Re: JDK-8025705

2014-04-29 Thread Salter, Thomas A
I have a different issue with closed and custom source that maybe can be addressed while you're looking at this area. As a licensee, I build with at least some of the closed source, but I also need to customize the build. Ideally, I'd like to be able to insert my custom make files and still

Re: Review request: 8040059 Change default policy for extensions to no permission

2014-04-29 Thread Alan Bateman
On 25/04/2014 00:07, Mandy Chung wrote: Thanks Sean. I have updated the webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8040059/webrev.01/ Erik - I'm including build-dev to review the build change for java.policy file. Just catching up on this thread. The update to ZipFileSystem and

Build OpenJDK 8 for armhf (Raspberry Pi)?

2014-04-29 Thread Jim Connors
Hello, Trying to build OpenJDK 8 for armhf, ultimately to be hosted on a Raspberry Pi. I'm cross compiling from a Ubuntu 12.04 x86 Virtualbox image and am using gcc-4.7-linaro-rpi-gnueabihf for a toolchain. Configuration invocation looks as follows: $ bash configure

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: Allow using a system-installed lcms2

2014-04-29 Thread Phil Race
I've run the patch through jprt and it builds fine (in default mode) on closed builds on all OS versions we build on .. so looks good. -phil. On 4/28/2014 8:27 AM, Omair Majid wrote: Hi Phil, * Phil Race philip.r...@oracle.com [2014-03-19 12:41]: On 3/17/2014 4:27 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: Allow using a system-installed lcms2

2014-04-29 Thread Omair Majid
* Phil Race philip.r...@oracle.com [2014-04-29 14:56]: I've run the patch through jprt and it builds fine (in default mode) on closed builds on all OS versions we build on .. so looks good. Thank you for testing this out, Phil. I take it I can go ahead and push this patch now? Thanks, Omair

Re: OS X configure ignores --with-tools-dir

2014-04-29 Thread Dan Smith
Thanks Henry, that will force it to choose my referenced compiler. Still not clear whether this is intended behavior or not: is the default toolchain-type (clang, apparently) supposed to trump an explicit tools-dir? I.e., is this a bug, or just surprising but intentional? —Dan On Apr 25,

Re: JDK-8025705

2014-04-29 Thread David Holmes
Hi Tom, On 30/04/2014 12:39 AM, Salter, Thomas A wrote: I have a different issue with closed and custom source that maybe can be addressed while you're looking at this area. As a licensee, I build with at least some of the closed source, but I also need to customize the build. Ideally, I'd

Attachment test - please ignore

2014-04-29 Thread David Holmes
diff -r ff056d90e349 make/jprt.properties --- a/make/jprt.properties +++ b/make/jprt.properties @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ # This tells jprt what default release we want to build -jprt.hotspot.default.release=jdk8 +jprt.hotspot.default.release=jdk9