Erik,
Thanks so much for handling much of the build work here. I was planning
on doing it, but you've got the background in the new build-infra so
this probably much easier for you. I've enjoyed learning new GnuMake
techniques.
I've reviewed this pretty well, but didn't hit the previous 2
Hi, Please review the following patch. The JNI header was not being
recreated for the Java Access Bridge when the signature changed.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8029045/
Thanks, Pete
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029292 logged to capture this
enhancement request.
regards,
Sean.
On 27/11/13 16:36, Joe Darcy wrote:
+1.0!
-Joe
On 11/26/2013 3:01 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
Yes please!
Mike
On Nov 26 2013, at 14:49 , mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Now that we've
On 11/27/2013 10:46 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
What security libs have j2 in their names?
libj2gss.so etc.
Any idea what the compatibility risk of removing the "2" would be?
This seems less prominent because it doesn't say "j2se", "j2re" or
"j2sdk" but I think it would be fine to rename thes
+1.0!
-Joe
On 11/26/2013 3:01 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
Yes please!
Mike
On Nov 26 2013, at 14:49 , mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Now that we've removed the old build system, can we please now
remove the last vestiges of Sun's pre-Java 5 naming scheme?
I refer in particular to these directo
2013/11/26 23:33 -0800, sean.mul...@oracle.com:
> On 11/27/2013 03:41 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> The security providers have vestiges of Sun in the provider names (SUN,
>> SunPKCS11, SunJSSE ..) but these are documented and I don't think can be
>> changed (although it not recommended to select serv
2013/11/26 8:29 -0800, david.hol...@oracle.com:
> On 27/11/2013 8:49 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> Now that we've removed the old build system, can we please now
>> remove the last vestiges of Sun's pre-Java 5 naming scheme?
>
> There are also a bunch of security libs with j2 in their nam
>
> What security libs have j2 in their names?
libj2gss.so etc.
--Max
On 11/27/2013 03:41 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 27/11/2013 00:29, David Holmes wrote:
On 27/11/2013 8:49 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Now that we've removed the old build system, can we please now
remove the last vestiges of Sun's pre-Java 5 naming scheme?
There are also a bunch of secu
On 27/11/2013 00:29, David Holmes wrote:
On 27/11/2013 8:49 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Now that we've removed the old build system, can we please now
remove the last vestiges of Sun's pre-Java 5 naming scheme?
There are also a bunch of security libs with j2 in their names -
should th
I wasn’t implying that it would go away, merely that it is a second class
citizen compared to the makefiles.
/Staffan
On 26 nov 2013, at 20:29, Erik Gahlin wrote:
> I know 5-10 Hotspot developers who uses Visual Studio (me included) so I hope
> it's not something that is going away.
>
> Erik
11 matches
Mail list logo
