On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:25:32 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> We have a handful of assembly files in the JDK. They have long been left
> aside, with a "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" attitude.
>
> In the current panama-vector, there is a lot more assembly files incoming,
> including for th
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:49:42 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote:
> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port.
>
> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and
> windows/aarch64.
>
> Major changes are in:
> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the new ca
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:33:50 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by luhenry (Author).
>
>> > > > [ Back-porting this patch to JDK 11] depends on the will of openjdk11
>> > > > maintainers to accept this (and few other, like jep-388, as we depend
>> > > > on it) contribution.
>> > >
> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port.
>
> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and
> windows/aarch64.
>
> Major changes are in:
> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the new calling convention (subtasks
> JDK-8253817, JDK-8253818)
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:25:32 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> We have a handful of assembly files in the JDK. They have long been left
> aside, with a "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" attitude.
>
> In the current panama-vector, there is a lot more assembly files incoming,
> including for th
We have a handful of assembly files in the JDK. They have long been left aside,
with a "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" attitude.
In the current panama-vector, there is a lot more assembly files incoming,
including for the Windows platforrm, which has not existed for a long time in
the JDK.
