I see that the jdk7 source snapshots page shows b111 while the binary page
b110.
Does this mean that the binaries are not yet complete, or that the binaries
page is simply not yet updated?
Also, the change list only contains the one issue. Is that in order to not
mix compiler/build changes with cod
FWIW, Windows 7 "Enterprise" is supposed to ship with Microsoft's Unix
compatibility bits, so conceivably no MKS or Cygwin would be required.
David
-Original Message-
From: build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
[mailto:build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Erik Trimble
Sent: We
> Subject: Re: JDK build questions
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:24, David Dabbs wrote:
> >
> > On the premise that building my own binaries could yield performance
> > improvements versus the Sun(Oracle)-provided binaries I've decided to
> > tinker with bu
nce differences versus the Sun(Oracle)-provided binary to
justify the effort?
* I have recently been tinkering with Intel's memory allocator and TCMalloc,
etc.
Would compiling with these be expected to a) even work and b) yield perf
improvements worth the effort.
Thank you,
David Dabbs
