On 9/18/2012 7:39 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
The following simple webrev will achieve what I think is needed:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/100062/webrev.01/
allowing OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited rather than limited
crypto policy in place.
I got a chance to talk to Valerie, and
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 10:39 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > This is an issue that has been with us for a while. See:
> >
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100062
> > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7188845
> >
> > for some backgro
On 9/25/2012 7:57 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Jim,
What is the reason of creating separate jdk.internal package tree - we
already have sun. and com.sun. treated as internal.
Mark R said to put it in jdk.internal.
- jjh
e.g. apache code is in com.sun.org.apache.*
-Dmitry
On 2012-09-24 23:4
Jim,
What is the reason of creating separate jdk.internal package tree - we
already have sun. and com.sun. treated as internal.
e.g. apache code is in com.sun.org.apache.*
-Dmitry
On 2012-09-24 23:43, Jim Holmlund wrote:
>
> Please review the fix for CR:
>
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/vi
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 10:39 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> This is an issue that has been with us for a while. See:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100062
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7188845
>
> for some background.
> [...]
> It's not clear to me why thi
