On 30/07/2019 14:25, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 30/07/2019 09:48, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>> I agree that this is needed. I also understand why Andrew is loath to
>> see changes that are not upstream. However, in this case I don't think
>> we can avoid adding changes that cause a difference from ups
On 30/07/2019 09:48, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 19:30, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 7/29/19 7:37 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> So, in light of the changed build system in JDK 9+, and the rather
>>> small changes in this patch (on the grand scheme of things), it seems
>>> reasonable to imp
On 29/07/2019 19:30, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 7/29/19 7:37 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> So, in light of the changed build system in JDK 9+, and the rather
>> small changes in this patch (on the grand scheme of things), it seems
>> reasonable to implement this feature in the way proposed. It's
