a single s

Re: Review request (XS): 7110396: Sound code fails to build on multiarch Linux systems

2011-11-10 Thread Robert Ottenhag
On 11/10/2011 06:24 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: Some Linux distros have started to adopt a "multiarch" filesystem layout for shared libraries in order to support the installation of packages for multiple hardware architectures on a single system. For more information see, e.g., http://wi