To my surprise I checked the default meaning of ASFLAGS in make and found
'ASFLAGS'
Extra flags to give to the assembler (when explicitly invoked on a
'.s' or '.S' file).
$ make -p |& grep -B1 AS.*FLAG
# default
LINK.S = $(CC) $(ASFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(TARGET_MACH)
--
# defa
Hi Severin,
I have a solution for Solaris.
In your webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8210761/jdk8/02/webrev/,
make/solaris/makefiles/jsig.make, Line 52:JSIG_OPT_FLAGS = $(OPT_CFLAGS)
Should be: JSIG_OPT_FLAGS = -xO4 -g
OPT_CFLAGS are the opt flags for the C++ compil
Hi Martin,
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 10:42 -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> (not really a review ...)
>
> I'm confused because the assembler is invoked when compiling any sort of
> source file - C, C++, or .s/.S.
> Wouldn't we want assembler flags passed uniformly, no matter when the
> assembler is
(not really a review ...)
I'm confused because the assembler is invoked when compiling any sort of
source file - C, C++, or .s/.S.
Wouldn't we want assembler flags passed uniformly, no matter when the
assembler is invoked?
It looks like this patch only affects compilation of .s/.S files in hotspot
Hi,
Could I please get a review for this patch which adds a new configure
option --with-extra-asflags? The issue at hand is that we, Red Hat,
need to pass certain extra flags to the assembler when OpenJDK is being
compiled. -Wa,--generate-missing-build-notes=yes in our case. That's
currently not p
+1
Thanks,
Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: build-dev On Behalf Of
> Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Montag, 8. Juli 2019 15:26
> To: Baesken, Matthias ; Thomas Stüfe
>
> Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [CAUTION] RE: 8227389: Remove unsupported
Hi Matthias,
looks good!
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: build-dev On Behalf Of
> Baesken, Matthias
> Sent: Montag, 8. Juli 2019 14:00
> To: Thomas Stüfe
> Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [CAUTION] 8227389: Remove unsuppo
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 2019-06-28 at 14:45 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 28/06/2019 10:52, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 17:36 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > > On 22/05/2019 17:34, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could I please g
Hello, here is a small webrev removing the 2 mentioned options .
When compiling jdk/jdk on AIX (using current xlc16 / xlclang) we run into these
warnings :
warning: 1540-5200 The option "langlvl=c99vla" is not supported. :
This option controls variable length arrays / Enables or disables sup
I think this is fine for 14.
Cheers, Thomas
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:23 AM Baesken, Matthias
wrote:
> Hello, when building jdk/jdk on AIX (using the current default
> xlc16) I get a ton of warnings :
>
> warning: 1540-5200 The option "langlvl=c99vla" is not supported.
> warning: 1540-5
Hello, when building jdk/jdk on AIX (using the current default xlc16) I
get a ton of warnings :
warning: 1540-5200 The option "langlvl=c99vla" is not supported.
warning: 1540-5200 The option "langlvl=noredefmac" is not supported.
The 2 options seem to be gone with the current xlc16
11 matches
Mail list logo
