Hi Kamesh,
I cannot legally make the virtual machine open to all because of Windoze
licensing issues. I can make
it avaialble to you since I am not using it any longer. The rest of this
thread will be taken off group.
--Luss
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Kamesh Sampath
wrote:
> On 12/13
On 12/13/2011 01:00 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
Hi Kamesh,
OpenSCG presently builds the 32-bit OpenJDK6 Windows binaries and
installer and we use VS2003.
I haven't had time to get the 64-bit Windows build working,. But... I
have assembled a working
(and properly licensed) virtual machine that
openjdk6 would require source file changes and lots of makefile changes to
build with VS2010.
The transition of openjdk7 from VS2003 to VS2010 was a long and somewhat
painful trip.
Not that it isn't possible to do it for openjdk6, just no priority or need from
my point of view.
Of course, keep
Hi Kamesh,
OpenSCG presently builds the 32-bit OpenJDK6 Windows binaries and installer
and we use VS2003.
I haven't had time to get the 64-bit Windows build working,. But... I have
assembled a working
(and properly licensed) virtual machine that I am interested in sharing
with you.
It is Window
hi all
I tried to build a debug version of openjdk6. I follows these articles:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/simonis/archive/2008/01/hotspot_develop.html
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html
I've got the latest codes and an error occured:
2045 /usr/bin/gcc
Hi,
i am trying to build a openjdk-6 package on Windows 7 (64-bit) with Visual
Studio 2010. I am getting the COMPILER_PATH error though i have already run
`eval make/scripts/vsvars.sh`. I did read few posts that openjdk6 requires
VS2003 ..
Can any one let me know if its possible to build the s
Yes, I agree with Ben, it is just too short notice for us to do anything more
then promote it.
We will promote it anyway, no worries about it, but it would be nice to use
this opportunity to help people get involved.
We'll look forward for a next opportunity!
Thanks!
Bruno.
On 29/11/2011, at 0
Hi Nhan,
This is a bit long winded ... hopefully you'll find it useful though.
If you are wanting to only view HotSpot method names in the profile and
not also view HotSpot source code embedded in the profile and/or not
profile with hardware/CPU counters, then you do not need to build
anythi
Looks good
regards
Alex
On 10.11.2011 09:24, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Some Linux distros have started to adopt a "multiarch" filesystem layout for
shared libraries in order to support the installation of packages for multiple
hardware architectures on a single system. For more informati
