Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8038189/webrev.jdk.v2/
Only changes are to profile-includes.txt.
Thanks,
David
On 2/12/2014 2:24 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Erik,
Many thanks for the makefile macro wizardry! I will incorporate, test
and return with an updated webreb.
David
Thanks David and Erik,
A bit more confused...I don't know what hotspot is.
I am aware of configure --with-build-number and --with-milestone and indeed use
themand that is why I get
bin/java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0-20141202"// note how this version is stamped
with a date
Amen to that Magnus - what possible motive can there be to fix invisible,
benign 'problems' ?
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly of beginning a work before we count the
cost and before we we judge rightly of our strength to go thro' with it -
Robinson Crusoe
On 3 Decem
Yep ,
I like that even more, Erik :-)
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly of beginning a work before we count the
cost and before we we judge rightly of our strength to go thro' with it -
Robinson Crusoe
On 3 December 2014 at 17:46, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Yes, it ca
Yes, it can be modified. My preferred variant for file existence
checking in make is "ifneq ($(wildcard /path/to/file), )". Also, in
Gensrc-jdk.jdi.gmk, I would probably like some other logical condition
to check on than sa-jdi.jar. We will address this at some point soon.
/Erik
On 2014-12-03
On Dec 3, 2014, at 3:09 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
> On 2014-12-02 22:59, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Build folk,
>>
>> The build has always generated warnings (sigh!) but right now, the warnings
>> look scarier than usual.
>>
>> In particular, when the build terminates, I get a couple of
On 12/03/2014 03:09 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2014-12-02 22:59, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Build folk,
The build has always generated warnings (sigh!) but right now, the
warnings look scarier than usual.
In particular, when the build terminates, I get a couple of
screenfuls of messages
On 03/12/2014 07:58, Staffan Larsen wrote:
These are warnings in the java.desktop module. I don’t know what the
appropriate email list is for java.desktop discussions, but perhaps bringing it
up there would be the right thing to do?
Most of the warnings that I see are in the AWT and 2D code an
Hmmm ,
Would it not be possible to modify Xerxes' suggested patch to do something
along the lines of ...
# sa-jdi.jar do not exist for Itanium and zero
ifeq ($(shell if test -a $(HOTSPOT_DIST)/lib/sa-jdi.jar; then echo N; fi),N)
SA_TARGETS += \
$(JDK_OUTPUTDIR)/modules/jdk.hotspot.agent/_th
Hello Xerxes,
Thanks for the suggestion. I have created
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066589 to track this issue.
Unfortunately we won't have time to fix it before pushing JEP 220 to
jdk9. I hope this won't inconvenience you too much.
Your suggested patch does correctly highlight
On 2014-12-02 22:59, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Build folk,
The build has always generated warnings (sigh!) but right now, the
warnings look scarier than usual.
In particular, when the build terminates, I get a couple of screenfuls
of messages like this:
/w/jjg/work/jfm2.0/dev.8059977.sjfm/jd
On 2014-12-02 23:45, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
wrote:
Staffan,
That seems to put it on the low end for reasonably being its own repo, if you
wanted that, at least, as indicated by the numbers.
Do we really want more repositories?
As long as the
The source/makefiles are not aware of the build number. It's assigned
from an external source at the time of building a promoted build. If you
want your version number to better match 8 GA, you will have to play
around with the configure arguments --with-build-number and possibly
--with-milesto
These are warnings in the java.desktop module. I don’t know what the
appropriate email list is for java.desktop discussions, but perhaps bringing it
up there would be the right thing to do?
/Staffan
> On 2 dec 2014, at 22:59, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
> Build folk,
>
> The build has always g
14 matches
Mail list logo
