Update: JEP drafted (was: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] OpenJDK extension to AArch64 and Windows)

2020-07-02 Thread Monica Beckwith
Hello all, Here’s our JEP: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248496.Thank you all so much for helping us out with the process. We also have refined our changesets, and we are in the process of attaching them to the umbrella bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248238. @Dalib

Re: RFR: JDK-8248667 Need support for building native libraries located in the test/lib directory

2020-07-02 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
Sorry if you get this twice, but I seem to have problem reaching the mailing list. > On 2020-07-02 16:26, Chris Plummer wrote: > Hi Mangus, > > Can you leave out libLingeredApp.c. It will conflict with the version I plan > on pushing. Chris, You can just remove it, or replace the contents wit

Re: RFR: JDK-8248667 Need support for building native libraries located in the test/lib directory

2020-07-02 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good. /Erik On 2020-07-01 15:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Chris has requested help to add native test code to the test lib. From the bug report: "As part of the work for JDK-8248194 I'm adding a native method to LingeredApp.c. The native method will be located in:    test/lib/jdk/te

Re: RFR[16] 8248495: [macos] zerovm is broken due to libffi headers location

2020-07-02 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2020-07-02 11:13, Vladimir Kempik wrote: Hello Thanks for looking into this Here is updated webrev. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vkempik/8248495/webrev.03/ Regards, Vladimir. Thank you. Now it looks good. /Magnus 1 июля 2020 г., в 21:59, Erik Joelsson написал(а): I think this looks ok,

Re: RFR[16] 8248495: [macos] zerovm is broken due to libffi headers location

2020-07-02 Thread Vladimir Kempik
Hello Thanks for looking into this Here is updated webrev. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vkempik/8248495/webrev.03/ Regards, Vladimir. > 1 июля 2020 г., в 21:59, Erik Joelsson написал(а): > > I think this looks ok, but would like Magnus' input as he is already involved > in this review. > > /E

Re: RFR: JDK-8248158 Configure fails with autoconf not found even though it's installed

2020-07-02 Thread Galder Zamarreno
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:37 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie < magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 2020-07-01 12:05, Galder Zamarreno wrote: > > Using `which` to check whether commands exist can result in confusing > > errors when `which` itself is not installed in the system. This is the > case

Re: RFR: JDK-8248158 Configure fails with autoconf not found even though it's installed

2020-07-02 Thread Galder Zamarreno
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:30 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie < magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 2020-07-01 12:05, Galder Zamarreno wrote: > > Using `which` to check whether commands exist can result in confusing > > errors when `which` itself is not installed in the system. This is the > case >

Re: RFR: JDK-8248158 Configure fails with autoconf not found even though it's installed

2020-07-02 Thread Galder Zamarreno
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:37 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie < magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 2020-07-01 12:05, Galder Zamarreno wrote: > > Using `which` to check whether commands exist can result in confusing > > errors when `which` itself is not installed in the system. This is the > case