Looks ok to me.
---
I'm sure this stuff will come back to haunt you (us?) again and again. ;^)
-kto
On Dec 31, 2012, at 8:31 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> New webrev with support for overriding MILESTONE and JDK_BUILD_NUMBER on make
> command line. I'm not sure I like this feature, but it's bette
In the past, the "-encoding ascii" was important, all the reasons I can't
completely list right now. But it is important
that regardless of the locale, the bits created during the build should be the
same for everyone.
The definition of "same" might not be bit for bit, but by minimizing the
pot
New webrev with support for overriding MILESTONE and JDK_BUILD_NUMBER on
make command line. I'm not sure I like this feature, but it's better it
does what you would expect than just making things inconsistent.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8001895/webrev.root.02/
/Erik
On 2012-12-31 11:29
So many thanks for your help.
Indeed it solves the problem. And now I have my first build.
But it worth mentioning that in the first try it failed, and I have to use
--disable-ccache
My ccache is:
ccache version 3.1.8
Copyright (C) 2002-2007 Andrew Tridgell
Copyright (C) 2009-2011 Joel Rosda
On 2012-12-31 11:06, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2012-12-30 23:47, David Holmes wrote:
Erik,
On 30/12/2012 9:55 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I've added configure options for milestone and build number so that
they
can be customized.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8001895/webrev.root.01/
Can w
Hello,
What Patrick says is correct. This is a common issue and configure now
has a check that will fail and explain the problem. This probably hasn't
reached lambda yet.
Basically if you clone the source using mercurial that isn't cygwin
mercurial, into a directory that wasn't created by cy
On 2012-12-30 23:47, David Holmes wrote:
Erik,
On 30/12/2012 9:55 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I've added configure options for milestone and build number so that they
can be customized.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8001895/webrev.root.01/
Can we still override with make time variable setti
No, they are not. I hesitated as to if I should move it all to closed,
but opted not to at this point, to save time more than anything. Ok if I
open a bug on moving it to fix it later?
/Erik
On 2012-12-30 23:45, David Holmes wrote:
Erik,
On 30/12/2012 11:51 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Open par
Hi Boaz,
Have you created the "L2" directory within cygwin prior doing the check
out? When creating the Adopt OpenJDK Windows Build Wiki
(http://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/BuildWindows) this solved
the access problems.
Cheers Patrick
Am 30.12.12 21:53, schrieb Boaz Nahum:
Some mor
