On 9/23/2021 11:00 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:53:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Now that OpenJDK has more or less complete `tier{1,2,3,4}` definitions, let's
mention them in `testing.md`.
Current patch is my braindump, I am open for suggestions :)
Aleksey Shipilev has
more time automating this will save any significant time.
Cheers,
Mikael
On Jun 5, 2019, at 2:40 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello,
Please have an early review the start-of-release builds updates for JDK 14
ahead of the upcoming fork:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/jdk14-fork.2/
U
Hello,
Please have an early review the start-of-release builds updates for JDK
14 ahead of the upcoming fork:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/jdk14-fork.2/
Unlike previous start-of-release changesets, this one also includes the
"symbol" data used by javac --release.
After the next JD
Hi Igor,
On 2/19/2019 5:54 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
Joe,
allowSmartActionArgs is opt-in if requiredVersion < b14, and opt-out
if requiredVersion >= b14, please see
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg/rev/36c592d2f544 . so you
don't have to have allowSmartActionArgs=true in 8219254.
Hello,
On 2/19/2019 5:06 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
Hi Erik,
thanks for your review.
we can't just bump the required version as it can introduce changes in tests'
behavior. requiredVersion >= 4.2 b14 will enable allowSmartActionArgs[1],
From what I understand from Jon, allowSmartActionArgs is
On 1/28/2019 8:16 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Isn't anything pushed to 12 (kindof) automatically pushed to 13 too,
eventually?
Yes; Jesper regularly syncs changes from 12 into 13. At times this
requires addressing merge conflicts, etc.
HTH,
-Joe
I believe both hg and git currently use SHA-1 hashes.
Should the syntax used in the release file be expanded to indicate which
SCM the hash is from?
Thanks,
-Joe
On 9/4/2018 3:00 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
There are several instances of OpenJDK source being hosted in Git
repositories instead
Ship it :-)
-Joe
On 2/5/2018 5:25 PM, David Holmes wrote:
It's time to increment the actual version to 11 for JDK 11.
Joe Darcy and I have worked through numerous test issues that delayed
the update and I've been addressing a number of issues in hotspot
related to obsolete/expired flag warni
Looks fine.
-Joe
On 12/19/2017 1:52 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Please review these changes to remove the remnants of javah (and in a
couple of tests, some remnants of apt and an earlier version of javap)
from the repo, now that the tool itself has been removed.
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.jav
together and with less
changes required.
Paul.
On 18 Dec 2017, at 17:33, Joseph D. Darcy <mailto:joe.da...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
A follow-up on defining a final field RELEASE_CURRENT as an alias
for the latest SourceVersion constant to allow easier updating of
annotation
Hello,
A follow-up on defining a final field RELEASE_CURRENT as an alias for
the latest SourceVersion constant to allow easier updating of
annotations using SourceVersion constants. Somewht surprisingly, this is
not legal Java code; an annotation must use an enum constant directly
and not a
Hi David,
Just pushed the change; if you refresh your forest it will be there.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 1/31/2017 5:41 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Joe,
On 1/02/2017 11:32 AM, joe darcy wrote:
Hi David,
I can apply my fix for JDK-8173383: Update JDK build to use -source and
-target 10.
That's exact
Hello,
With the opening of the JDK 10 forests, the build should be updated to
use the new source and target options (JDK-8028546:
Add -source 10 and -target 10 to javac)
Please review the changes for
JDK-8173383: Update JDK build to use -source and -target 10
http://cr.openjdk.java.ne
Hello,
As part of deprecating Class.newInstance (JDK-6850612), the client team
has requested to not @SuppressWarnings the uses of Class.newIntance in
the java.desktop module, but rather to let the client team perform a
fuller update to avoid the deprecated coding pattern (JDK-8155874).
Since
Looks fine; thanks,
-Joe
On 11/5/2015 2:11 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Please review this fix for the current build break in jdk9-dev. It
seems initializing variables to the empty string in shell requires
quotes.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141574
Patch:
diff -r 4ba1
Jon,
The actual file move looks fine to me.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 4/2/2015 4:52 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Sorry for the relatively wide distribution.
JDK-8076583 is a conceptually simple cleanup, to move the source file
for the jdk.Exported class from the langtools repo (where it is a
singleto
Hello,
As a continuation of the warnings effort, I'd like to see doclint
checking selectively enabled during the main build of the Java sources
in the jdk repo by javac.
As the name implies, the javac "-Xdoclint" argument enables structural
checking of javadoc comments by javac. For the java
Hello build gurus,
As a follow-up to clearing the jdk repo of warnings, I'd like to see how
many warnings are left in other repos.
To do this, I'd like to run the build of the other repos with
-Xlint:all -Xmaxwarns 1
I've poked around the build system a bit, but haven't found an effe
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/16 Andrew John Hughes :
2010/1/16 Joseph D. Darcy :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Ken Cavanaugh :
The fixes look good to me.
Thanks,
Ken.
On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Andrew John Hughes
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Ken Cavanaugh :
The fixes look good to me.
Thanks,
Ken.
On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
When building documentation, both OpenJDK6 and OpenJDK7 spit out a
number of warnings when building
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
When building documentation, both OpenJDK6 and OpenJDK7 spit out a
number of warnings when building documentation:
/mnt/builder/jdk6/impsrc/javax/rmi/PortableRemoteObject.java:171:
warning - Tag @link: reference not found: Stub#connect
/mnt/builder/jdk6/impsrc/org/omg/C
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/23 Kelly O'Hair :
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
[big snip]
DOH! Sorry...
Yes, these jaxp and jaxws forests can probably go away, we won't
be using them.
The cur
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
So I'm trying to work out some jdk7 Makefile performance improvements
and everything is working out fine on Linux and OpenSolaris...
Then I discover that the GNU make features I'm using are seriously
broken in GNU make 3.80 and I need 3.81 to get around it. :^(
Also it turns
I'll do some test builds myself on Friday.
-Joe
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Martin,
Comment noted. I'm now on vacation, so I'll look at this next week.
-- Jon
On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
It appears that ant is being invoked with "-Djavac.target=5", but not
with -Djava
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/8/10 Tim Bell :
No luck it seems...
[echo] Downloading from
https://jaxp.dev.java.net/files/documents/913/140275/jdk7-jaxp-m5.zip
[get] Getting:
https://jaxp.dev.java.net/files/documents/913/140275/jdk7-jaxp-m5.zip
[get] To:
/mnt/builder/openjdk.iced
Vinod Kutty wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build openjdk7-ea-b67, so I downloaded the
self-extracting binary plugs and tried to extract it.
You no longer need the binary plugs to perform an openjdk=true build.
-Joe
Unfortunately, it assumes a graphical environment for the license
agreement an
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
snip...
Given how well this model works for IcedTea working with OpenJDK, I'm
confident it can also work for the JDK's incorporation of corba, jaxp, and
jaxws :-)
Indeed, IcedTea already downloads a tarball of the HSX repository and
deletes the OpenJDK6 version.
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On May 15, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello.
Erik Trimble wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/5/15 Erik Trimble :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Hi all (especially Joe),
Now that the HotSpot Express repositories are available, what is the
plan for
Catching up on email,
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman :
Andrew Haley wrote:
[snip]
I'm not very familiar with IcedTea but I cloned the repository to see what
these patches are about. Here are a few comments:
icedtea-6728542-epoll.patch seems to be a change-set I push
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I'll get it.
Can someone in the OpenJDK commit list
(http://db.openjdk.java.net/people)
review this minor change for jdk6:
Approved.
-Joe
diff --git a/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
b/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
--- a/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
+++ b/make/java/j
Andrew Haley wrote:
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
So, we're going to have a serious attempt t
John Coomes wrote:
Andrew Haley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:38, Joe Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The source bundle for OpenJDK 6 build 14 is available for download from:
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/
The
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2008/6/23 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:43 -0700, David Herron wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
In my JavaOne talk Sandeep and I had worked up a hack with the same
purpose. He's been busy enough that he hadn't
I agree that having results of findbugs (and other checkers) as one of
the results of the build would be a good idea.
-Joe
Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
Since it takes so long time, how about the release engineer running it
once after every build and post the result to openjdk.java.net? Hope
some
34 matches
Mail list logo