Re: 8013415: Changes for JDK-8005523 requires updates to refs.allowed

2013-04-29 Thread Chris Hegarty
Thanks for the explanation, it makes reviewing much easier. I can see the additional types in the changeset for 8005523, so it looks good to me. If possible, it would be nice if that anyone touching source that effects jsse.jar could also check the profiles target. That said, I wasn't aware

Re: 8013415: Changes for JDK-8005523 requires updates to refs.allowed

2013-04-29 Thread Alan Bateman
On 29/04/2013 09:51, Chris Hegarty wrote: Thanks for the explanation, it makes reviewing much easier. I can see the additional types in the changeset for 8005523, so it looks good to me. If possible, it would be nice if that anyone touching source that effects jsse.jar could also check the p

Re: Fix zero build on arm

2013-04-29 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good! /Erik On 2013-04-22 19:58, Omair Majid wrote: Hi Erik, On 04/17/2013 03:31 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: On 2013-04-17 04:05, Omair Majid wrote: The following webrev makes zero build succesfully on arm: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/zero-on-arm/00/ The only problem I ran

Re: MacOS parfait problem (old build)

2013-04-29 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-04-25 16:48, David Chase wrote: Related bugs: 8008451, 8005879 This may generalize to new build as well, but I have not tested that. Apparently, when you pass " -mmacosx-version-min=..." to gcc on the Mac, it quietly generates a definition for MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED . Parfait (

Re: 8013415: Changes for JDK-8005523 requires updates to refs.allowed

2013-04-29 Thread Weijun Wang
Thanks for taking care of this. I thought this module/profile dependency thing was based on packages. -Max On 4/29/13 5:28 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 29/04/2013 09:51, Chris Hegarty wrote: Thanks for the explanation, it makes reviewing much easier. I can see the additional types in the chang

Re: MacOS parfait problem (old build)

2013-04-29 Thread David Chase
On 2013-04-29, at 5:49 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> >> So, do we call this a bug? >> And assuming we do, it needs fixing in hotspot, jdk, and root, right? >> > Yes, and possibly some closed repos too (deploy). A comment on why the > seemingly redundant macro is added would be good too. I take

Re: MacOS parfait problem (old build)

2013-04-29 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-04-29 14:00, David Chase wrote: On 2013-04-29, at 5:49 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: So, do we call this a bug? And assuming we do, it needs fixing in hotspot, jdk, and root, right? Yes, and possibly some closed repos too (deploy). A comment on why the seemingly redundant macro is added

Re: 8013415: Changes for JDK-8005523 requires updates to refs.allowed

2013-04-29 Thread David Holmes
On 29/04/2013 9:26 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: Thanks for taking care of this. I thought this module/profile dependency thing was based on packages. It mostly is. However we constrained ourselves to only modifying rt.jar. As Alan explained jsse.jar sources contain static refs to types not present

Re: RFR: Project files for Solaris Studio / NetBeans

2013-04-29 Thread Erik Joelsson
I think this looks good enough now. /Erik On 2013-04-25 15:52, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote: Hi, A new version of the project files are now available: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jwilhelm/7074926/webrev.4/ A new platform was added, we now support Mac, Linux and Solaris. The project was moved to

Re: Fix zero build on arm

2013-04-29 Thread Omair Majid
On 04/29/2013 05:35 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Looks good! Thanks for the review! Could I get a bug id so I can push this to jdk8/build? Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681

Re: Fix zero build on arm

2013-04-29 Thread Mike Duigou
Done. JDK-8013480 created and assigned to you. Mike On Apr 29 2013, at 08:56 , Omair Majid wrote: > On 04/29/2013 05:35 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> Looks good! > > Thanks for the review! Could I get a bug id so I can push this to > jdk8/build? > > Thanks, > Omair > > -- > PGP Key: 66484681 (

hg: jdk8/build: 8013480: fix zero build on arm

2013-04-29 Thread omajid
Changeset: 1dfcc874461e Author:omajid Date: 2013-04-29 12:34 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/1dfcc874461e 8013480: fix zero build on arm Reviewed-by: erikj ! common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh ! common/autoconf/platform.m4 ! common/autoconf/spec.gmk.in

hg: jdk8/build/jdk: 8013480: fix zero build on arm

2013-04-29 Thread omajid
Changeset: 12af7c32c648 Author:omajid Date: 2013-04-29 12:34 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/12af7c32c648 8013480: fix zero build on arm Reviewed-by: erikj ! makefiles/GensrcX11Wrappers.gmk

Re: Fix zero build on arm

2013-04-29 Thread Omair Majid
On 04/29/2013 12:09 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: > Done. JDK-8013480 created Thanks! I have pushed the changesets: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/1dfcc874461e http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/12af7c32c648 > and assigned to you. I cant access https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/

RFR: 8011814/8013271/8013272: Three improvements to J2SE Netbeans project

2013-04-29 Thread Mike Duigou
Hello All; This is a review for three changes to the J2SE Netbeans project. If necessary I can break this up into three separate patches but I would rather not if possible. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8011814/0/webrev/ 8011814: Add testng.jar to Netbeans projects test compile cla