OpenJDK build system might need to be adapted for Sun Solaris Sparc/SmartOS

Neomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>* | **Blog <http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com/>** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github <https://github.com/neomatrix369>* * | **LinkedIn <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>* *Come to Devoxx UK 2017:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!*

Re: OpenJDK ARM build not using all the CPU cores

Thanks Erik we applied that flag and it has picked up the cores, we wll see when the build finishes how much or how long it took to finish compared to our previous 1-3 hour builds. On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 at 11:09 Mani Sarkar wrote: > Thanks Erik, I have updated our scripts with this f

Re: OpenJDK ARM build not using all the CPU cores

; If you really want, you can override the settings with > > > > make JOBS=4 images > > > > Of course, YMMV due to the low amount of memory. > > > > Ioi > > > >> Mani Sarkar 於 2017年4月19日 下午4:07 寫道： > >> > >> Thanks Andrew for clari

Re: OpenJDK ARM build not using all the CPU cores

Thanks Andrew for clarifying. On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 at 08:56 Andrew Haley wrote: > On 19/04/17 08:42, Mani Sarkar wrote: > > Whilst build OpenJDK (latest version from > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/), we have noticed, that the > build > > system does not make

Fwd: OpenJDK ARM build not using all the CPU cores

+adoption-disc...@openjdk.java.net to the discussion -- Forwarded message - From: Mani Sarkar Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 at 08:42 Subject: OpenJDK ARM build not using all the CPU cores To: build-dev@openjdk.java.net , build-infra-...@openjdk.java.net Hi all, Whilst build OpenJDK

OpenJDK ARM build not using all the CPU cores

**LinkedIn <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>* *Come to Devoxx UK 2017:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!*

Re: Building Valhalla

Thanks guys I'll be happy to change it back when its rectified on your end. Cheers, Mani On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Hello Mani, > > Yes, it will, but consider it a workaround that may change. > > /Erik > > > On 2015-10-02 22:44, Man

Re: Building Valhalla

ake jimages > > afaik that should not run the last verification step ;-) > > Maurizio > > On 02/10/15 20:59, Mani Sarkar wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I get the below build error half way through build the valhalla build of >> OpenJDK: >> >&g

Building Valhalla

.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github <https://github.com/neomatrix369>* * | **LinkedIn <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>* *Come to Devoxx UK 2016:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!*

Re: FYI: Build system rewrite in Ant

-- @theNeomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>* | **Blog <http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com>** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket <

Re: Issues build OpenJDK8

cy of all kinds of network > troubles. In fact, my guess is that the intermittent failure you saw might > be due to an intermittent failure in the download or build of alsa. > > /Magnus > > 7 feb 2015 kl. 23:43 skrev Mani Sarkar : > > Hi Magnus, > > Thanks for getting b

Re: Issues build OpenJDK8

b/openjdk-1.8-linux-x86_64/107/consoleFull > ) > > /Magnus > > 7 feb 2015 kl. 13:42 skrev Mani Sarkar : > > Hi all, > > Although we are on OpenJDK9 and the AdoptOpenJDK build farms are already > producing binaries for it, we also have OpenJDK8 jobs that run occasionally

Issues build OpenJDK8

*Blog <http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com>** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github <https://github.

Re: README-builds.html update

have to run that manually when we change the .md file. (Judging > by the frequency of updates to the README file in the past, this is not > likely to be very often. :-/) I can write that part. > > /Magnus > > -- @theNeomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>* |

Re: Build error with javac Main not being found when building java.transaction module on Mac OS X

*LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github <https://github.com/neomatrix369>* * | **LinkedIn <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>* *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!*

Re: OpenJDK9 - build errors on Linux/Ubuntu 12.04

, > > I don't think your problem was the same as Martin's. Recloning might be a > good idea still. > > /Erik > > On 2014-08-25 12:06, Mani Sarkar wrote: > > I;m building jdk9/jdk9 - as always (is that not the right forest) and yes > its getting the latest chang

Re: OpenJDK9 - build errors on Linux/Ubuntu 12.04

at 7:18 PM, David Holmes > wrote: > >> cc'ing hotspot-dev >> >> Which forest are you trying to build and is it fully up to date? >> >> David >> >> >> On 23/08/2014 9:10 AM, Mani Sarkar wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >

OpenJDK9 - build errors on Linux/Ubuntu 12.04

ket <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github <https://github.com/neomatrix369>* * | **LinkedIn <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>* *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!*

Re: Building on Mac (David DeHaven)

Hi, The OpenJDK adopters in the community have been testing out the steps lately to build OpenJDK on the MacOS and so far things are fine, we didn't need to install MacPort or have major issues with the Mac. You can have a look at the steps if these help with your issues: http://java.net/projects

Re: Hotspot - kind of build and how to detect?

Thanks David I will take it from here, I have found a couple of work-arounds to the below. Cheers, mani On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:16 PM, David Holmes wrote: > On 16/02/2013 12:09 AM, Mani Sarkar wrote: > >> I have written a bash script which looks for gamma, but gamma can be >

Re: Hotspot - kind of build and how to detect?

, Mani On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:06 AM, David Holmes wrote: > On 15/02/2013 10:55 AM, Mani Sarkar wrote: > >> Hi all again, >> >> I did some searching in the OpenJDK folders and found the below notations: >> >> *$(CONF_NAME)* in the below line in one of the make fi

Re: OpenJDK builds: Ant build issues with jdk (netbeans) sub-projects - awt2d, j2se and jarzip

make progress with these builds using the new build system. Thanks. Regards, Mani On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Mani Sarkar wrote: > Hi All, > > I have furthered my pursuits with building *OpenJDK projects *by building > the JDK sub-projects like swing, etc... but came across issue

OpenJDK builds: Ant build issues with jdk (netbeans) sub-projects - awt2d, j2se and jarzip

Hi All, I have furthered my pursuits with building *OpenJDK projects *by building the JDK sub-projects like swing, etc... but came across issues with building 3 different projects which I wasn't able to build due configuration issues. These sub-projects are located under the netbeans subfolder und

Building OpenJDK projects and JTReg in Eclipse

Hi, I have recently posted a couple of blogs on How to Build OpenJDK projects and JTReg in Eclipse and have received good feedback on the content. But I would still like it to be reviewed by groups that work in this area regularly to give expert opinion and advise on it. Please have a look at the