Re: RFR: JDK-8238534

2020-02-13 Thread René Schünemann
Hi Erik and Christoph, thank you for your reviews. The added touch works for me too. I have adapted the suggested whitespace fixes. Here is the updated WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rschuenemann/wr/2020/8238534-macos_sign_bundles/04/ Rene On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:09 PM Erik Joelsson wro

RE: RFR [jdk11]: 8234525: enable link-time section-gc for linux s390x to remove unused code

2020-02-13 Thread Baesken, Matthias
Ping - any reviews ? Thanks, Matthias From: Baesken, Matthias Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2020 10:24 To: jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net; 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' Subject: RFR [jdk11]: 8234525: enable link-time section-gc for linux s390x to remove unused code Hello , please review the d

Re: RFR: 8237192: Generate stripped/public pdbs on Windows for jdk images

2020-02-13 Thread Alan Bateman
On 12/02/2020 22:16, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello Christoph, This patch certainly looks better to me, though I agree it's a bit hackish to have to filter and rename the stripped.pdb files twice, once for jmods and again for bundles. I think I'm ok with it for now though. The future improvement

RFR: 8237566: FindTests.gmk should only include existing TEST.ROOT files

2020-02-13 Thread Erik Helin
Hi all, this small patch changes FindTest.gmk to only include TEST.ROOT files that actually are present. The motivation for this change is that both Git and Mercurial supports so called "sparse" checkouts [0][1] (still somewhat experimental for both, but actively worked on). While experimenti

RFR(S) : 8238943: switch to jtreg 5.0

2020-02-13 Thread Igor Ignatyev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.00 > 10 lines changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 9 mod; Hi all, could you please review the patch which changes jtreg version used in jdk/jdk to the latest and greatest -- jtreg 5.0? and as (recently became) usually, this patch also bumps requiredVersio

Re: RFR(S) : 8238943: switch to jtreg 5.0

2020-02-13 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Igor, The change to langtools/TEST.ROOT is OK. That being said, there are some old entries there which could also be cleaned up (separately?)  These lines probably date from the development of JDK 9 and the evolution of Project Jigsaw. 20 # Use new module options 21 useNewOptions=true

Re: RFR: JDK-8238534

2020-02-13 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good. /Erik On 2020-02-13 01:17, René Schünemann wrote: Hi Erik and Christoph, thank you for your reviews. The added touch works for me too. I have adapted the suggested whitespace fixes. Here is the updated WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rschuenemann/wr/2020/8238534-macos_sign_bun

Re: RFR(S) : 8238943: switch to jtreg 5.0

2020-02-13 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good, but could you change the "version" field to "5.0", it should work now. /Erik On 2020-02-13 08:50, Igor Ignatyev wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.00 10 lines changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 9 mod; Hi all, could you please review the patch which changes jtreg ve

Re: RFR: 8237566: FindTests.gmk should only include existing TEST.ROOT files

2020-02-13 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello Erik, Looks good. Style wise I try to put closing braces for logical blocks on a new line, aligned with the opening brace. I think that helps making the already quite convoluted makefile logic a tad more readable. /Erik On 2020-02-13 04:44, Erik Helin wrote: Hi all, this small patch

Re: RFR(S) : 8238943: switch to jtreg 5.0

2020-02-13 Thread Igor Ignatev
Oh, I’m sorry I actually changed it to 5.0 when were (re)doing testing, and apparently forgot to replace the webrev, the right is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.01 ; with version field value being the only difference b/w .00 and .01 Thanks, — Igor > On Feb 13, 2020, at 9

Re: RFR(S) : 8238943: switch to jtreg 5.0

2020-02-13 Thread Joe Wang
+1 for the change to test/jaxp/TEST.ROOT. Best, Joe On 2/13/20 10:08 AM, Igor Ignatev wrote: Oh, I’m sorry I actually changed it to 5.0 when were (re)doing testing, and apparently forgot to replace the webrev, the right is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.01 ; with versi

Re: RFR(S) : 8238943: switch to jtreg 5.0

2020-02-13 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good. /Erik On 2020-02-13 10:08, Igor Ignatev wrote: Oh, I’m sorry I actually changed it to 5.0 when were (re)doing testing, and apparently forgot to replace the webrev, the right is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.01 ; with version field value being the only diff

Re: RFR: 8239001: Hotspot build broken on linux-sparc after 8238281

2020-02-13 Thread Kim Barrett
> On Feb 13, 2020, at 7:26 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > > Hello! > > Hotspot fails to build on linux-sparc after 8238281 due to the redefinition > of offset_of() in src/hotspot/share/prims/jvm.cpp [1]: > > /home/glaubitz/jdk/src/hotspot/cpu/sparc/macroAssembler_sparc.hpp: In static

RE: RFR: JDK-8238534

2020-02-13 Thread Langer, Christoph
Great. I'll push it tomorrow. /Christoph > -Original Message- > From: Erik Joelsson > Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2020 18:18 > To: René Schünemann ; Langer, Christoph > > Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8238534 > > Looks good. > > /Erik > > On 2020-02-13 01:1

Re: RFR [jdk11]: 8234525: enable link-time section-gc for linux s390x to remove unused code

2020-02-13 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 13/02/2020 11:48, Baesken, Matthias wrote: > Ping - any reviews ? > > Thanks, Matthias > > From: Baesken, Matthias > Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2020 10:24 > To: jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net; 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' > > Subject: RFR [jdk11]: 8234525: enable link-time section-gc f

Re: RFR: 8239001: Hotspot build broken on linux-sparc after 8238281

2020-02-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
I searched the code base for mentions of old gcc workarounds, and tried to remedy them now that they were not needed. If it turns out that they still were needed, by all means, revert that part of the patch. /Magnus 13 feb. 2020 kl. 20:35 skrev Kim Barrett : >> On Feb 13, 2020, at 7:26 AM,

RFR: JDK-8239019: testmake fails with FATAL: VCS_TYPE is empty

2020-02-13 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello, The fix to make idea.sh support both git and mercurial had the unfortunate side effect of bailing out completely if neither was found. This happens to be the case when we run our build system tests (which includes running idea.sh) in our distributed test environment. I think idea.sh sh

Re: RFR: 8239001: Hotspot build broken on linux-sparc after 8238281

2020-02-13 Thread Kim Barrett
> On Feb 13, 2020, at 5:21 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie > wrote: > > I searched the code base for mentions of old gcc workarounds, and tried to > remedy them now that they were not needed. > > If it turns out that they still were needed, by all means, revert that part > of the patch. I think the

RFR: 8239026: Support non-maven artifacts by JibArtifactManager

2020-02-13 Thread Leonid Mesnik
Hi Could you please review following fix which extend JibArtifactManager to support download and installation of artifacts with layout different from maven style. It is planned that user provide name and properties to resolve layout using default or jib manager. There are no tests which use th