hg: jdk8/build/jdk: 3 new changesets

2013-11-25 Thread bhavesh . x . patel
Changeset: 8bc258c021a3 Author:cl Date: 2013-11-21 09:23 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/8bc258c021a3 Added tag jdk8-b117 for changeset fc4ac66aa657 ! .hgtags Changeset: 66c98bd811f1 Author:rgallard Date: 2013-11-25 20:19 -0800 URL: http://h

javah not running

2013-11-25 Thread Pete Brunet
Is javah expected to run when the jdk tree for 8 is built? If I look in my make log file I only see javah executed 4 times, all 4 when hotspot is built. I assume the jdk code has plenty of jni and would expect to see plenty of use of javah when building the jdk portion, but I see nothing. I ask

Re: JI-9008287 - configure should provide better error reports about bootjvm binaries

2013-11-25 Thread David Holmes
Hi Dave, common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh stills contains an IBM copyright notice. Was it regenerated? Thanks, David On 26/11/2013 12:46 AM, Dave Pointon wrote: Hi David , On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:34 +, Dave Pointon wrote: Hi David , On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 01:45 +1000, David Holm

problem with filelist for multiple repo after 8026062

2013-11-25 Thread Weijun Wang
Hi Mike The webrev.ksh command after 8026062 still somehow supports the old "wx" file as an argument. But when the files come from different repos, it has a problem finding the correct description line. It looks like the $FIRST_CREV variable was determined at an early stage and it is used for

Re: JI-9008287 - configure should provide better error reports about bootjvm binaries

2013-11-25 Thread Dave Pointon
Hi David , On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:34 +, Dave Pointon wrote: > Hi David , > > On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 01:45 +1000, David Holmes wrote: > > > Please do. I moved the JI issue to JDK: > > > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028794 > > > > Not sure what your plans was for getting thi

Re: Improving the management and accessibility of the handling of JDK variants

2013-11-25 Thread Dave Pointon
Hi David , On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 12:07 +1000, David Holmes wrote: > Hi Dave, > > This all seems very complex and I'm unclear exactly what it would do or > why it would be needed (at this level of flexibility). Our own use of > the variant mechanism doesn't require this level of ability. Note y

RE: jdk8 extra c/cxx - flags settings

2013-11-25 Thread Baesken, Matthias
>We haven't had the need to customize the compiler or >link args for these yet, but I don't see why there shouldn't be a >variable from configure that that would enable customization. Hi Erik, aseparate configuration option sounds good . This is what I thought too >> , becaus

Re: jdk8 extra c/cxx - flags settings

2013-11-25 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-11-25 03:01, David Holmes wrote: Hi Matthias, On 22/11/2013 10:55 PM, Baesken, Matthias wrote: I had the need for setting additional C/C++ compilation flags in my OpenJDK8 build. It seems they are used for most jdk C/C++ compilation, but at least the generators from jdk/makefiles/

Re: Le roi est mort, vive le roi!

2013-11-25 Thread David Holmes
On 25/11/2013 5:02 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote: David Le 25/11/2013 02:55, David Holmes a écrit : On 25/11/2013 1:46 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote: Mike Le 19/11/2013 19:14, Mike Duigou a écrit : Early in jdk8 development it used the same build system as jdk7. A new build system was developed and event