Re: RFR: JDK-8056999 Make hotspot builds less verbose on default log level

2014-09-16 Thread David Holmes
Hi Magnus, This seems okay to me. Just for everyone else's benefit. We can pass LOG=info etc as a configure arg to set the default log level. But we can also pass LOG_LEVEL=XXX as a make arg to override that default. Thanks, David On 15/09/2014 9:16 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Here is

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello Naoto, From what I can see, this means that GensrcCLDR.gmk now only generates source for the jdk.localedata module. This means that Gensrc-java.base.gmk should no longer include GensrcCLDR.gmk and GensrcCLDR.gmk should be renamed to Gensrc-jdk.localedata.gmk. /Erik On 2014-09-16

Re: Review request JDK-8058367: Add verify-modules target to the default and images target

2014-09-16 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2014-09-15 19:24, Mandy Chung wrote: I am starting to not to count on most people building images and inclined to catch any new dependence earlier in the default build to avoid potential build breakage. The time for verify-modules is not small and there is potential performance improvement.

Re: RFR (XS): 8058317: Top-level Makefiles uses deprecated target jvmg in HotSpot Makefiles

2014-09-16 Thread Erik Helin
On 2014-09-15 18:43, Volker Simonis wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Erik Joelsson erik.joels...@oracle.com wrote: On 2014-09-15 10:26, Erik Helin wrote: On 2014-09-12 17:17, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello Erik, Looks good to me. Thanks! On 2014-09-12 17:17, Erik Joelsson wrote:

Re: RFR (XS): 8058317: Top-level Makefiles uses deprecated target jvmg in HotSpot Makefiles

2014-09-16 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2014-09-16 09:50, Erik Helin wrote: On 2014-09-15 18:43, Volker Simonis wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Erik Joelsson erik.joels...@oracle.com wrote: On 2014-09-15 10:26, Erik Helin wrote: On 2014-09-12 17:17, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello Erik, Looks good to me. Thanks! On

Re: RFR (XS): 8058317: Top-level Makefiles uses deprecated target jvmg in HotSpot Makefiles

2014-09-16 Thread Volker Simonis
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Erik Joelsson erik.joels...@oracle.com wrote: On 2014-09-16 09:50, Erik Helin wrote: On 2014-09-15 18:43, Volker Simonis wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Erik Joelsson erik.joels...@oracle.com wrote: On 2014-09-15 10:26, Erik Helin wrote: On

Re: RFR: JDK-8056999 Make hotspot builds less verbose on default log level

2014-09-16 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-09-16 08:44, David Holmes wrote: Hi Magnus, This seems okay to me. Thank you. Since this is a hotspot change, I assume I need a second reviewer, and that it should be pushed into hs-rt, right? Just for everyone else's benefit. We can pass LOG=info etc as a configure arg to set

Re: RFR: JDK-8056999 Make hotspot builds less verbose on default log level

2014-09-16 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good to me. /Erik On 2014-09-15 13:16, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Here is the full review of this fix. I have now applied the same pattern as I used on linux to aix, bsd and solaris as well. It turned out that windows was problematic. Due to the big difference between windows and the

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-09-16 09:41, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello Naoto, From what I can see, this means that GensrcCLDR.gmk now only generates source for the jdk.localedata module. This means that Gensrc-java.base.gmk should no longer include GensrcCLDR.gmk and GensrcCLDR.gmk should be renamed to

Re: RFR (XS): 8058317: Top-level Makefiles uses deprecated target jvmg in HotSpot Makefiles

2014-09-16 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-09-16 09:56, Erik Joelsson wrote: Actually, autogen.sh will fail unless you use exactly version 2.69. We started enforcing this a while back (a year maybe?) to avoid the large superficial diffs. Unfortunately, this is not entirely true. :( We have AC_PREREQ([2.69]) but this will only

Re: RFR: JDK-8056999 Make hotspot builds less verbose on default log level

2014-09-16 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-09-16 11:48, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good to me. Thank you Erik. /Magnus

Re: Review request JDK-8058367: Add verify-modules target to the default and images target

2014-09-16 Thread Alan Bateman
On 16/09/2014 03:04, David Holmes wrote: At what point, if any, is javac armed with the dependency information so that it can report any incorrect cross-module references (as we did for Compact Profiles) ? That is for further down the road once the module system goes in. -Alan.

Re: RFR: JDK-8056999 Make hotspot builds less verbose on default log level

2014-09-16 Thread David Holmes
On 16/09/2014 7:37 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-09-16 08:44, David Holmes wrote: Hi Magnus, This seems okay to me. Thank you. Since this is a hotspot change, I assume I need a second reviewer, and that it should be pushed into hs-rt, right? Right. Just for everyone else's

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Naoto Sato
CLDR's data is accessible only when cldrdata.jar is available, including their en resources. There is no need to put their en resources in java.base. Naoto On 9/15/14, 6:11 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: On 9/15/2014 4:30 PM, Naoto Sato wrote: Hello, Please review the fix for the following issue:

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Naoto Sato
Thanks, Erik and Magnus. Will take a look and revise the fix. Naoto On 9/16/14, 2:49 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-09-16 09:41, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello Naoto, From what I can see, this means that GensrcCLDR.gmk now only generates source for the jdk.localedata module. This means

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Mandy Chung
At one point you mention that CLDR will become the default in JDK 9. Would you need to move them back to java.base when it becomes the default? Mandy On 9/16/14 9:30 AM, Naoto Sato wrote: CLDR's data is accessible only when cldrdata.jar is available, including their en resources. There is

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Naoto Sato
Yes, the current plan is to make the CLDR's data the default one, only when it is available. Requiring it in the java.base would be problematic for smaller environments. This will be addressed in 8008577. Naoto On 9/16/14, 9:50 AM, Mandy Chung wrote: At one point you mention that CLDR will

Re: Build failures on OS X 10.9.3

2014-09-16 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-09-16 17:41, Ben Evans wrote: Hi, I suspect it'll be easier to just install gcc on your mac. The last time I checked openjdk 8 didn't compile correctly with clang, so you might also have to patch the source code as well as the autoconf scripts. So Apple are now shipping a compiler by

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Naoto Sato
I revised the fix based on suggestions from Erik/Magnus. I just ended up creating Gensrc-jdk.localedata.gmk, instead of renaming GensrcCLDR.gmk because GensrcLocaleData.gmk (formerly GensrcLocaleDataMetaInfo.gmk) is also needed to build jdk.localedata:

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Mandy Chung
On 9/16/14 9:57 AM, Naoto Sato wrote: Yes, the current plan is to make the CLDR's data the default one, only when it is available. Requiring it in the java.base would be problematic for smaller environments. This will be addressed in 8008577. Do you mean the EN cldr data is big? Mandy

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Naoto Sato
No. But I suppose smaller environments would just need JRE's locale data only. Including even some portion of CLDR locale data in java.base would make it not possible for them to jrecreate the image without CLDR. Naoto On 9/16/14, 2:09 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: On 9/16/14 9:57 AM, Naoto Sato

Re: [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

2014-09-16 Thread Mandy Chung
It's okay then and 8008577 will address this properly. This revised webrev looks okay to me. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8058509/webrev.1/ Mandy On 9/16/14 2:39 PM, Naoto Sato wrote: No. But I suppose smaller environments would just need JRE's locale data only. Including even some