Re: Help me to build openjdk on my machine

ieren! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone -- John Yeary -- http://javaevangelist.blogspot.com http://www.johnyeary.com *@jyeary* "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor

Re: prebuild Oracle VM appliance

ey're actually mostly the work of someone else (since Kelly has only, what 100 things on his plate now?) [ObDisclaimer: I do not officially speak for Oracle, and none of the statements in this email should be taken as official Oracle commitments or policies] -- Erik Trimble Java P

Re: prebuild Oracle VM appliance

neither of them have free distribution licenses. Note that I can't promise anything, other than that I'll look at making our VM images available. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: How can I include Rhino in the build

On 6/2/2011 6:12 PM, Charles Lee wrote: On 06/02/2011 11:45 PM, Erik Trimble wrote: On 6/2/2011 3:18 AM, Charles Lee wrote: Hi guys, I have checkout the mercurial forest from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/. But I can not have Rhino in the build. Do I miss any repository? If you

Re: How can I include Rhino in the build

etely separate piece of software, and has no relation to the OpenJDK project. It is not hosted on the openjdk servers. It is not needed to build OpenJDK. If you are interested in Rhino, you do NOT have to build the JDK from scratch - you can use a pre-build OpenJDK binary. -- Erik Trimble

Re: Build portability: enable or disable warnings

On 5/18/2011 12:23 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: On 07:25 Mon 16 May , Erik Trimble wrote: On 5/16/2011 6:03 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 05/16/2011 12:08 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: The reason I'm asking is that I'm wondering if this is something we should expect to crop up in

Re: Build portability: enable or disable warnings

ot;ignore all built-in options" ? e.g.gcc -Wignore-everything-built-in and not just override things one at a time? -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: Build portability: enable or disable warnings

x27;re saying that by running *just* the 'gcc' command on different linux systems, that actually implies that gcc gets invoked with some set of flags already set? And, that there's no way to just invoke "vanilla" gcc ? If so, that's, ah, mindboggling (not in a good wa

Re: Request for review: do not use --sync with df during sanity check

The patch was originally written by Andrew John Hughes (ahug...@redhat.com) and we have had this in icedtea6 for almost a year now. Thanks, Omair Let's see if you do better than I did... http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2010-June/003056.html -- Erik Trimble Java System

Re: Request for review: support building hotspot with gcc 4.6

ave a good reason to cause such breakage). -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA

Re: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

etter and try to contain references to them in the specific component that is relevant. I don't want to see more any more component-specific stuff than absolutely necessary. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA

Re: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

On 4/25/2011 4:49 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: On Apr 25, 2011, at 3:46 AM, Erik Trimble wrote: It would be a good idea to get this done as one of the first things, that way, it makes it easier to attract new forks. Right now, the barrier to help is quite high. Attract new forks? What does

Re: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

nsider using a tool like cmake to manage the build? > > > Cheers > > On 25 avr. 2011, at 12:46, Erik Trimble > wrote: > > > > > On 4/24/2011 10:12 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > > > > > > FYI... > > > >

Re: Fwd: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

d by this, I give it a very big +1. YES. I'd also like to add that an additional goal could be: * full documentation of the design (as well as the process) of the build It would be a good idea to get this done as one of the first things, that way, it makes it easier to attract new forks.

Re: How to check out the openjdk source code from the mercurial repositories

ation of other software. However, it would certainly be a good place to have a Sanity Check - have the install script check for all the required software dependencies, and then spit out a summary of what you have, and what you are missing. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA

Re: How to check out the openjdk source code from the mercurial repositories

it is possible to maintain a system where a perpetual reference to a particular state of the JDK repository can be made). What other *DESIGN* goals do people see should have for the JDK repository? -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA

Re: Need reviewer: No fastdebug builds by default

634: By default, only build the product bits with a closed jdk build (like openjdk does) http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-nofastdebug/webrev/ -kto I'm assuming there will be modifications to JPRT to allow it to continue to build fastdebug, with a proper option to the jp

Re: Need reviewer and comments

ion appears to no longer be a part of the official Hg distribution - that is, it's been abandoned as part of the main Hg codebase. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: hotspot build problems

On 12/11/2010 1:38 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Erik Trimble wrote: On 12/10/2010 1:24 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: Regarding the HPI-problem I only have a wild guess. Recently there was a change which removed HPI (see: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase

Re: hotspot build problems

point, so can't see any issue with using any reasonably recent JDK6 or OpenJDK6 build as the bootstrap. -Erik Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: static linking of libgcc on linux ?

; | $(CUT) -d'.' -f1) ifeq ("$(CC_VER_MAJOR)", "3") OTHER_LDFLAGS += -static-libgcc endif Now we build with gcc 4 we actually don't set -static-libgcc. Can someone comment on the correctness of this - should we instead be checking for "ifneq ("$(CC_VER_MAJO

Re: Compiling awt with -Od

would impact your entire build effort, not just that section. You might look in the relevant Makefile for that variable, and just change it. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA

Re: Reducing overall amount of OpenJDK source code

nderstanding of what you are doing is very likely to severely impact performance. I realize you had focused on portions of the Library section of the JDK, but be aware that the JDK is not just the Libraries. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA

Re: Visual Studio 2010

" but its a real problem when you need to go further. -phil. -- *Pete Brunet* a11ysoft - Accessibility Architecture and Development (512) 238-6967 (work), (512) 689-4155 (cell) Skype: pete.brunet IM: ptbrunet (AOL, Google), ptbru...@live.com (MSN) ht

Re: Visual Studio 2010

eam to OK the switch - there are other stakeholders which have to OK it too. Kelly will have to speak as to the official adoption of VS2010 when it actually happens. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA

Re: building and using tests?

" directories should suffice for the vast majority of folks - they're fairly comprehensive, and cover a lot of ground. If they're not good enough, well, might I direct you over here to the licensee-section of the company -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: Cross Compiling for x86_64 on x86

install to Hard Drive, you can still do a build when booted from LiveCD. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: Cross Compiling for x86_64 on x86

ried doing Windows 64-bit on a 32-bit platform, and I can't imagine it would really be easy at all. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: How to speed up Hotspot Build

Y=false export BUILD_J2SE=false export DEV_ONLY=true export SKIP_DEBUG_BUILD=false export SKIP_FASTDEBUG_BUILD=true == Any ideas on how to tune this to speed up the build? Or, are there problems with the script? Thanks! Peng Du 2/7/2009 -- Erik Trimble Java System

Re: Building on Win 2008

ow is a big issue, as MS has issued updated ones in the meantime. This isn't so much a problem for Sun, as we keep copies lying around, but for our Community-at-large, who need the ability to find the tools we specify when doing a build of their own. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Ma

Re: Building on Win 2008

;s some of the fluff around the edges that is missing, like ATL and MFC, and maybe performance feedback optimization (which we do not use). -kto Phil Race wrote: Erik Trimble wrote: I know there's been a lot of exploration on this topic, as yes, being able to use just the free MS SDK a

Re: Building on Win 2008

Anthony Petrov wrote: On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote: I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely easy.

Re: Building on Win 2008

Dalibor Topic wrote: Erik Trimble wrote: Also, Cygwin is the UNIX-ism platform of choice, and getting the JDK to build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP, and Win2003) would be a _huge_ deal. I.e. using the gcc provided by Cygwin and the 'posixy' libc i

Re: Building on Win 2008

ng the JDK to build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP, and Win2003) would be a _huge_ deal. Particularly if someone can get JDK 6 and/or 5 to build using only Cygwin. There - enough for you to do? -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x1

Re: Can somebody sanity-check me here?

ld of the full JDK can always be found in the http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7 forest of repositories. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: Recommended GCC version?

or maintainability. As I don't see any real benefit not easily obtainable otherwise by allowing many different compiler versions, I vote for maintainability as the more important feature. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: Recommended GCC version?

t on, to avoid duplication of effort and needless waste of time. These standardized versions should be periodically reviewed of course for consideration of being updated, but I'd think no more often than yearly, if that. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: OpenJDK on Solaris Dev Express 1/2008?

rk, but you'd definitely have to spend a bit of time doing so. Maybe the next logical campaign is to avoid the Sun Studio trap then... :) -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: OpenJDK on Solaris Dev Express 1/2008?

isms which the JDK does not currently support. That said, it would not be terribly difficult to modify the source to get GCC to work, but you'd definitely have to spend a bit of time doing so. Sadly, C compilers are not interchangeable. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: JDK 6 Project

ng to this message with either Tim -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)

Re: Upcoming OpenJDK infrastructure projects

to build Windows software using > a Free-as-in-speech compiler; using a free-as-in-beer compiler is fine for > non-free platforms.) > > I'd hoped to begin work on these myself at some point, though I'm pretty > busy yet. :-( > > -Dan Note that I don't speak