Awesome, TFT Alex.
I'll use that as a starting point - I have, eventually, to roll this out
across the build environment here, so I need to understand it sufficiently
well to do that.
Thanx again ,
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly of beginning a work before we count
Hi Dave,
You'll need freetype libraries (both static and dynamic) for 8 on Windows.
You can use mine ones -
https://bitbucket.org/alexkasko/share/downloads/freetype_2.5.3_win_x86_64.zip
(and configure with --with-freetype=path/to/freetype_2.5.3_win_x86_64)
or build freetype in VS using soluti
Hiya Volker ,
I've realised (thanx entirely to you:-) that I omitted one of the most
salient facts - I was/am attempting to build 'vanilla' jdk8-b132, so your
very welcome offering bodes well for things for things to come ...
Rgds ,
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly
Hi Dave,
if you're building jdk9 you can now us the newly introduced
--with-freetype-src option which was introduced with
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057538. This will build the
required freetype library during the configure step. All you need is to
download and unzip the fretype sou
Hi Phil ,
Ah right, obviously I'm mistaking the configure step of 'checking for
X11/extensions/shape.h... no' as being the first step in its' quest for X.
Rgds ,
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly of beginning a work before we count the
cost and before we we judge r
It isn't searching for X11. It is searching for freetype which has no X
dependencies.
freetype is needed on all platforms.
-phil.
On 10/28/2014 12:25 PM, Dave Pointon wrote:
Hi again all ,
Pray tell, does anyone on here have any problem building on 64 bit Windoze
for a 64 bit Windoze target
Hi again all ,
Pray tell, does anyone on here have any problem building on 64 bit Windoze
for a 64 bit Windoze target ? I ask because as you may, or may not,
remember/know, I have the task of attempting to bring the IBM build system
into line with the current jdk8 autoconf based process and whils
Looks good.
-phil.
On 10/28/2014 12:18 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
could you please review the following tiny change which fixes the copy
step of the freetype libraries after 8058756:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8062312/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062312
Afte
Hi,
could you please review the following tiny change which fixes the copy
step of the freetype libraries after 8058756:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8062312/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062312
After the fix for "JDK-8058756: OpenJDK builds fail on Windows -
cannot c
OK, I've created "8062312: OpenJDK build fails when bundling freetype
libraries" (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062312).
Regards,
Volker
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-10-27 18:16, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>>
>> Did you mean
Why is sjavac ever looking at the classes in the bootclasspath of the
boot jdk in the compilation environment?
The boot JDK should only be used to *run* sjavac. Nothing more. The
compilation environment should only be "the new world".
-- Jon
On 10/28/2014 03:40 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hell
Hi Erik,
Looks good.
As the comment says source only wins over a newer classfile from
bootclasspath, usually rt.jar of the building jdk. A newer classfile in
the build destination that were compiled in a previous compile won't
trigger a recompile.
cheers
/Joel
On 2014-10-28, Erik Joelsson wrote
Hello,
Please review this small fix when using sjavac. When using a bootjdk
that was built at a later date than when the source tree was initially
cloned, there is a risk that sjavac will pick up classes from the boot
classpath (rt.jar of boot jdk) instead of the source files, concluding
that
Hello,
On 2014-10-27 18:16, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Erik,
Did you mean I should open a bug and propose a fix as suggested by you
or was that just intended as workaround for my local build problem?
(I've actually solved my local problem by replacing the sym-links by
hard-links which was easy i
14 matches
Mail list logo
