On 12/16/2015 5:40 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 17/12/2015 7:35 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
One more thing, where should this fix be pushed? Do you need it urgently
in hs-rt?
It is urgently needed in both the hs-rt and hs-comp repos as it
affects nightly testing and JPRT. If Alejandro agrees I
ue, 03 Nov 2015 10:45:31 -0700
From: Alejandro E Murillo <alejandro.muri...@oracle.com>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
To: hotspot-dev <hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net>, core-libs-dev Libs
<core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net>
CC: verona-...@openjdk.java.net
Please revie
Please review the webrev below for this enhancement:
8132947: Add tier2, tier2 and tier1_2 testsets to jprt.properties
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/9/8132947/
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132947
Thanks
--
Alejandro
On 8/4/2015 1:11 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
On 4/08/2015 4:56 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
Please review the webrev below for this enhancement:
8132947: Add tier2, tier2 and tier1_2 testsets to jprt.properties
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/9/8132947/
bug: https
Holmes wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
On 4/08/2015 4:56 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
Please review the webrev below for this enhancement:
8132947: Add tier2, tier2 and tier1_2 testsets to jprt.properties
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/9/8132947/
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse
Thanks Dan.
Will check why the patch is empty.
Alejandro
On 7/21/2015 12:57 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 7/20/15 6:45 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
Please review the following change that allows setting
the Hotspot minor version and build number to that
of the --with-update-version
On 7/20/2015 7:01 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
On 21/07/2015 10:45 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
Please review the following change that allows setting
the Hotspot minor version and build number to that
of the --with-update-version and --with-build-number
configure parameters when
On 7/20/2015 7:10 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
On 21/07/2015 10:45 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
Please review the following change that allows setting
the Hotspot minor version and build number to that
of the --with-update-version and --with-build-number
configure parameters when
Please review the following change that allows setting
the Hotspot minor version and build number to that
of the --with-update-version and --with-build-number
configure parameters when provided. 8u builds only.
webrev:
http://javaweb.us.oracle.com/~amurillo/webrevs/8079410/
Background (since
We need to backout this change JDK-8098834:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8098834
as it is impeding the execution of some jprt tests for
control jobs and hence the integration of jdk9/hs into jdk9/dev
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/9/8130092/
CR:
sounds good David
Thanks
Alejandro
On 6/29/2015 6:34 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Looks good Alejandro!
We'll work with Dmitry to figure out the problem.
Thanks,
David
On 30/06/2015 10:31 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
We need to backout this change JDK-8098834:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net
On 6/10/2015 6:13 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-10 11:58, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
Generally looks good - a few comments/queries below.
In general, I believe most issues you found are valid. :-) However, as
I said before in this thread, I'd like to see them resolved in the
Thanks for quickly fixing this Erik,
reran the snapshot and everything built fine
Alejandro
On 2/16/2015 4:08 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/02/2015 10:57, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
When merging jdk9/dev and jdk9/hs, the following message appears and
the build fails:
gmake[2]: *** No
by the timing when this started to happen, I believe
this was caused by the CPU changes integrated into jdk9/dev
on Wednesday (they didn't come through jdk9/hs).
I went to check those changesets and this looks like the prime suspect:
Changeset: c656c7540cb1
Author:gthornbr
Date:
On 10/30/2014 7:32 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2014-10-30 13:52, David Holmes wrote:
On 30/10/2014 10:42 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I think it would fail in JPRT too, I never ran JPRT with JDK-8062159
unfortunately. I assume very few people run jdk9-dev in JPRT with
embedded platforms.
All
Thanks Vladimir
Alejandro
On 4/23/2014 11:53 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Looks good.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 4/22/14 7:32 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
On 4/22/2014 6:12 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
On 4/22/14 4:42 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
On 4/21/2014 1:18 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote
On 4/24/2014 2:52 PM, John Coomes wrote:
Alejandro E Murillo (alejandro.muri...@oracle.com) wrote:
...
I think I incorporated all the changes David, John and you suggested and
started some sanity testing;
Here's is the latest webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/9/8030011/
Please
for the feedback!
Alejandro
Regards,
Vladimir
On 4/21/14 10:13 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
On 4/18/2014 6:50 PM, John Coomes wrote:
Alejandro E Murillo (alejandro.muri...@oracle.com) wrote:
Please review this change to make the hotspot related output
produced by
java -version
match
On 4/22/2014 6:12 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
On 4/22/14 4:42 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
On 4/21/2014 1:18 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
I don't think we need to rename make/hotspot_version file. It is still
used to set JVM's version string and not JDK's version.
Next
On 4/18/2014 6:50 PM, John Coomes wrote:
Alejandro E Murillo (alejandro.muri...@oracle.com) wrote:
Please review this change to make the hotspot related output produced by
java -version
match the corresponding JDK output:
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/9/8030011/
Bug: https
to
HOTSPOT_RELEASE_VERSION,
we just don't get those values by parsing it, so we just pass those
values to the vm_version.cpp,
since they are already defined in the makefiles. The format of the JDK
version is not that fixed.
Thanks
Alejandro
David
On 10/04/2014 10:15 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote
Please review this change to make the hotspot related output produced by
java -version
match the corresponding JDK output:
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/9/8030011/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030011
Note that we initially wanted to obtain more information
Hi David,
since the hoptspot version should match the jdk version,
I actually plan to remove this file as part of the fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030011
and set those values appropriately
thanks
Alejandro
On 12/19/2013 12:14 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Joe,
On 12/19/2013 6:15 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 20/12/2013 2:22 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
Hi David,
since the hoptspot version should match the jdk version,
I actually plan to remove this file as part of the fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030011
and set those values
On 6/17/2013 6:22 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 06/17/2013 05:21 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
On 6/17/13 4:02 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Rule #1 Nobody reads the README
Rule #2 When things go wrong, blame the README
I of course have no objection to the change, however, I'm not
convinced it will
25 matches
Mail list logo
