Looks okay to me.
David
On 13/02/2013 12:32 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Good catch! There is no fundamental reason for switching to CFLAGS, and
since the other defines are added to CXXFLAGS so should this. Updated
webrev here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8007639/webrev.01/webrev
Good catch! There is no fundamental reason for switching to CFLAGS, and
since the other defines are added to CXXFLAGS so should this. Updated
webrev here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8007639/webrev.01/webrev/
Cheers,
Mikael
On 2013-02-12 18:02, David Holmes wrote:
Oops! Hit
Oops! Hit reply instead of reply-all. Adding back the lists.
On 12/02/2013 11:36 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Mikael,
So after our side-bar discussions on other ways to tackle this, the only
query I have now is why the original change adjusted CXXFLAGS and this
change adjusts CFLAGS instead?
Tha
Changeset: 6fde20398015
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-02-07 12:33 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/6fde20398015
Added tag jdk8-b76 for changeset e81839b32337
! .hgtags
Changeset: cbcd9b484759
Author:vromero
Date: 2013-01-27 19:38 +
URL:
2d-dev *and* sound-dev I should say ..
-phil.
On 2/12/2013 5:09 PM, Phil Race wrote:
I am not sure if you mean will it be "fixing" this.
The JDK 8 new build system should not be making any changes to the choice
of library or tools being used here or anywhere else without
discussion/consent.
Th
I am not sure if you mean will it be "fixing" this.
The JDK 8 new build system should not be making any changes to the choice
of library or tools being used here or anywhere else without
discussion/consent.
This is a product area specific change which will be handled on 2d-dev with
appropriate p
Changeset: 933742f4bb4c
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-02-07 12:33 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/933742f4bb4c
Added tag jdk8-b76 for changeset 3a2630528661
! .hgtags
Changeset: e63e7ee18412
Author:bae
Date: 2013-02-01 20:06 +0400
URL: http://h
I've filed a bug JDK-8008022 to upgrade to June 2010.
I'll add your suggestion about Oct 2004 as a workaround but if
Microsoft have a rolling removal policy that'll be gone soon too.
-phil.
On 2/12/2013 4:43 PM, Randy Nielsen wrote:
Building with DirectX 9 publicly available builds from 2006, t
MSDN usually keeps old products around a very long time (you can still get
Windows 3.1), but the obvious problem for the open source community is that it
is not publicly available.
Do you have a perspective on how stable-complete the JDK 8 build is or will be,
especially for Windows?
Randy
--
Changeset: 64dfba1bad16
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-02-07 12:33 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/64dfba1bad16
Added tag jdk8-b76 for changeset c4853f3f0e89
! .hgtags
Changeset: 02195d0e96b9
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-02-07 12:32 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/02195d0e96b9
Added tag jdk8-b76 for changeset 0c08593944d0
! .hgtags
Changeset: f0ad3747b40e
Author:emc
Date: 2013-02-05 14:56 +
URL: http://
Changeset: da53cb17186a
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-02-07 12:32 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/da53cb17186a
Added tag jdk8-b76 for changeset 20b605466ccb
! .hgtags
Changeset: 6fbe8a57549d
Author:amurillo
Date: 2013-01-25 03:03 -0800
URL:
Changeset: 35684a40c584
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-02-07 12:32 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/35684a40c584
Added tag jdk8-b76 for changeset 58be6ca3c060
! .hgtags
Building with DirectX 9 publicly available builds from 2006, the closest I can
find to 2004, fails. However with access to a DirectX 9 build only available
on MSDN with a login I found a DirectX version from October 2004:
dxsdk_oct2004.exe. When I installed this I was finally able to successfu
Changeset: 3933eebc659d
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-02-07 12:32 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/3933eebc659d
Added tag jdk8-b76 for changeset 278af9fc67e7
! .hgtags
I think Microsoft may have recently removed this.
Typing "summer 2004 direct x sdk" into google, the top hit is
a link to the download location but it is no longer is a valid link.
Obviously lots of people already have a copy but I'm not sure
if they can redistribute it to you.
We specified that
Actually I think this failure is because I accidentally installed two different
versions of the windows 7 sdk. I've rebuilt my system and am starting the
build again.
The OpenJDK README does require a specific version of DirectX 9 SDK - the
Summer 2004 version. The *problem* is that the Summer
It is my understanding that this is why we require the use of a specific
DirectX SDK.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html#dxsdk
-kto
On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Randy Nielsen wrote:
> "make jdk" fails building JavaX Sounds library in the include file objidl.h.
18 matches
Mail list logo
