Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-03-23 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi Alan/Max, You're both right, I've actually been working from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk as opposed to http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl - thanks for catching that with the limited info I posted. Will start from scratch from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl and see where the yell

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

2012-03-23 Thread Seán Coffey
Martijn, I ran into same issue a few weeks back. If you're only interested in building the jdk repo, you can update your ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH variable to point to a recent 7u4 build. e.g export ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH=/export/home/jdk1.7.0_04 recent binaries at : http://jdk7.java.net/down

Re: Review Request: Build-infra M1

2012-03-23 Thread Fredrik Öhrström
2012-03-23 00:51, David Holmes skrev: > Not wanting to go too OT here but I see the build-deps server as > something to be used at most per machine rather than per developer. We > have build servers internally that can be used by dozens of developers > and we don't want multiple copies of toolsets

Re: Review Request: Build-infra M1

2012-03-23 Thread Kelly O'Hair
On Mar 22, 2012, at 4:51 PM, David Holmes wrote: > Not wanting to go too OT here but I see the build-deps server as something to > be used at most per machine rather than per developer. We have build servers > internally that can be used by dozens of developers and we don't want > multiple cop

Successful cross-compile from 32bit-linux to 64bit-linux

2012-03-23 Thread Fredrik Öhrström
With my latest small pushes to build-infra/jdk8-hotspot-jdk the build-infra forest can successfully cross compile from 32bit-linux to 64bit-linux and vice versa. Some of the final problems were to set HOSTCC,HOST_CC and NIO_CC to be the compiler that compiles code for the build platform. Strip aw

Re: Review Request: Build-infra M1

2012-03-23 Thread Michael McMahon
Is it possible to get a more verbose style of echoing the complete compile/build commands like the old build ? - Michael On 21/03/12 14:07, Erik Joelsson wrote: As outlined in [1], the build-infra project would like to push the current work into jdk8 in order to expose it to a wider audience.

Re: code review request for Full Debug Symbols Revamp (7102323, 7136506)

2012-03-23 Thread Andrew Hughes
- Original Message - > Greetings, > > I've backported the FDS changes to JDK7u6. Here's the webrevs: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7u6-root/ > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7u6-jdk/ > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/

Re: code review request for Full Debug Symbols Revamp (7102323, 7136506)

2012-03-23 Thread Andrew Hughes
- Original Message - > - Original Message - > > Greetings, > > > > I've backported the FDS changes to JDK7u6. Here's the webrevs: > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7u6-root/ > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7

Re: code review request for Full Debug Symbols Revamp (7102323, 7136506)

2012-03-23 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
On 3/23/12 12:08 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: - Original Message - - Original Message - Greetings, I've backported the FDS changes to JDK7u6. Here's the webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7u6-root/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp

Re: Review Request: Build-infra M1

2012-03-23 Thread Fredrik Öhrström
in increasing order of verbosity make VERBOSE= make VERBOSE=-d make VERBOSE="-d -p" Den fredagen den 23:e mars 2012 skrev Michael McMahon< michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com>: > Is it possible to get a more verbose style of echoing the complete compile/build commands > like the old build ? > > - Micha

Re: code review request for Full Debug Symbols Revamp (7102323, 7136506)

2012-03-23 Thread Andrew Hughes
- Original Message - > On 3/23/12 12:08 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > >> - Original Message - > >>> Greetings, > >>> > >>> I've backported the FDS changes to JDK7u6. Here's the webrevs: > >>> > >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/71365

Re: Review Request: Build-infra M1

2012-03-23 Thread Andrew Hughes
- Original Message - > - ahug...@redhat.com skrev: > > > What is this builddeps server? Is it something that's worth > > emulating > > elsewhere? > > A builddeps server is simply an ftp server with tar.gz or zip > archives. > The builddeps autoconf macros are inspired by the pkg-conf

Re: code review request for Full Debug Symbols Revamp (7102323, 7136506)

2012-03-23 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
On 3/23/12 1:50 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: - Original Message - On 3/23/12 12:08 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: - Original Message - - Original Message - Greetings, I've backported the FDS changes to JDK7u6. Here's the webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7

Re: Review Request: Build-infra M1

2012-03-23 Thread Fredrik Öhrström
- ahug...@redhat.com skrev: > I know that's the current status quo. It seemed to be being > suggested that the closed rules be removed from the public Makefiles and kept > separately. Maybe I misunderstood. Well, I guess I would like the closed rules be so simple that the default add/overrid

RFR 7156000: Change makefile to reflect refactored classes

2012-03-23 Thread Nils Loodin
Removed a folder in a jar-file and the classes into other folders, so some of the lines in Release.gmk became unnecessary. This should be cleaned up. Here's a very simple webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nloodin/7156000/webrev.00/ Regards Nils Loodin