Okay, thanks.
Regards,
Manas
> On 12-Nov-2014, at 10:33 am, Wang Weijun wrote:
>
> No, I am able to build jdk9, but NOT jdk8. It seems the SDK (those .h files)
> no longer works with gcc in xcode4.
>
> --Max
>
>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 12:13, Manas Thakur wrote:
>>
>> Hi Wang
>>
>> You wer
No, I am able to build jdk9, but NOT jdk8. It seems the SDK (those .h files) no
longer works with gcc in xcode4.
--Max
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 12:13, Manas Thakur wrote:
>
> Hi Wang
>
> You were able to compile openjdk8 on Yosemite!! Can you please look into the
> error faced by me (first post
Hi Wang
You were able to compile openjdk8 on Yosemite!! Can you please look into the
error faced by me (first post in the thread; posted below as well) and figure
out the problem(s)?
Regards,
Manas
> Yes, I can compile the whole mess on Yosemite/Xcode 6.1. There was an issue
> with FreeType
Thanks for the review!
On 11/11/14 3:04 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Dan,
The fix looks good.
Thanks!
Nice cleanup from workarounds: Good Thing (TM)! :)
Yes, this has been in the queue for quite a while... :-)
Dan
Thanks,
Serguei
On 11/10/14 4:00 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty w
Dan,
The fix looks good.
Nice cleanup from workarounds: Good Thing (TM)! :)
Thanks,
Serguei
On 11/10/14 4:00 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Greetings,
I have a Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix ready for review.
Yes, it is a small fix, but it is in Makefiles so feel free to
run screaming f
Thanks for closing the loop on this!
Dan
On 11/11/14 9:21 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Dan,
Thank you for the explanation.
The fix looks good for me.
-Dmitry
On 2014-11-11 18:40, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Dmitry,
Thanks for the quick review!
Replies embedded below...
On 11/11/14 1:35
>> A longer answer is that we're currently working on getting jdk9 to compile
>> on Yosemite.
>
> Isn't it already compiling? I am on Yosemite and I can compile both openjdk
> and closedjdk successfully.
Yes, I can compile the whole mess on Yosemite/Xcode 6.1. There was an issue
with FreeType
Dan,
Thank you for the explanation.
The fix looks good for me.
-Dmitry
On 2014-11-11 18:40, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> Thanks for the quick review!
>
> Replies embedded below...
>
>
> On 11/11/14 1:35 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> 1. defs.make:
>>
>> It might be be
Dmitry,
Thanks for the quick review!
Replies embedded below...
On 11/11/14 1:35 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Dan,
1. defs.make:
It might be better to join obcopy version check and condition at ll.190
I looked at that... The seemingly natural place to put the version check
is actually in th
Dan,
1. defs.make:
It might be better to join obcopy version check and condition at ll.190
otherwise the user will have a wrong version warning and then misleading
message "no objcopy cmd found"
2. Did you consider moving objcopy detection to configure?
-Dmitry
On 2014-11-11 03:00, Daniel D
10 matches
Mail list logo
