Re: RFR: 8265702: ZGC on macOS/aarch64 [v2]

2021-04-22 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:43:45 GMT, Per Liden wrote: >> This patch enables ZGC on macOS/aarch64. It does three things: >> 1) Enables building of ZGC on this platform. >> 2) Adds `os::processor_id()`, which for now always returns 0. >> 3) Fixes a WX issue in `OptoRuntime::handle_exception_C()`, wher

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-03-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 17:46:41 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote: > > A list of the bugs that our internal testing revealed so far: > > Are any of these blockers for integration? Some of them are to do with things > like features that aren't yet supported, and we can't fix what we can't see. I don't person

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-03-03 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 11:05:20 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> For platform files that were copied from other ports to this port, if the >> file wasn't >> changed I presume the copyright years are left alone. If the file required >> changes >> for this port, I expect the year to be updated to 2021. Ho

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v23]

2021-03-03 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 23:21:28 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > Note that `thread` can be NULL here if the signal handler is running in a > non-attached thread. If we then perform: > `ThreadWXEnable(WXMode new_mode, Thread* thread = NULL) : _thread(thread ? > thread : Thread::current()),` > we call Thre

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v18]

2021-02-25 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:36:10 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v8]

2021-02-15 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 06:24:13 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: >> **Description :** >> This is the implementation of [JEP 382 : New macOS Rendering >> Pipeline](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238361) >> It implements a Java 2D internal rendering pipeline for macOS using the >> Apple Metal API

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v7]

2021-02-15 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:30:51 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Changes requested by gziemski (Committer). > > I took a look at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8261408 and noticed > a startup time regression with the Metal rendering pipeline, so I dug a bit > and here is

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v7]

2021-02-15 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:55:47 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - Lanai PR#181 - 8261143 - aghaisas >> - Lanai PR#180 - 8261546 - jdv > > Chan

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v7]

2021-02-11 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:58:36 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> src/java.desktop/macosx/native/libawt_lwawt/java2d/metal/MTLLayer.m line 112: >> >>> 110: sourceSize:MTLSizeMake(self.buffer.width, >>> self.buffer.height, 1) >>> 111:

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v7]

2021-02-11 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:55:35 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - Lanai PR#181 - 8261143 - aghaisas >> - Lanai PR#180 - 8261546 - jdv >

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v7]

2021-02-11 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:51:57 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: >> **Description :** >> This is the implementation of [JEP 382 : New macOS Rendering >> Pipeline](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238361) >> It implements a Java 2D internal rendering pipeline for macOS using the >> Apple Metal API

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v4]

2021-02-10 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:45:37 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - Lanai PR#177 - 8261430 - aghaisas >> - Lanai PR#176 - 8261399 - jdv > > Marke

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v4]

2021-02-10 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:29:52 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: >> **Description :** >> This is the implementation of [JEP 382 : New macOS Rendering >> Pipeline](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238361) >> It implements a Java 2D internal rendering pipeline for macOS using the >> Apple Metal API.

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v3]

2021-02-10 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:40:46 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Changes requested by gziemski (Committer). > > I tried to code review the native implementation files, but Metal APIs is > brand new to me and it's been a long while since I worked with graphics API, > so I can&#

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v3]

2021-02-10 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 23:07:39 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Lanai PR#175 - 8261304 - aghaisas > > Changes requested by gziemski (Committer). I t

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v3]

2021-02-08 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:28:07 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: >> **Description :** >> This is the implementation of [JEP 382 : New macOS Rendering >> Pipeline](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238361) >> It implements a Java 2D internal rendering pipeline for macOS using the >> Apple Metal API.

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v3]

2021-02-08 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:28:07 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: >> **Description :** >> This is the implementation of [JEP 382 : New macOS Rendering >> Pipeline](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238361) >> It implements a Java 2D internal rendering pipeline for macOS using the >> Apple Metal API.

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v3]

2021-02-08 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:15:25 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> The file in `RenderPerfTest` should have a GPLv2 license header (no >> Classpath). I filed >> [JDK-8261273](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8261273) and also >> highlighted a couple examples below. &g

Re: RFR: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline [v3]

2021-02-08 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 00:53:08 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> Ajit Ghaisas has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Lanai PR#175 - 8261304 - aghaisas > > The file in `RenderPerfTest` should have a GPLv2 license header (no > Classpat

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-05 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:26:27 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Marked as reviewed by ihse (Reviewer). > >> I haven't got a MacOS AArch64 system right now. Is it possible to >> enable W^X in Linux in order to kick the tyres? > > I've just got rid of asserts that fired on Linux sometime :) As for W^X lik

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 22:09:58 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: >> Anton Kozlov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> support macos_aarch64 in hsdis > > src/hotspot/os_cpu/bsd_aarch64/os_bsd_aarch64.cpp line 363: > >> 361: add

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:01:15 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:01:15 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:01:15 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:01:15 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:01:15 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:01:15 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:01:15 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v10]

2021-02-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:01:15 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-02-03 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 23:13:12 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster wrote: >> No idea how to insert spaces and make text align :-( > > using ` ```c ` > https://docs.github.com/en/github/writing-on-github/creating-and-highlighting-code-blocks > > I was wrong about `SIGFPE` / `EXC_MASK_ARITHMETIC`, it's use

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-02-03 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 22:44:18 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Thanks for your questions Gerard. >> >>> Part of the comment said This work-around is not necessary for 10.5+, as >>> CrashReporter no longer intercedes on caught fatal signals. >> >>

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-02-03 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 22:17:02 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster wrote: >> To answer my own question, it seems that code is still needed on `x86_64` >> for `lldb` with `EXC_MASK_BAD_ACCESS` or we keep tripping over >> `EXC_BAD_ACCESS` >> >> Remaining questions: >> >> a) why we need `EXC_MASK_ARITHMET

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-02-03 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:04:18 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> See comment above about `gdb`, the same applies to `lldb` today. The AArch64 >> backend uses `SIGILL` (~= `EXC_MASK_BAD_INSTRUCTION`) to initiate a >> deoptimization. Without this change you cannot continue debuggin

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-02-03 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:23:16 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster wrote: >> src/hotspot/os/posix/signals_posix.cpp line 1297: >> >>> 1295: kern_return_t kr; >>> 1296: kr = task_set_exception_ports(mach_task_self(), >>> 1297: EXC_MASK_BAD_ACCESS | >>> EXC_MASK_BAD_INST

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-02-02 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 18:52:29 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Anton Kozlov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> support macos_aarch64 in hsdis > > Changes requested by gziemski (Committer). There we

Re: RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v9]

2021-02-02 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:59:08 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote: >> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port. >> >> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and >> windows/aarch64. >> >> Major changes are in: >> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the

Re: RFR: 8260193: Remove JVM_GetInterfaceVersion() and JVM_DTraceXXX [v2]

2021-02-02 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:10:58 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote: >> - JVM_GetInterfaceVersion() was used by "HotSpot Express" (HSX) which >> allowed the same JDK library to use different version of HotSpot. However, >> HSX is no longer supported so this API should be removed. >> - Implementations of APIs such a

Re: RFR: 8260193: Remove JVM_GetInterfaceVersion() and JVM_DTraceXXX [v2]

2021-02-02 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:54:42 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote: >> src/java.base/share/native/libjava/check_version.c line 33: >> >>> 31: DEF_JNI_OnLoad(JavaVM *vm, void *reserved) >>> 32: { >>> 33: return JNI_VERSION_1_2; >> >> This leaves an entire file with one trivial function implementation. Can we >

Re: RFR: 8260193: Remove JVM_GetInterfaceVersion() and JVM_DTraceXXX [v2]

2021-02-01 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:10:58 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote: >> - JVM_GetInterfaceVersion() was used by "HotSpot Express" (HSX) which >> allowed the same JDK library to use different version of HotSpot. However, >> HSX is no longer supported so this API should be removed. >> - Implementations of APIs such a

Re: RFR: 8260616: Removing remaining JNF dependencies in the java.desktop module [v2]

2021-02-01 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 18:31:23 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Phil Race has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> 8260616: Removing remaining JNF dependencies in the java.desktop modul > > Marked as r

Re: RFR: 8260616: Removing remaining JNF dependencies in the java.desktop module [v2]

2021-02-01 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 19:53:32 GMT, Phil Race wrote: >> src/java.desktop/macosx/native/libosxapp/JNIUtilities.m line 83: >> >>> 81: stringWithFileSystemRepresentation:chs length:len]; >>> 82: return result; >>> 83: } >> >> Why are we doing: >> >> `java_string -> chars -> NS

Re: RFR: 8260616: Removing remaining JNF dependencies in the java.desktop module [v2]

2021-02-01 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:24:05 GMT, Phil Race wrote: >> This completes the desktop module JNF removal >> >> * remove -framework JavaNativeFoundation from make files >> >> * remove #import from all >> source files. If needed add import of JNIUtilities.h to get jni.h >> definitions - better an

Re: RFR: 8260616: Removing remaining JNF dependencies in the java.desktop module

2021-01-29 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:57:09 GMT, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> This completes the desktop module JNF removal >> >> * remove -framework JavaNativeFoundation from make files >> >> * remove #import from all >> source files. If needed add import of JNIUtil

Re: RFR: 8260616: Removing remaining JNF dependencies in the java.desktop module

2021-01-29 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:30:21 GMT, Phil Race wrote: > This completes the desktop module JNF removal > > * remove -framework JavaNativeFoundation from make files > > * remove #import from all > source files. If needed add import of JNIUtilities.h to get jni.h definitions > - better anyway si

Re: RFR: 8246112: Remove build-time and run-time checks for clock_gettime and CLOCK_MONOTONIC [v5]

2021-01-21 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 05:24:09 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> We are now confident that we have build-time and runtime support for >> clock_gettime and CLOCK_MONOTONIC on all our OpenJDK supported POSIX >> platforms - see bug report for some more details on different OS. >> Consequently we can simp

Re: RFR: 8246112: Remove build-time and run-time checks for clock_gettime and CLOCK_MONOTONIC [v3]

2021-01-20 Thread Gerard Ziemski
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 01:53:03 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> We are now confident that we have build-time and runtime support for >> clock_gettime and CLOCK_MONOTONIC on all our OpenJDK supported POSIX >> platforms - see bug report for some more details on different OS. >> Consequently we can simp

Re: RFR: 8205197: Never default to using libc++ on Linux

2018-06-19 Thread Gerard Ziemski
Thank you for fixing this. > On Jun 18, 2018, at 7:36 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > 8205197: Never default to using libc++ on Linux > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/stlib-default/ > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205197 >

Re: RFR: JDK-8196724: Change macosx deployment target to 10.9

2018-04-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
hi Erik, Thanks for doing this. I like how you are using a narrow mechanism to turn off only those warnings that come up due to deprecated APIs. Just a quick verification question (not very familiar with the makefiles), in line like this: DISABLED_WARNINGS_clang := deprecated-declarations I

Re: RFR 8173715: Remove Flat Profiler

2017-08-23 Thread Gerard Ziemski
> On Aug 22, 2017, at 9:10 PM, David Holmes wrote: > > On 22/08/2017 11:36 PM, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Thank you for the review. >>> On Aug 21, 2017, at 8:01 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: >>> >>> Build changes look good. >>> >>> Don&#

Re: RFR 8173715: Remove Flat Profiler

2017-08-22 Thread Gerard Ziemski
talking about, can you point out the files you just referred to please? > > /Erik > > > On 2017-08-18 23:09, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> hi all, >> >> The FlatProfiler (i.e. -Xprof) has been deprecated in jdk9, and now it’s the >> time to remove the co

RFR 8173715: Remove Flat Profiler

2017-08-18 Thread Gerard Ziemski
hi all, The FlatProfiler (i.e. -Xprof) has been deprecated in jdk9, and now it’s the time to remove the code and obsolete the -Xprof flag. issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173715 jdk repo webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gziemski/8173715_rev2_repo/ hotspot webrev: h

Re: RFR: 8086005: Define __STDC_xxx_MACROS config macros globally via build system

2017-06-09 Thread Gerard Ziemski
hi Kim, I’m withdrawing my objection. Making this mechanism cover ldflags is beyond the scope of this fix and deserves its own feature request. cheers > On Jun 8, 2017, at 4:21 PM, Gerard Ziemski wrote: > > hi Kim, > > My understanding is that to enable c++11, for example,

Re: RFR: 8086005: Define __STDC_xxx_MACROS config macros globally via build system

2017-06-08 Thread Gerard Ziemski
hi Kim, My understanding is that to enable c++11, for example, we need to do 2 things (at least on Mac OS X): #1 For the compilation phase we need to add “-std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++”, where “-std=c++11” selects the language model, and “-stdlib=libc++” selects the corresponding headers. #2 For

Re: RFR(M) 8069540: Remove universal binaries support from hotspot build

2016-02-01 Thread Gerard Ziemski
Thank you for the review! > On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:12 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie > wrote: > > On 2016-01-29 18:04, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> (adding build-dev) >> >> Looks good enough to me. > > Looks good to me too. > > /Magnus > >> >&g

Re: RFR(M) 8069540: Remove universal binaries support from hotspot build

2016-02-01 Thread Gerard Ziemski
Thank you for the review! > On Jan 29, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > > (adding build-dev) > > Looks good enough to me. > > /Erik > > On 2016-01-29 17:51, Gerard Ziemski wrote: >> Hi all (and especially the makefiles experts), >> >>

Re: RFR (XS) 8033946 - Hotspot build should ignore "ide" folder

2014-09-05 Thread Gerard Ziemski
hi Bernhard, I will have to look into how I can make it available to the open source code community. cheers On 9/4/2014 4:16 PM, Bernhard Urban wrote: Hi Gerard, On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Gerard Ziemski mailto:gerard.ziem...@oracle.com>> wrote: For those interested,

Re: RFR (XS) 8033946 - Hotspot build should ignore "ide" folder

2014-09-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
what happens? I was a bit surprised to see a hotspot specific change? Also - can't you store your favorite IDE project outside of the repository? thanks, Karen On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Gerard Ziemski wrote: hi all, Please review a very small fix that makes hotspot build ignore &qu

RFR (XS) 8033946 - Hotspot build should ignore "ide" folder

2014-09-04 Thread Gerard Ziemski
hi all, Please review a very small fix that makes hotspot build ignore "ide" folder, which is where local users can store their own favorite IDE projects. For those interested, I have an Xcode project for JDK8 and JDK9 that I am personally actively supporting and using, which is hosted at h

Does anyone have an Xcode project to build Hotspot?

2013-02-21 Thread Gerard Ziemski
hi guys, I hope this is the right place to ask this question, if not please suggest where else I could ask it. Does anyone here have an Xcode project to build Hotspot? For reference, I have filed https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8007737 to track this issue. cheers