On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 12:57:25 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> It is currently both tricky and tedious to figure out what went wrong when a
>> jtreg test fails in GHA.
>>
>> We should utilize the full potential of GitHub Action summaries and error
>> annotations to make finding failures easier and mo
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:45:16 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Sorry but I have to ask why this test was created as a C++ program instead of
> keeping it as a C program likes it predecessors? No need for C++ libs or
> special exception handling flags in that case.
The idea was to reduce d
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:48:05 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Let me ask the obvious "dumb" question ... why does this have to be so
> complicated? Why isn't the name of the test simply passed through to jtreg as
> typed?
Is it because `#` is treated as comment by the shell? Could it be encoded by
s
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:54:47 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
> Could I have a review of PR that removes a printStackTrace() for the jfr
> tool.
>
> Testing: jdk/jfr/tool
>
> Thanks
> Erik
Marked as reviewed by mgronlun (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/9018
On Thu, 26 May 2022 12:04:41 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> With this PR, the overview of failures are presented on the "Summary" page
> for the action (the top-most line to the left, with the outline house icon).
@magicus, thank you. This is really useful. I didn't even know that this
"Summ
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 01:51:20 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> One can select a testcase by ID when running a jtreg test case directly from
> jtreg (using the testcase.java#testID syntax). However, this has not been
> possible to do when launching jtreg indirectly from make.
>
> This fix attempts to ad
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 01:51:20 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> One can select a testcase by ID when running a jtreg test case directly from
> jtreg (using the testcase.java#testID syntax). However, this has not been
> possible to do when launching jtreg indirectly from make.
>
> This fix attempts to ad
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 07:56:38 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote:
> Fixed JtregNativeJdk.gmk to include c++ libs for NullCallerTest
Hi Tim,
Sorry but I have to ask why this test was created as a C++ program instead of
keeping it as a C program likes it predecessors? No need for C++ libs or
special excepti
