Thanks for the pointers Jon.
A not-quite-finished version of this work is up at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8075571.0/
The nashorn test makefile is copied from the jaxp one with s/jaxp/nashorn/g.
While I'm at it, I think it is worthwhile to add support nominal support
for tier 3 tes
On 3/06/2015 2:12 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
The repository version should be buildable on all platforms without any
source code modifications, shouldn't it?
The repository version should build with Studio12u3 on Solaris 10u6, or
Solaris 10u10. However if you want to build on Solaris 11.x then
Joe,
The magic you need to manipulate is lines 54-71 (approx) in test/Makefile.
# Default test target (core)
default: jdk_core langtools_jtreg jaxp_all
# All testing
all: jdk_all langtools_all jaxp_all
# Test targets
langtools_% :
@$(NO_STOPPING)$(call SUBDIR_TEST, $(LANGTOOLS_DIR),
JT_JA
PS It is a bit lame, but if new new definitions are put into the
jdk/test/TEST.groups file
diff -r df4d75f58f15 test/TEST.groups
--- a/test/TEST.groupsThu May 28 11:31:40 2015 -0700
+++ b/test/TEST.groupsTue Jun 02 13:21:06 2015 -0700
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
:jdk_other \
:jdk_svc
+j
Hello makefile gurus,
To provide the next level of support to the tiered testing policy [1],
I'd like to get some advice on how best to tackle
JDK-8075571: Support tier1 and tier2 make targets
From the bug, currently one can invoke test groups like so:
make test-only TEST=jdk_lang
T
Hello Eric,
Thanks for the change, this seems definitely better to me. I've folded
your change that into my patch. An updated version (just langtools this
time):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8072480/webrev.04/langtools/
Thanks!
Jan
On 2.6.2015 16:04, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Jan,
Hi Erik:
I still need an 8u reviewer, anyone?
Line 534 in jdk-options.m4 needs to line up with the following comment
lines. Otherwise, this looks good. No need to respin the webrev after
fixing the white space.
Tim
On 2015-05-27 16:05, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-05-26 12:24, E
The repository version should be buildable on all platforms without any
source code modifications, shouldn't it?
--Semyon
On 6/2/2015 6:47 PM, Phil Race wrote:
E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED is a favourite of SunStudio and
I recently fixed one such warning (in closed code so I can't point to
it here
E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED is a favourite of SunStudio and
I recently fixed one such warning (in closed code so I can't point to it
here)
but I did not see this one .. however I was using jprt and locally
Solaris 10 SPARC. So perhaps it is something to do with the headers ?
Ironically the warning
Hello Semyon,
Solaris Studio 12.3 is the correct version. However, internally we use
devkits with the compiler and system headers/libraries all packaged
together (details in separate mail). The devkits still use headers and
libraries from Solaris 10u10 for compatibility with that release. We
Hi,
I'm trying to build jdk9 under the current Solaris 11.2 version.
Which version of the Solaris Studio should be installed for that? The
readme-builds states:
...
At a minimum, the Studio 12 Update 1 Compilers (containing version 5.10
of the C and C++ compilers) is required, including specif
Thanks Magnus, but I still need an 8u reviewer, anyone?
/Erik
On 2015-05-27 16:05, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-05-26 12:24, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Any chance I could get a review on this?
Yeah, if you ask nicely, with sugar on top. ;-)
Fix looks good to me. Thanks for taking care of thi
Hello Jan,
Sorry to bother you with even more build changes, but with these file
moves, I realized that this new file, ct.sym, is really a part of the
jdk.compiler module and really not a special case at all. Because of
this, it should be generated as part of the jdk.compiler-gendata target.
On 6/2/2015 4:50 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 15:21, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Hate to disturb you again but I got yet another show stopper for my
Solaris build:
Generating solaris_amd64_docs/jvmti.html
Creating libverify.so from 2 file(s)
Creating libjava.so from 60 file
HI,
The compiler is doing more checking than others.
The other compilers don't seem to know that _exit() does not return.
The following patch may get past the issue. (I'm not sure if it will
with all compilers.)
Let me know if that works and we'll see about patching 9.
Roger
diff --git a/s
On 2015-06-02 15:21, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Hate to disturb you again but I got yet another show stopper for my
Solaris build:
Generating solaris_amd64_docs/jvmti.html
Creating libverify.so from 2 file(s)
Creating libjava.so from 60 file(s)
Creating libfdlibm.a from 62 file(s)
Creating
On 2015-06-02 13:50, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
On 02/06/2015 12:45, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
These should be removed instead.
Okay but I don't think it reasonable to expect Bertrand to make such
changes. In
Hello,
Hate to disturb you again but I got yet another show stopper for my
Solaris build:
Generating solaris_amd64_docs/jvmti.html
Creating libverify.so from 2 file(s)
Creating libjava.so from 60 file(s)
Creating libfdlibm.a from 62 file(s)
Creating libzip.so from 21 file(s)
Creating libjli.so
On 2/06/2015 10:36 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 13:29, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:45 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
These should be removed instead.
Okay but I don't think it reasona
On 2015-06-02 13:29, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:45 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
These should be removed instead.
Okay but I don't think it reasonable to expect Bertrand to make such
changes. In th
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-06-02 12:45, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
These should be removed instead.
Okay but I don't think it reasonable to expect Bertrand to make such
changes. In the interest of mo
On 02/06/2015 12:45, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
These should be removed instead.
Okay but I don't think it reasonable to expect Bertrand to make such
changes. In the interest of moving forward can we use his
On 2015-06-02 12:33, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:22, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:12 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 1:06 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, M
On 2/06/2015 8:45 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
These should be removed instead.
Okay but I don't think it reasonable to expect Bertrand to make such
changes. In the interest of moving forward can we use hi
On 2015-06-02 12:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
These should be removed instead.
Okay but I don't think it reasonable to expect Bertrand to make such
changes. In the interest of moving forward can we use his current
patch and file a follow up bug to get
On 6/2/2015 1:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:22, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:12 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 1:06 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:
On 02/06/2015 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:22 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:57, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 6:58 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 19:23, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warni
On 2015-06-02 12:27, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:22 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:57, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 6:58 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 19:23, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warni
On 2/06/2015 8:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 12:22, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:12 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 1:06 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:
On 2015-06-02 12:22, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 8:12 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 1:06 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM,
That helped. Thank you!
--Semyon
On 6/2/2015 1:18 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Or no, I wrote too fast. The assembler 'as' is part of Solaris and not
Solaris Studio. You need to install the correct package to get it in
/usr/bin/as.
/Erik
On 2015-06-02 12:17, Erik Joelsson wrote:
When I build on
On 2/06/2015 8:22 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:57, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 6:58 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 19:23, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warnings-as-errors (this is not a full cleanup)
On 2015-06-02 12:06, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could yo
On 2015-06-02 11:57, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 6:58 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 19:23, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warnings-as-errors (this is not a full cleanup):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bdelsart/8081616/w
On 2/06/2015 8:12 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 1:06 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 2
Or no, I wrote too fast. The assembler 'as' is part of Solaris and not
Solaris Studio. You need to install the correct package to get it in
/usr/bin/as.
/Erik
On 2015-06-02 12:17, Erik Joelsson wrote:
When I build on Solaris, configure finds 'as' in the Solaris Studio
bin dir.
/Erik
On 201
When I build on Solaris, configure finds 'as' in the Solaris Studio bin dir.
/Erik
On 2015-06-02 12:12, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 1:06 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Sem
On 2/06/2015 5:54 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 9:27 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 4:20 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
On 6/2/2015 1:06 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could yo
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 1
On 2/06/2015 7:57 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 6:58 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 19:23, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warnings-as-errors (this is not a full cleanup):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bdelsart/808161
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-05-29 11:15, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
A request have been made to be able to set specific LDFLAGS for
individual tests/libraries in SetupTestFilesCompilation, similar to
the CFLAGS_filename construct in SetupNativeCompilation,
e.g.
LDFLAGS_libFooBar := -lfoofl
On 2/06/2015 6:58 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 19:23, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warnings-as-errors (this is not a full cleanup):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bdelsart/8081616/webrev.00/webrev/
Without the fix, -Werror
On 2/06/2015 6:40 PM, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Thanks David,
Answers inlined.
On 02/06/2015 01:34, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Bertrand,
On 2/06/2015 3:23 AM, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warnings-as-errors (this is not a full cleanup):
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No s
On 2015-06-01 19:23, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warnings-as-errors (this is not a full cleanup):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bdelsart/8081616/webrev.00/webrev/
Without the fix, -Werror is used to compiled native JDK libraries even
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Er
Thanks David,
Answers inlined.
On 02/06/2015 01:34, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Bertrand,
On 2/06/2015 3:23 AM, Bertrand Delsart wrote:
Hi all,
A small open webrev to fix some issues around
--disable-warnings-as-errors (this is not a full cleanup):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bdelsart/8081616/we
On 6/2/2015 9:27 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 4:20 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such fi
49 matches
Mail list logo
