Hi Jorn,
As you probably have understood by now, porting OpenJDK to msys2 is not
just a simple quick fix. If all you want is to build OpenJDK on your
Windows computer, you are probably better off by trying to fix your
Cygwin installation. From your description, it sounds like you'll need
to r
On 2018-06-11 22:42, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Based on the discussion here, I have reverted back to something more
similar to webrev.02, but with a few changes. Mainly fixing a bug that
caused JVM_FEATURES_hardened to not actually be the same as for server
(if you have custom additions
On 2018-06-12 08:06, David Holmes wrote:
On 11/06/2018 4:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-06-10 15:35, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:38 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
With some simple changes, our devkit scripts can be made to
generate devkits for cross-compiling on linux-x64 to
On 11/06/2018 4:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-06-10 15:35, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:38 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
With some simple changes, our devkit scripts can be made to generate
devkits for cross-compiling on linux-x64 to linux-arm (32-bit). Also
add a jib profile
Hi Vladimir,
The fix looks good to me.
— Igor
> On Jun 11, 2018, at 6:15 PM, Vladimir Kozlov
> wrote:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8204113/webrev.01/
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204113
>
> AOT tests need a local linker to generate AOT libraries. They load devkits
> f
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8204113/webrev.01/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204113
AOT tests need a local linker to generate AOT libraries. They load
devkits from our infrastructure when there is no local linker on testing
machine. The names of devkits are hardcoded in AotCompi
Looks good to me.
/Jesper
> On 11 Jun 2018, at 22:42, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Based on the discussion here, I have reverted back to something more similar
> to webrev.02, but with a few changes. Mainly fixing a bug that caused
> JVM_FEATURES_hardened to not actually be the same as
Hello,
I have tried the MSYS2_ARG_CONV_EXCL environment variable, thanks for
the suggestion. It's supposed to be a semi-colon separated list of
argument prefixes (they have some examples like
`/switch;/sdcard;--root=`), so I tried setting it to `/out:`, `-Fe`
(from the .m4 file) and `/out`, a
Hello,
Based on the discussion here, I have reverted back to something more
similar to webrev.02, but with a few changes. Mainly fixing a bug that
caused JVM_FEATURES_hardened to not actually be the same as for server
(if you have custom additions in configure). I also added a check so
that c
Hello,
On 2018-06-11 13:00, jbvernee wrote:
Hello Erik,
Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately it didn't help. TBH, I've
been banging my head against trying to build the JDK on my machine on
and off for a few months. So at this point I really appreciate any
help that gets me even an inc
Hello Erik,
Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately it didn't help. TBH, I've
been banging my head against trying to build the JDK on my machine on
and off for a few months. So at this point I really appreciate any help
that gets me even an inch further, thanks.
After your suggestion, I
On 2018-06-11 11:09, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-06-11 17:42, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Looks ok. Perhaps this warrants a comment somewhere about the failure
logs only working in parallel targets?
Do you mean a comment in the code, or in the build documentation?
I'm thinking in th
On 2018-06-11 17:42, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Looks ok. Perhaps this warrants a comment somewhere about the failure
logs only working in parallel targets?
Do you mean a comment in the code, or in the build documentation?
/Magnus
/Erik
On 2018-06-11 01:50, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Hello Jorn,
I don't have access to an msys2 environment to try this myself and as we
don't regularly build there, it's unfortunately not expected to work.
Msys has a habit of trying to outsmart the user when treating paths, by
automatically converting path formats from unix style to windows st
Hello,
I've been trying to build the JDK using an msys2 toolchain, which seems
to be possible according to this thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2017-October/019862.html
(although I'm not trying to use gcc, I'm using VS 15). I know it's
advised to use cygwin, but I can
Hi Erik, Thomas,
thanks for the quick review!
Regards,
Volker
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> This looks good and I can confirm fixes our AIX build,
>
> Thanks for fixing!
>
>
> ..Thomas
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Volker Simonis
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> can I pl
This looks good and I can confirm fixes our AIX build,
Thanks for fixing!
..Thomas
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Volker Simonis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can I please have a review for the following trivial build change
> which fixes a build problem on AIX when building libjli_static:
>
> http://cr
Looks ok.
/Erik
On 2018-06-11 07:48, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
can I please have a review for the following trivial build change
which fixes a build problem on AIX when building libjli_static:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8204684/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-
Looks good. Sneaky problem!
/Erik
On 2018-06-11 06:29, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Parsing for LOG=report=none is broken when combined with other
keywords, e.g. "LOG=info,report=none".
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204682
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8204682-L
I agree, will change.
/Erik
On 2018-06-11 01:55, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-06-09 02:05, Erik Joelsson wrote:
The compressed archive bundles we create are all tar.gz format. On
Windows that's not a very common format, requiring third party
applications to handle, while the zip format
Hello,
Looks ok. Perhaps this warrants a comment somewhere about the failure
logs only working in parallel targets?
/Erik
On 2018-06-11 01:50, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When running a compound make line such as "make reconfigure clean
jdk-image test-image", make will first single out the "s
Hi,
can I please have a review for the following trivial build change
which fixes a build problem on AIX when building libjli_static:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8204684/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204684
The reason is that change 8204572 forgot to add LIBJLI_
Parsing for LOG=report=none is broken when combined with other keywords,
e.g. "LOG=info,report=none".
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204682
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8204682-LOG-report-parsing-broken/webrev.01
/Magnus
On 2018-06-09 02:05, Erik Joelsson wrote:
The compressed archive bundles we create are all tar.gz format. On
Windows that's not a very common format, requiring third party
applications to handle, while the zip format can be natively
extracted. This patch changes the bundle format for the JDK on
When running a compound make line such as "make reconfigure clean
jdk-image test-image", make will first single out the "sequential"
targets reconfigure and clean, and execute them single-threaded, in
sequence, and then it will build the remaining targets in parallel.
However, the macro Prepare
Sorry this is making my head spin.
Doh! jvm-features only apply to the JVM.
So I retract my last email - sorry.
And with that I'm going to just bow out. You and Erik can figure it out.
Thanks,
David
On 11/06/2018 6:19 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-06-11 09:38, David Holmes wrote:
H
On 2018-06-11 09:38, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 11/06/2018 5:10 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-06-08 23:50, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2018-06-07 17:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:11 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I just don't think the extra work is warranted or should be
pri
Hi Magnus,
On 11/06/2018 5:10 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-06-08 23:50, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2018-06-07 17:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:11 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I just don't think the extra work is warranted or should be
prioritized at this point. I also cannot think
On 2018-06-10 15:28, David Holmes wrote:
On 9/06/2018 7:50 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2018-06-07 17:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:11 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I just don't think the extra work is warranted or should be
prioritized at this point. I also cannot think of a combination
On 2018-06-08 23:50, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2018-06-07 17:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:11 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I just don't think the extra work is warranted or should be
prioritized at this point. I also cannot think of a combination of
options required for what you are suggest
30 matches
Mail list logo
