Re: RFR: 8246436: JFR: Avoid parsing metadata.xml during startup

ntime[1] This is pretty awesome! Cheers, Mario -- Mario Torre Associate Manager, Software Engineering Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com> 9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30 9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898

Re: JDK 16 RFR of JDK-8235496 : "Start of release updates for JDK 16" and related work

ates were as expected; the symbol information for JDK 15 > was extracted from JDK 15 b24. This may be updated to a later build for > initial inclusion in JDK 16. > > Related review threads started on compiler-dev and hotspot dev. > > Thanks, > > -Joe > > [1] http://openjdk.

Re: Supported platforms

ust tell us what you are interested in contributing and see if there are objections or other reasons not to have that code in. Cheers, Mario -- Mario Torre Associate Manager, Software Engineering Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com> 9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30 9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898

Re: Building hsdis?

2017-12-29 17:16 GMT+01:00 Volker Simonis : > So than why aren't you reluctant about using hsdis itself? Or did you > (or your co-workers) never ever used any hsdis version based on > binutils > 2.17, released in June 2006 (small hint: aarch64 support > was added in

Re: Building hsdis?

> builds hsdis violates the GNU license because he > combines GPLv2 with GPLv3 code Are those files GPL 2 only or “at your option any later version” too? Indeed, GPL v2 and v3 are not compatible, but if the upgradability is allowed then the effective version is already 3. The rest of the openjdk

Re: OpenJDK build system might need to be adapted for Sun Solaris Sparc/SmartOS

2017-05-31 13:50 GMT+02:00 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de>: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:33:13PM +0200, Mario Torre wrote: >> > Ok, so I signed the OCA and sent in three patches to address build >> > issues on Linux/sparcv9. Those patches were

Re: OpenJDK build system might need to be adapted for Sun Solaris Sparc/SmartOS

2017-05-31 12:44 GMT+02:00 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:00:59PM +0200, dalibor topic wrote: >> It's not very complicated. Please see http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/ >> for general details. >> >> When it comes to ports to new platforms,

Re: problem building JDK 9 on macOS 10.12.4

Did you pass the --with-freetype explicitly to configure? Cheers, Mario 2017-04-30 5:40 GMT+02:00 Alan Snyder : > I just updated from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9 > and ran into the following build > problem on macOS

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

For what is worth, I agree. Cheers, Mario On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 at 17:37, wrote: > Hi, > > I use the OpenJDK NetBeans project most of the time and am very happy with > it. I still think Mikael's initiative is a very good one since I don't > believe in forcing

Re: build and ccache

2016-04-18 19:10 GMT+02:00 Maurizio Cimadamore : > Hi, > I seem to be running into ccache issues very frequently lately; basically, > every time I do a reconfigure (because the build tells me to do so after a > repo refresh), I'm typically not able to build after >

Re: Provide zipped javadoc archive from make

Hi Erik, Jiri, We filed a bug report for this and I pushed the changes: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154313 Cheers, Mario On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Mario Torre <neug...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Jiri Vanek <jva...@redhat.com> wro

Re: Silence warnings with new GCC

2015-11-26 20:37 GMT+01:00 Lindenmaier, Goetz : > Hi Andrew, > > I know about this problem ... I guess a change of mine causes these warnings. > While I found a row of good fixes, these with ShouldNotReachHere are annoying. > > What you propose has been discussed in

Re: FYI: Build system rewrite in Ant

2015-04-01 10:33 GMT+02:00 Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com: The build system currently uses make to build OpenJDK. This is a technology that has been around for decades, and in places this legacy clearly shows. An alternative build tool, Ant, is based on cutting-edge

Re: FYI: Build system rewrite in Ant

2015-04-01 12:18 GMT+02:00 James Laskey james.las...@oracle.com: I may have been misled, but I thought Ant was replaced by a non-deterministic build system called Termight. :) I think that indeed Ant is obsolete already, and since we are in the space exploration era, this may be more

Re: FYI: Build system rewrite in Ant

2015-04-01 11:59 GMT+02:00 Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com: I'm personally willing to provide a ANT to MAVEN conversion tool which will allow for a more verbose an rdable build system. It will also ensure that dependencies are always downloaded at all times ensuring network pipes are

Re: Fwd: Re: RFR(xxs): 8072935: Fix missing newline at end of file after 8067447

2015-02-12 14:27 GMT+01:00 Volker Simonis volker.simo...@gmail.com: Hi, I don't think we should enforce a minimum Version for GCC (actually we would have to enforce an exact version because the master builds at Oracle are only tested with exactly one compiler version - see

Re: OJDK on RHEL 6.5

Not sure if you tried that as well, but there's an handy helper on RHEL: yum-builddep java-1.7.0-openjdk I thought I mentioned here for future references. The README-build.html mentions that as well, btw. As Stanislav also pointed installing the source RPM will bring all the buildtime deps.

Re: OJDK on RHEL 6.5

2014-10-20 17:07 GMT+02:00 Dave Pointon point...@gmail.com: TFT MArio , Sure, np. Maybe it was just me, but I (obviously wrongly) expected it to be as smooth easy as it was for my original l/t build - which was ubuntu 12.04. The build system is the same for all distributions really

Re: Le roi est mort, vive le roi!

Oh, I can't find the I Like button anywhere in the mailer :) Cheers, Mario 2013/11/18 Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed. The patch was just submitted to the tl forest, from where it will move to master in a few

Re: Removal of the old build system, partial and preliminary review (part 3)

You can probably use hg mv -A too, then webrev should pick it up whatever mercurial prepared in the change set. Cheers, Mario Il 04/nov/2013 18:46 Phil Race philip.r...@oracle.com ha scritto: I had this problem recently and I don't think you need restore the files - just the directory. I used

Re: jdk8 build times

That's s feature, not a bug! :) http://xkcd.com/303/ (Sorry, I couldn't resist) Cheers, Mario Il giorno 02/ago/2013 22:26, Pete Brunet peter.bru...@oracle.com ha scritto: FWIW I just built 32 bit jdk8 release on 64 bit win 7 with cygwin 1.7.21 on a dual core 8 GB 2.53 GHz Lenovo T500 and the

Re: Windows configure issues

I fully agree with this point of view. I don't think that this conflict with the idea of a wiki companion, this can be done and surely would be of help, but copy-paste instructions should be with the code. I also think that since we need to keep in sync the readme with the wiki, the problem with

Re: New official README-builds.html

2013/3/18 Andrew Hughes gnu.and...@redhat.com: Depends how many distros you intend to support. Well, I guess that if somebody doesn't use one between rhel/fedora/suse/ubuntu/mint/debian than most likely will figure out the exact commands anyway, I think those are still good suggestions to keep

Re: webrev failure?

Il giorno 11/ago/2012, alle ore 18:04, Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi all, Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm assuming that the webrev tool falls under this domain somewhat. In order to get patches into the OpenJDK as cleanly as possible,

Re: Need reviewers, web page changes

Il giorno lun, 25/07/2011 alle 09.47 -0700, Kelly O'Hair ha scritto: Includes changes to use get_source.sh and hgforest.sh rather than the Forest Extension and the fclone/fstatus/fupdate/ffetch/fpush/fpull commands. Also added NetBeans project files (so I can use the NetBeans html editor).

Re: Project Proposal: Build Infrastructure Changes

Il giorno lun, 25/04/2011 alle 13.07 -0700, Erik Trimble ha scritto: Cmake sounds very promising. I would certainly think it merits a discussion of usefulness. The major barrier I'd say is that it would require us to do a forklift replacement of the existing gmake Makefile build system.

_LITTLE_ENDIAN

some other little places. I need to prepare a patch for that, but before I would like to have some suggestion or if you are not interested at all, I'll just fix the specific code that we use and not care about all the references. Cheers, Mario -- Mario Torre, Software Developer, http

Re: AWT Dev [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] _LITTLE_ENDIAN

company, now). Cheers, Mario -- Mario Torre, Software Developer, http://www.jroller.com/neugens/ aicas Allerton Interworks Computer Automated Systems GmbH Haid-und-Neu-Straße 18 * D-76131 Karlsruhe * Germany http://www.aicas.com * Tel: +49-721-663 968-44 pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key

Re: AWT Dev [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] _LITTLE_ENDIAN

remember it? Roman, maybe we should introduce some big macro instead ;) In any case, I agree this is my problem, there is nothing wrong in the JDK code, I just think it would be more portable with this refactored a bit. Cheers, Mario -- Mario Torre, Software Developer, http://www.jroller.com

Re: Swing Dev Request for review: Bug 100054: Make building the Nimbus look 'n' feel optional

for distributions to have this package in (I personally don't care, I have secured the 4 magics jars and this is all I need :) Cheers, Mario -- Mario Torre, Software Developer, http://www.jroller.com/neugens/ aicas Allerton Interworks Computer Automated Systems GmbH Haid-und-Neu-Straße 18 * D-76131

Re: Recommended GCC version?

Il giorno lun, 31/03/2008 alle 18.37 +0200, Clemens Eisserer ha scritto: Hello, I wonder which version of GCC is recommended for building OpenJDK? 4.3 will probably not work out-of-the-box, should I downgrade to 4.2 or 4.1? Some time ago I developed using the closed java-source, and I had