+1 from me. Does the Verona JEP say anything about this? I certainly do
not expect the specification version number of differ from the major
release number.
David
On 26/07/2016 10:26 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
This looks right but I'm curious why it was initially implemented to use
VERSION_NUMBE
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> This looks right
Thanks!
> but I'm curious why it was initially implemented to use VERSION_NUMBER.
Probably because until now VERSION_NUMBER == VERSION_MAJOR == 9?
>
> -Alan
>
>
>
> On 26/07/2016 13:20, Volker Simonis wrote:
>
>> Forwardin
This looks right but I'm curious why it was initially implemented to use
VERSION_NUMBER.
-Alan
On 26/07/2016 13:20, Volker Simonis wrote:
Forwarding to build-dev in the hope to get a review there :)
More details can be found in the bug description.
Thank you and best regards,
Volker
-
Forwarding to build-dev in the hope to get a review there :)
More details can be found in the bug description.
Thank you and best regards,
Volker
-- Forwarded message --
From: Volker Simonis
Date: Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:47 PM
Subject: RFR(XXS): 8149519: Investigate implementation
