Re: RFR: JDK-8066474: Remove the lib/$ARCH directory from Linux and Solaris images

2016-11-21 Thread Alan Burlison
coded into the Solaris kernel, and is covered by a cross-product engineering contract. In the case of jexec that contract needs modifying, what I don't know is if there are any other similar cross-product dependencies that will be affected by this change. -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: JDK-8166937: [Solaris] Missing libjvm_db.so and libjvm_dtrace.so from JDK 9 b138

2016-10-12 Thread Alan Burlison
On 12/10/2016 10:10, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166937 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8166937/webrev.01/ Looks good to me. Ditto. -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: 8166189: Fix for Bug 8165524 breaks AIX build

2016-09-29 Thread Alan Burlison
nd on. Volker was instead proposing what you describe. Ah right, in which case we are in violent agreement ;-) -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: 8166189: Fix for Bug 8165524 breaks AIX build

2016-09-29 Thread Alan Burlison
t see what the problem is, to be honest. -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: JDK-8165163 Solaris11 and onwards provide CUPS by default, references to csw and sfw versions should be removed

2016-09-21 Thread Alan Burlison
On 06/09/2016 08:37, Alan Burlison wrote: On 01/09/2016 14:39, Alan Burlison wrote: On 01/09/2016 14:28, Erik Joelsson wrote: Again, did you generate the html readme from the markdown version? No, hand edited - I wasn't aware of how this was done. I'll do that and respin

Re: RFR for JDK-8165482 java in ldoms, with cpu-arch=generic has problems

2016-09-21 Thread Alan Burlison
pretty standard. That package is in the devkit and I verified that libdevinfo.so is there too. It's a standard system library, the manpage is here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E53394_01/html/E54772/libdevinfo-3lib.html -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: JDK-8165161 Solaris: /usr/ccs /opt/sfw and /opt/csw are dead, references should be expunged

2016-09-06 Thread Alan Burlison
On 01/09/2016 18:43, Alan Burlison wrote: I posted this originally on build-dev, it was suggested I should also post it to core-libs-dev for review of some of the changes. /usr/ccs /opt/sfw and /opt/csw are all obsolete and should be removed from the Solaris-related build infrastructure. Bug

Re: RFR: JDK-8165163 Solaris11 and onwards provide CUPS by default, references to csw and sfw versions should be removed

2016-09-06 Thread Alan Burlison
On 01/09/2016 14:39, Alan Burlison wrote: On 01/09/2016 14:28, Erik Joelsson wrote: Again, did you generate the html readme from the markdown version? No, hand edited - I wasn't aware of how this was done. I'll do that and respin the webrev - thanks! Can someone sponsor this cha

RFR: JDK-8165161 Solaris: /usr/ccs /opt/sfw and /opt/csw are dead, references should be expunged

2016-09-01 Thread Alan Burlison
/JDK-8165161 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanbur/JDK-8165161/ JPRT hotspot tests all pass. Thanks, -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: JDK-8165161 Solaris: /usr/ccs /opt/sfw and /opt/csw are dead, references should be expunged

2016-09-01 Thread Alan Burlison
On 01/09/2016 14:42, Alan Burlison wrote: It doesn't look like the changes in README-builds.md match README-builds.html exactly. Did you regenerate the html version using markdown (see common/bin/update-build-readme.sh)? Same here as for JDK-8165163 - I'll do that and respin the web

Re: RFR: JDK-8165161 Solaris: /usr/ccs /opt/sfw and /opt/csw are dead, references should be expunged

2016-09-01 Thread Alan Burlison
brev The rest of the autoconf and makefile changes look ok to me. For the changes in other areas, you will need to send the review to each team. Not sure who owns what file here, but core-libs should probably cover most of it. OK, I'll start there - thanks. -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: JDK-8165163 Solaris11 and onwards provide CUPS by default, references to csw and sfw versions should be removed

2016-09-01 Thread Alan Burlison
On 01/09/2016 14:28, Erik Joelsson wrote: Again, did you generate the html readme from the markdown version? No, hand edited - I wasn't aware of how this was done. I'll do that and respin the webrev - thanks! -- Alan Burlison --

RFR: JDK-8165163 Solaris11 and onwards provide CUPS by default, references to csw and sfw versions should be removed

2016-09-01 Thread Alan Burlison
As of Solaris 11 the printing implementation has been CUPS, references to the obsolete SFW and CSW CUPS packages should be removed. Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165163 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanbur/JDK-8165163 JPRT hotspot tests all pass. -- Alan Burlison --

RFR: JDK-8165161 Solaris: /usr/ccs /opt/sfw and /opt/csw are dead, references should be expunged

2016-09-01 Thread Alan Burlison
/usr/ccs /opt/sfw and /opt/csw are all obsolete and should be removed from the Solaris-related build infrastructure. Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165161 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanbur/JDK-8165161/ JPRT hotspot tests all pass. -- Alan Burlison --

Re: Creating IPS packages on Solaris

2016-07-28 Thread Alan Burlison
On 28/07/2016 11:15, Seán Coffey wrote: such packages are not in the scope of the OpenJDK project. I'll ping you offline with some contacts. Any reason why that's the case? All the tools needed to build IPS packages are available as standard on Solaris. -- Alan Burlison --

Re: [9] RFR: 8160873: (cs) JDK9 Build failure on Hindi locale

2016-07-21 Thread Alan Burlison
formatting test failures. Manually setting LC_CTYPE=C before running 'make tests' fixes the problem. It's on my list to fix... -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: JDK-8161057 Solaris: deprecated/obsolete compiler flags should be removed

2016-07-20 Thread Alan Burlison
#x27;ve sent you a patch with the change above included. Thanks, -- Alan Burlison --

Re: RFR: JDK-8161057 Solaris: deprecated/obsolete compiler flags should be removed

2016-07-20 Thread Alan Burlison
pointing to the job. For other testsets, yes they are transient/intermittent failures. The "-testset hostpot" run was clean, it was "-testset core" that failed, with errors in the same areas that I've seen in other unrelated runs. -- Alan Burlison --

RFR: JDK-8161057 Solaris: deprecated/obsolete compiler flags should be removed

2016-07-19 Thread Alan Burlison
forms I believe they can be ignored. There is some related cleanup in deploy, that will be covered by https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8161081, by removing the Solaris-related scripts. -- Alan Burlison --