Changeset: d5228e624826
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-23 18:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/d5228e624826
8012643: JDK8 b86 source with GPL header errors
Reviewed-by: dholmes, alanb
! test/java/lang/Runtime/exec/WinCommand.java
! test/java/lang/reflect/Me
Changeset: 72e03566f0a6
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-23 18:33 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/72e03566f0a6
8012643: JDK8 b86 source with GPL header errors
Reviewed-by: dholmes, alanb
! src/share/jaxws_classes/com/oracle/webservices/internal/api/EnvelopeS
Changeset: 899cbeee7253
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-18 10:30 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/nashorn/rev/899cbeee7253
Added tag jdk8-b86 for changeset 002ad9d6735f
! .hgtags
Changeset: 480b90430d29
Author:lana
Date: 2013-04-11 19:16 -0700
URL: htt
Changeset: 4f4509c2fe35
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-18 10:30 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/4f4509c2fe35
Added tag jdk8-b86 for changeset 6ab578e141df
! .hgtags
Changeset: eb134c8e931d
Author:bpatel
Date: 2013-04-09 14:18 -0700
URL:
On 2013-04-23 20:28, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 23, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Nils Eliasson wrote:
As long as we fix it first and remove gamma after - I would love to have some
redundant code removed. I would fix it myself, I just don't think I will have
the time before I go on parental le
On Apr 23, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Nils Eliasson wrote:
> As long as we fix it first and remove gamma after - I would love to have some
> redundant code removed. I would fix it myself, I just don't think I will have
> the time before I go on parental leave.
First, I'm not removing it tomorrow. I
Changeset: 8abe95530f58
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-18 10:30 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/8abe95530f58
Added tag jdk8-b86 for changeset a5e7c2f093c9
! .hgtags
Changeset: 28886cb008bb
Author:lana
Date: 2013-04-11 19:15 -0700
URL: http:
Changeset: 9550aab82b5d
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-18 10:30 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/9550aab82b5d
Added tag jdk8-b86 for changeset ca71ec37b2ef
! .hgtags
Changeset: 10db50a26b39
Author:joehw
Date: 2013-02-18 11:33 -0800
URL: http:
Changeset: 2e657354f6bc
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-18 10:30 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/2e657354f6bc
Added tag jdk8-b86 for changeset 86db4847f195
! .hgtags
Changeset: 3d641132f83b
Author:twisti
Date: 2013-02-26 16:16 -0800
URL: h
Changeset: 6981694f7674
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-18 10:30 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/6981694f7674
Added tag jdk8-b86 for changeset df9b5240f0a7
! .hgtags
Changeset: 7da551071fe8
Author:lana
Date: 2013-04-11 19:13 -0700
URL: http://hg.o
Changeset: f1709874d55a
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-04-18 10:30 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/f1709874d55a
Added tag jdk8-b86 for changeset 44a8ce4a759f
! .hgtags
As long as we fix it first and remove gamma after - I would love to have
some redundant code removed. I would fix it myself, I just don't think I
will have the time before I go on parental leave.
//Nils
On 2013-04-23 12:59, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
On 2013-04-23 11:09, Nils Eliasson wrote:
The
The gamma launcher is used to run and debug hotspot from Visual Studio.
So removing gamma effectively kills the working environment for a number
of people that use it daily. So I am strongly against removing it.
Most people working on Windows use Cygwin as the last resort since it
makes a lot
On 2013-04-23 11:09, Nils Eliasson wrote:
The gamma launcher is used to run and debug hotspot from Visual Studio.
So removing gamma effectively kills the working environment for a number
of people that use it daily. So I am strongly against removing it.
Maybe the visual studio project genera
14 matches
Mail list logo