Hi,
I've uploaded another iteration, with these changes:
-the symbols file is now generated automatically (for the typical
OpenJDK case).
-fixed a minor issue in CreateSymbols that could cause putting class
description into wrong a file (the break - break OUTER; change).
-jdk.management module
Looks great. The only nitpick is that the comments in CreateSymbols
don't mention the fact that a side effect of the sym.txt generation is
the platform-description-file mentioned earlier in the same comments
(so one might wonder where does that come from).
Maurizio
On 27/05/15 10:37, Jan
Ah, yes, I did not realize that. Thanks, will fix.
Thanks,
Jan
On 27.5.2015 11:59, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
Looks great. The only nitpick is that the comments in CreateSymbols
don't mention the fact that a side effect of the sym.txt generation is
the platform-description-file mentioned
On 2015-05-26 12:24, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Any chance I could get a review on this?
Yeah, if you ask nicely, with sugar on top. ;-)
Fix looks good to me. Thanks for taking care of this.
/Magnus
/Erik
On 2015-05-20 16:09, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Thanks, changed to: Windows native binaries
I'm going to update OpenJRE to the version which contains Oracle April CPU
fixes.
According to the repo tags, I suppose, I should use jdk8u45-b14
I have 2 questions:
1. Is jdk8u45-b14 an official release branch for OpenJDK?
2. If it so - why wasn't 8u45 listed on OpenJDK 8 update releases page?
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Roger Riggs roger.ri...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
Sadly, but not entirely unexpectedly there is an anomaly in the include
files:
It seems that Windows does not define O_SYNC and O_DSYNC.
To make up for the absence
On 2015-05-21 07:33, Pete Brunet wrote:
Please review the following change for 8u:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8077296/webrev.00/
I only skimmed through the change. package-info.java should have @jdk.Exported.
Mandy
Background:
- As part of the open sourcing of the
Valerie,
Did you see my comment yesterday?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-May/012254.html
Since you have reverted the java.security to keep the classname, to avoid
causing merge conflict to jimage refresh, let’s remove the META-INF files in
the first push and the
Hi, build experts,
Can you please review the make file related change, i.e. the new file ||
*make/gensrc/Gensrc-java.naming.gmk*, in the following webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/7191662/webrev.01/
This is for merging the java.security.Provider file from various
providers and
