Re: Building Portola JDK11 for AMR64 arch

2018-10-26 Thread Mikael Vidstedt
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 3:47 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > > On 10/26/2018 10:36 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 10/26/2018 09:00 AM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote: >>> ./configure --openjdk-target=aarch64-oe-linux >>> --with-boot-jdk=/work/jdk11/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk >>> --with-d

Re: RFR: JDK-8213005: Missing symbols in hs_err files on Windows after JDK-8212028

2018-10-26 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2018-10-26 03:29, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: I see that you've already pushed this fix. It looks good to me, I was just wondering about this: $(info _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=$(_NT_SYMBOL_PATH)) This was not added by your fix, but should we print this always? Looks like it should be guarded that the

Re: Building Portola JDK11 for AMR64 arch

2018-10-26 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On 10/26/2018 10:36 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/26/2018 09:00 AM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote: >> ./configure --openjdk-target=aarch64-oe-linux >> --with-boot-jdk=/work/jdk11/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk >> --with-devkit=/tools/aarch64-toolchain/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2 >> 018.05-x86_64_a

Re: RFR: JDK-8213005: Missing symbols in hs_err files on Windows after JDK-8212028

2018-10-26 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
I see that you've already pushed this fix. It looks good to me, I was just wondering about this: $(info _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=$(_NT_SYMBOL_PATH)) This was not added by your fix, but should we print this always? Looks like it should be guarded that the log level is info or below. /Magnus On 2018-1

Re: Building Portola JDK11 for AMR64 arch

2018-10-26 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/26/2018 09:00 AM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote: > ./configure --openjdk-target=aarch64-oe-linux > --with-boot-jdk=/work/jdk11/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk > --with-devkit=/tools/aarch64-toolchain/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2 > 018.05-x86_64_aarch64-linux-gnu --disable-warnings-as-errors > --

Re: Building Portola JDK11 for AMR64 arch

2018-10-26 Thread Mikael Vidstedt
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 1:00 AM, Mikael Vidstedt > wrote: > > > > It looks like the compiler doesn’t recognize the aarch64 instruction set, so > configure probably picked up the wrong compiler. You’d have to double check > what configure says it’s going to use. > > However, even if you add

Re: Building Portola JDK11 for AMR64 arch

2018-10-26 Thread Mikael Vidstedt
It looks like the compiler doesn’t recognize the aarch64 instruction set, so configure probably picked up the wrong compiler. You’d have to double check what configure says it’s going to use. However, even if you address that it’s unlikely to work. As you probably know Alpine uses the musl C