Re: [10] RFR(S) 8186462: [Graal] build Graal regardless AOT build

2017-08-29 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
On 8/29/17 12:30 AM, Lennart Börjeson wrote: Could we, please, get this on OSX/MacOS, too? Unfortunately we can not do that. We have very tight schedule for next release and we are doing only linux-x64 testing now due to most resources are used for JDK 9 final testing. Regards, Vladimir (

Re: [10] RFR(S) 8186462: [Graal] build Graal regardless AOT build

2017-08-29 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
Thank you, Erik Vladimir On 8/29/17 12:14 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good to me. /Erik On 2017-08-28 22:18, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8186462/webrev/ https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186462 We are planning to have Graal as experimental JIT compiler

Re: RFR: JDK-8185928: Generate OpenJDK builds for Mac platform JDK 9.0.3 and beyond in Mach 5

2017-08-29 Thread Tim Bell
Erik: On 08/29/17 03:44, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2017-08-29 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote: This change adds configuration necessary for our internal distributed build system to store builds of OpenJDK on Macosx. This is intended for JDK 10. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-81859

Re: [10] RFR(S) 8186462: [Graal] build Graal regardless AOT build

2017-08-29 Thread Andrew Haley
On 28/08/17 21:18, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: > We are planning to have Graal as experimental JIT compiler on linux-x64 > in next release. For that we should enable its build independent from > AOT build. Excellent. We'll want to pull the AArch64 parts of Graal next time there is an import. -- An

Re: CompileJavaModule.gmk overrides values from a custom extension gmk

2017-08-29 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello Jason, Your suggestion makes sense. The only reason these variables have := today is that we (at Oracle) haven't had a need for appending to those particular variables (yet). /Erik On 2017-08-29 11:31, Jason Yong wrote: Hello, I've had an issue where I've had a custom extension to

Re: RFR: JDK-8185928: Generate OpenJDK builds for Mac platform JDK 9.0.3 and beyond in Mach 5

2017-08-29 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2017-08-29 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote: This change adds configuration necessary for our internal distributed build system to store builds of OpenJDK on Macosx. This is intended for JDK 10. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185928 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/81859

CompileJavaModule.gmk overrides values from a custom extension gmk

2017-08-29 Thread Jason Yong
Hello, I've had an issue where I've had a custom extension to CompileJavaModules.gmk with the variable java.base_COPY set to files that I wanted to be copied across but its value was overwritten by CompileJavaModules.gmk. I would like to propose changes that would allow a custom extensions to

RFR: JDK-8185928: Generate OpenJDK builds for Mac platform JDK 9.0.3 and beyond in Mach 5

2017-08-29 Thread Erik Joelsson
This change adds configuration necessary for our internal distributed build system to store builds of OpenJDK on Macosx. This is intended for JDK 10. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185928 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8185928/webrev.01/ /Erik

Re: [10] RFR(S) 8186462: [Graal] build Graal regardless AOT build

2017-08-29 Thread Lennart Börjeson
Could we, please, get this on OSX/MacOS, too? (For now, I enabling it in my own builds, but it would be nice to have it in the release builds.) Best regards, /Lennart > 28 aug. 2017 kl. 22:18 skrev Vladimir Kozlov : > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8186462/webrev/ > https://bugs.openjdk.ja

Re: [10] RFR(S) 8186462: [Graal] build Graal regardless AOT build

2017-08-29 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good to me. /Erik On 2017-08-28 22:18, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8186462/webrev/ https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186462 We are planning to have Graal as experimental JIT compiler on linux-x64 in next release. For that we should enable its build i