Thank you David!
/Jesper
> On 5 Feb 2020, at 03:37, David Holmes wrote:
>
> Looks good and trivial.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 5/02/2020 12:36 pm, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
>> Hi.
>> I need a review for this tiny change.
>> The "ea" suffix was removed from the JDK 14 version string with JDK-82
Thank you Tim!
/Jesper
> On 5 Feb 2020, at 03:40, Tim Bell wrote:
>
> Jesper:
>
> Looks good to me as well.
>
> Tim
>
> On 2/4/20 6:37 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> Looks good and trivial.
>> Thanks,
>> David
>> On 5/02/2020 12:36 pm, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I need a review fo
Jesper:
Looks good to me as well.
Tim
On 2/4/20 6:37 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Looks good and trivial.
Thanks,
David
On 5/02/2020 12:36 pm, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
Hi.
I need a review for this tiny change.
The "ea" suffix was removed from the JDK 14 version string with
JDK-8236092. Since
Hi.
I need a review for this tiny change.
The "ea" suffix was removed from the JDK 14 version string with JDK-8236092.
Since that change is forwardported to jdk/jdk I need to back it out there.
This is the backout diff as created by hg backout:
diff --git a/make/autoconf/version-numbers b/make/a
Looks good and trivial.
Thanks,
David
On 5/02/2020 12:36 pm, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
Hi.
I need a review for this tiny change.
The "ea" suffix was removed from the JDK 14 version string with JDK-8236092.
Since that change is forwardported to jdk/jdk I need to back it out there.
This is the
Looks good!
In a few comments you refer to the version with just the number 5. Would it be
more correct to write 5.0?
(doc/building.html and doc/building.md)
/Jesper
> On 4 Feb 2020, at 22:48, Magnus Ihse Bursie
> wrote:
>
> Can I have one more hotspot reviewer, please?
>
> /Magnus
>
> On
Can I have one more hotspot reviewer, please?
/Magnus
On 2020-02-03 09:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
JEP 347 "Adopt C++14 Language Features in HotSpot" (JDK-8208089) will
require that all compilers support the C++14 language extension. The
first gcc version to fully support C++14 is 5.0. We ne
On 04/02/2020 17:45, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Does anyone have an opinion on this?
I think this looks okay, would be good if Henry could look at it too as
we've been bitten by changes in this area, I think with Eclipse Tools
that are locating in unusual ways (we think Info.plist). I was happy to
s
Does anyone have an opinion on this?
/Erik
On 2020-01-31 07:31, Erik Joelsson wrote:
In JDK-8235687 the MacOS bundle distribution of the JDK was changed to
conform to Apple requirements by changing Contents/MacOS/libjli.dylib
from a symlink into ../Home/lib/libjli.dylib to a copy of that file.
>
> Hi Erik, maybe we can just rename the configure option to
>
> --enable-stripped-pdbs-for-bundle
>
> AND make the default = no/false .
> Then without setting the configure flag, everything stays as it is for JDK
> vendors/distributors who do not want the stripped pdbs in the bundle.
>
10 matches
Mail list logo