Ron,
Thanks for the review!
Dan
On 8/6/13 6:19 PM, Ron Durbin wrote:
Your code looks good and it resolves the reported defect.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel D. Daugherty
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:36 PM
To: hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-...@openjdk.jav
Thanks for being another tester for these changes!
Just curious: which OS and VS version?
Dan
On 8/6/13 6:01 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Dan,
I have not reviewed the actual changes, but FWIW I have verified that
applying the patch does solve the linker error you mention. Thanks a
lot for f
Your code looks good and it resolves the reported defect.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel D. Daugherty
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:36 PM
> To: hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net;
> serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev
> Subject: code review (round 0) request for VS2
Dan,
I have not reviewed the actual changes, but FWIW I have verified that
applying the patch does solve the linker error you mention. Thanks a lot
for fixing!
Cheers,
Mikael
On 2013-08-02 15:36, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Greetings,
I have have a proposed fix for the following bug:
4. Using a debug jdk as your boot jdk
:)
Langtools taking 6 minutes is crazy long. Since there is no native code there,
#1 would be my first guess.
-kto
On Aug 5, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> From my experiences there are 3 reasons a compile could be slow:
>
> 1. Anti-Virus program
