On 02/10/2015 07:10 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
To clarify: The restriction in jtreg is that all tests are loaded in separate
class loaders (when running in samevm mode). A native library can only be
loaded in one class loader at a time. So if two tests tries to load the same
library we get err
Subject was wrong, this is a RFR on 8074048
On 2/27/2015 9:14 AM, Steven Loomis wrote:
Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074048
webrev: cr.openjdk.java.net has decided it doesn't like me, till it
is fixed trivial change is below
--- old/common/autoconf/build-pe
On 2/27/15 12:55 PM, Brent Christian wrote:
Hi,
Please review a small update to the module config files for a new
jdk.management.cmm module.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bchristi/8073596/webrev/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073596
The change looks fine.
Mandy
On 2015-02-27 21:55, Brent Christian wrote:
Hi,
Please review a small update to the module config files for a new
jdk.management.cmm module.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bchristi/8073596/webrev/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073596
I also found a needed hook missing f
Hi,
I am trying to build jdk9 client workspace
[http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client] on windows7 but encountered
problem while doing "configure". I have installed Visual C++ 2010
express. Does anyone knows what might be the problem?
$ bash ./configure --with-target-bits=32
Running custom
Hi,
Please review a small update to the module config files for a new
jdk.management.cmm module.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bchristi/8073596/webrev/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073596
I also found a needed hook missing from Gensrc-java.management.gmk
FWIW, Erik Jo
This is a few improvements of the compare.sh script, originally targeted
for JDK-8069064. It was forced to be left out at the last moment to
avoid costly merge conflicts. :-(
Since then JDK-8073965 has modified compare.sh in somewhat the same way,
but not as complete. Inspired by the changes i
- Original Message -
> On 27/02/2015 11:25 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >>
> >> On 26/02/2015 12:31 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> >>> On 26/02/2015 2:57 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>> These are the revised versions of the webrevs:
> >>>
> >>> http://c
Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074048
webrev: cr.openjdk.java.net has decided it doesn't like me, till it is
fixed trivial change is below
--- old/common/autoconf/build-performance.m42015-02-27
09:09:47.974447669 -0800
+++ new/common/autoconf/build-perfor
Sure.. I'll open a new one no problem.
-s
On 2/27/2015 1:17 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Right, didn't think of that case. The patch looks good but it needs a
new bug. We cannot submit more changes with the same bugid so
reopening doesn't work.
/Erik
On 2015-02-26 23:51, Steven Loomis wrote:
Late
On 27.2.2015 17:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-27 16:58, Jan Lahoda wrote:
On 27.2.2015 14:48, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 2015-02-27 09:31, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on JDK-8058150: "Compile for Specific Platform
Version". To support compilation for older ve
On 02/27/2015 08:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-27 16:58, Jan Lahoda wrote:
On 27.2.2015 14:48, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 2015-02-27 09:31, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on JDK-8058150: "Compile for Specific Platform
Version". To support compilation for olde
On 2015-02-27 16:58, Jan Lahoda wrote:
On 27.2.2015 14:48, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 2015-02-27 09:31, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on JDK-8058150: "Compile for Specific Platform
Version". To support compilation for older versions of the platform,
javac will need some de
On 27.2.2015 14:48, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 2015-02-27 09:31, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on JDK-8058150: "Compile for Specific Platform
Version". To support compilation for older versions of the platform,
javac will need some description of the APIs as they existed in
Hi Jan,
On 2015-02-27 09:31, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on JDK-8058150: "Compile for Specific Platform
Version". To support compilation for older versions of the platform,
javac will need some description of the APIs as they existed in the
target platforms.
For this, the curre
On 2015-02-26 16:05, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
The build compare script, which was developed for the build-infra
makefile rewrite project, has been unmaintained for a while. I would
like to bring it to a basic usable level with current JDK 9 (as I need
to use it quite a lot these days). Thi
Looks good!
/Erik
On 2015-02-27 11:41, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-27 10:57, Erik Joelsson wrote:
... and I added the missing targets test-*-jtreg-native to ALL_TARGETS.
It's not important, but I have tended to put the "ALL_TARGETS +=" at
the end of each marked off section so that
On 2015-02-27 10:57, Erik Joelsson wrote:
... and I added the missing targets test-*-jtreg-native to ALL_TARGETS.
It's not important, but I have tended to put the "ALL_TARGETS +=" at
the end of each marked off section so that it is easier to visually
verify that nothing is forgotten. You adde
On 2015-02-27 10:49, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-27 10:43, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-26 10:25, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Magnus,
Overall looks good. I would prefer if some of the longer lines in
Main.gmk were split as it's a file I often need to read. In
MakeBase, the d
On 2015-02-27 10:43, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-26 10:25, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Magnus,
Overall looks good. I would prefer if some of the longer lines in
Main.gmk were split as it's a file I often need to read. In MakeBase,
the definition of dups, I thought we (informally) agre
On 2015-02-26 10:25, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Magnus,
Overall looks good. I would prefer if some of the longer lines in
Main.gmk were split as it's a file I often need to read. In MakeBase,
the definition of dups, I thought we (informally) agreed to start such
macro definitions with a newli
Right, didn't think of that case. The patch looks good but it needs a
new bug. We cannot submit more changes with the same bugid so reopening
doesn't work.
/Erik
On 2015-02-26 23:51, Steven Loomis wrote:
Late to the party, sorry but the fix didn't work for me. Suggested
fix below - reopen th
Hi,
I have a question on JDK-8058150: "Compile for Specific Platform
Version". To support compilation for older versions of the platform,
javac will need some description of the APIs as they existed in the
target platforms.
For this, the current proposal is to use lib/ct.sym file (similar, b
23 matches
Mail list logo
