Dan,
Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers.
The reason I say the diz-in-image story is unclear is because there are
no explicit rules that indicates that diz files should end up in a JDK
or JRE image. I can accept that everything should go in a full JDK
image. But a JRE is a JDK with a
Interesting point.
Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
2012/9/5 David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com:
Dan,
Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers.
The reason I say the diz-in-image story is unclear is because there are no
explicit rules that indicates that
On 09/05/2012 01:02 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Interesting point.
Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
I would have thought that depended on whether this is OpenJDK or proprietary
JDK. For OpenJDK, surely the debuginfo should be in all builds. We do
want people to be
On 9/5/12 4:46 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Dan,
Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers.
Not ruffled. Just very tired of FDS.
The reason I say the diz-in-image story is unclear is because there
are no explicit rules that indicates that diz files should end up in a
JDK or JRE image. I can
- Original Message -
Interesting point.
Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
Specifically talking about packaging, distro build systems already handle
stripping, etc. themselves so we've been setting STRIP_POLICY=no_strip.
However, this still creates the
Please review this small change to keep the script in sync with the
forest structure.
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcoomes/7196361-hs-make-closed/
inline diff:
diff -r d5e73011bde2 -r e177daf578bd make/scripts/hgforest.sh
--- a/make/scripts/hgforest.sh Thu Aug 30 10:26:55 2012 -0700
Looks fine to me.
-kto
On Sep 5, 2012, at 12:08 PM, John Coomes wrote:
Please review this small change to keep the script in sync with the
forest structure.
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcoomes/7196361-hs-make-closed/
inline diff:
diff -r d5e73011bde2 -r e177daf578bd
+1
-Chris.
On 05/09/2012 20:40, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Looks fine to me.
-kto
On Sep 5, 2012, at 12:08 PM, John Coomes wrote:
Please review this small change to keep the script in sync with the
forest structure.
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcoomes/7196361-hs-make-closed/
inline
Chris Hegarty (chris.hega...@oracle.com) wrote:
+1
Thanks Chris. Apologies for not including you in the cset comment; I
committed the cset and started the push before getting your message.
-John
On 05/09/2012 20:40, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Looks fine to me.
-kto
On Sep 5, 2012, at
Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote:
Looks fine to me.
Thanks Kelly.
-John
On Sep 5, 2012, at 12:08 PM, John Coomes wrote:
Please review this small change to keep the script in sync with the
forest structure.
webrev:
Hello,
Please help to review the new JDK8 file for the following CR:
7196354 check-in jdk.tbom file to openjdk repo
The webrev is located at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/7196354/webrev.00/
Build-dev:
The file will be pushed to the top level openjdk repository
Changeset: d5e73011bde2
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-08-30 10:26 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/d5e73011bde2
Added tag jdk8-b54 for changeset c1a277c6022a
! .hgtags
Changeset: b85b44cced24
Author:jcoomes
Date: 2012-09-05 12:42 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 0cb5f2471628
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-08-30 10:27 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/0cb5f2471628
Added tag jdk8-b54 for changeset 7dd81ccb7c11
! .hgtags
Changeset: 2946807a6d7f
Author:joehw
Date: 2012-08-17 09:49 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 6b2a363213f4
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-08-30 10:27 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/6b2a363213f4
Added tag jdk8-b54 for changeset 16c82fc74695
! .hgtags
Changeset: 18a02ad8dc73
Author:coffeys
Date: 2012-08-16 10:33 +0100
URL:
Changeset: 3b77f0c58018
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-08-30 10:27 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/3b77f0c58018
Added tag jdk8-b54 for changeset e8fb566b9466
! .hgtags
Changeset: 153776c4cb6f
Author:amurillo
Date: 2012-08-24 16:23 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 109c9e1f2d85
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-08-30 10:27 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/109c9e1f2d85
Added tag jdk8-b54 for changeset 91970935926a
! .hgtags
Changeset: c47742f53f99
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-08-30 10:27 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/c47742f53f99
Added tag jdk8-b54 for changeset 9cf72631baf5
! .hgtags
Changeset: 9d47f4850714
Author:jjh
Date: 2012-08-15 13:48 -0700
URL:
Andrew,
On 6/09/2012 1:00 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Interesting point.
Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
Specifically talking about packaging, distro build systems already handle
stripping, etc. themselves so we've been setting
On 6/09/2012 12:00 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 9/5/12 4:46 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Dan,
Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers.
Not ruffled. Just very tired of FDS.
Understood. Thanks for your patience and forbearance. :)
If the libraries are removed from the image, then that
On Sep 4, 2012, at 4:53 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
BTW, what's the reason to continue the new build infrastructure development
in a separate project (build-infra), not in the master workspace?
There are strict formal rules on the build forest, that every single commit
should have a
Need a reviewer for this change.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk8/jdk8-this-file/webrev/
It does change source, but it's effectively a build change.
The goal here is to try and create more predictable binary files and remove the
possibility that
a full source path (via __FILE__)
21 matches
Mail list logo
