On Thu, 12 May 2022 20:59:53 GMT, Michael Hall wrote:
> However, I don't know how the app is supposed to be started without a
> launcher...
jpackage supplies an alternative launcher that doesn't have plist.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8666
On Thu, 12 May 2022 04:15:50 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
>> - It is not possible to support native JDK commands such as "java" inside
>> Mac App Store bundles due to embedded info.plist. Workarounds suggested in
>> JDK-8286122 does not seems to be visible.
>> - With proposed fix we will enf
On Mon, 9 May 2022 23:18:47 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> The way LauncherCommon.gmk is currently written, it's only meant to be
> included from "make/module//Launcher.gmk", or at least only from one
> single place for each module. This is because the man page generation that
> happens in Launch
On Thu, 5 May 2022 19:02:51 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Copy missing manifest-related parameters to `SetupJdkExecutable` calls
> building app launchers from `SetupBuildLauncher`
> function:https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/0c3094c8186b4d53e8bad80e2369fc7b9ae9e201/make/commo
Copy missing manifest-related parameters to `SetupJdkExecutable` calls building
app launchers from `SetupBuildLauncher`
function:https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/0c3094c8186b4d53e8bad80e2369fc7b9ae9e201/make/common/modules/LauncherCommon.gmk#L174-L175
-
Commit messages:
- 828467
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 23:37:06 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Implementation of [JDK-8275062: "Allow jpackage create installers for
> services"](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8275062)
> CSR
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: b675c597
Author:A
> Implementation of [JDK-8275062: "Allow jpackage create installers for
> services"](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8275062)
> CSR
Alexey Semenyuk has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 121
Implementation of [JDK-8275062: "Allow jpackage create installers for
services"](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8275062)
CSR
-
Commit messages:
- Whitespace cleanup
- Whitespace cleanup
- JDK-8236128: Allow jpackage create installers for services
- Sync l10n files. Fix
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 03:26:51 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> 8277429: Conflicting jpackage static library name
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: e3911a85
Author: Alexey Semenyuk
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/e3911a8532e9b93ba5e65c613bd79864485db
8277429: Conflicting jpackage static library name
-
Commit messages:
- 8277429: Conflicting jpackage static library name
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6485/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=6485&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:00:53 GMT, Andy Herrick wrote:
> Restoring fix to JDK-8248904: Add support to jpackage for the Mac App Store.
Marked as reviewed by asemenyuk (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3172
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:47:49 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Remove accidently added Linux build flags
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: ad525bcd
Author: Alexey Semenyuk
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/ad525bcd
Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0
Remove accidently added Linux build flags
-
Commit messages:
- 8261281: Linking jdk.jpackage fails for linux aarch32 builds after 8254702
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2459/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=2459&range=00
Issue: https://b
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:33:40 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254702
>
> The fix splits Linux app launcher in app launcher and launcher shared lib.
> App launcher is pure C and doesn't have C++ code. App launcher lib
> in
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 18:35:54 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>>> "common" was perfectly enough until this change. Unfortunately we cant just
>>> drop new C sources in "common" dir because we don't want them to be
>>> comp
Linux and launcher code on other
> platforms.
> - `applaunchercommon`: code shared between launcher and launcher lib on Linux
> and launcher code on other platforms.
Alexey Semenyuk has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
825
Linux and launcher code on other
> platforms.
> - `applaunchercommon`: code shared between launcher and launcher lib on Linux
> and launcher code on other platforms.
Alexey Semenyuk has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
825
Linux and launcher code on other
> platforms.
> - `applaunchercommon`: code shared between launcher and launcher lib on Linux
> and launcher code on other platforms.
Alexey Semenyuk has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- 82547
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 18:24:23 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> "common" was perfectly enough until this change. Unfortunately we cant just
>> drop new C sources in "common" dir because we don't want them to be compiled
>> with g++. That is why need new common directory (applauncherlibcommon) for C
>
Linux and launcher code on other
> platforms.
> - `applaunchercommon`: code shared between launcher and launcher lib on Linux
> and launcher code on other platforms.
Alexey Semenyuk has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
825
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:19:56 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Alexey Semenyuk has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
>> previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show
>> differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull reques
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:16:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Alexey Semenyuk has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
>> previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show
>> differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull reques
Linux and launcher code on other
> platforms.
> - `applaunchercommon`: code shared between launcher and launcher lib on Linux
> and launcher code on other platforms.
Alexey Semenyuk has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. The incremen
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:00:32 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254702
>>
>> The fix splits Linux app launcher in app launcher and launcher shared lib.
>> App launcher is pure C and doesn't have C++ code. App launcher lib
>> incorporates bulk of C++ code
Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254702
The fix splits Linux app launcher in app launcher and launcher shared lib. App
launcher is pure C and doesn't have C++ code. App launcher lib incorporates
bulk of C++ code from app launcher.
At startup app launcher loads launcher shared l
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:33:40 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254702
>
> The fix splits Linux app launcher in app launcher and launcher shared lib.
> App launcher is pure C and doesn't have C++ code. App launcher lib
> in
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:48:40 GMT, Andy Herrick wrote:
>> JDK-8252870: Finalize (remove "incubator" from) jpackage
>
> Andy Herrick has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> JDK-8252870: Finalize (remove "incubator" from) jpackage
>
On 2020-04-23 11:38, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
Erik,
Please review updated patch with the suggested improvements at [1].
The webrev includes only incremental changes to
Lib-jdk.incubator.jpackage.gmk for clarity.
[1]
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asemenyuk/8242302/webrev.01/webrev.01/index.html
$(filter-out -MD, $1) -MT
/Erik
On 2020-04-15 13:13, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
Please review fix [2] for jpackage bug [1].
Refactor jpackage native code.
- Improve code reuse between different platforms.
- Replace custom string classes with the standard std::basic_string.
- Merge functionality of li
all support C++11 for several years already.
[1] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+Build+Platforms
- Alexey
On 3/3/2020 7:29 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
On Mar 3, 2020, at 4:49 PM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
How about C++11? I have a pending patch for jpackage that depends on C++11
How about C++11? I have a pending patch for jpackage that depends on
C++11 features that I hesitate to pull in jdk15.
- Alexey
On 3/3/2020 5:22 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:26 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 3/2/20 10:46 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
As lead of the 8 and 11 up
Yes, I did a test build.
- Alexey
On 12/11/2019 1:48 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Looks OK. I presume you did a test build in our build system ?
-phil
On 12/11/19 10:46 AM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
Please review fix [2] for jpackage bug [1].
- adds $(X_CFLAGS) to compiler command line.
Patch
Please review fix [2] for jpackage bug [1].
- adds $(X_CFLAGS) to compiler command line.
Patch contributed by Arthur Eubanks (aeuba...@google.com).
- Alexey
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235728
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asemenyuk/8235728/webrev.00
Andy,
I've created the following CRs to track the findings:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223325
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223323
- Alexey
On 5/2/2019 5:08 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
Alexey:
Please file Bugs for these two issues.
/Andy
On 5/2/2019 1:49 PM, A
g the heat.exe tool on the
application image.
Scott
On May 2, 2019, at 5:08 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
Alexey:
Please file Bugs for these two issues.
/Andy
On 5/2/2019 1:49 PM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
Some findings:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8212780/webrev.ea6/raw_files/new/make/lau
Some findings:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8212780/webrev.ea6/raw_files/new/make/launcher/Launcher-jdk.jpackage.gmk:
I think definitions of BUILD_JPACKAGE_APPLAUNCHEREXE and
BUILD_JPACKAGE_APPLAUNCHERWEXE targets should be moved to
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8212780/webrev.ea6/
ice to not break things first. Some
contributors continually pull OpenJDK changes and run them through
their own build and test systems.
Thanks,
David
/Magnus
Thanks,
David
On 30/03/2017 2:21 AM, alexey semenyuk wrote:
Please review and approve enhancement for JDK10.
Bug: https://bugs.
Please review and approve enhancement for JDK10.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-810
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asemenyuk/810/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Alexey
Erik,
Looks good.
Thanks,
Alexey
On 29.06.2016 16:01, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
A while ago, in JDK-8155689, a workaround was put in place because a
temporary broken Jib configuration file. The Jib configuration has
since been fixed and the workaround can now safely be removed.
Bug: htt
39 matches
Mail list logo
