Re: Building on Mac

2013-03-17 Thread Peter Zhelezniakov
On Mar 18, 2013, at 3:41 AM, David Holmes wrote: > Are you trying to build OpenJDK or Oracle JDK? Oracle JDK -- I have jdk/make/closed and jdk/src/closed. I've parsed the output of --debug-configure, and realised I need the --enable-macosx-runtime-support option. With this option, configure req

Building on Mac

2013-03-15 Thread Peter Zhelezniakov
Hello, I'm trying to build jdk8 on Mac, cannot get past the configuration step. First configure asked for X11, which I believe is not needed on Mac. I worked around with --x-libraries. Then it stumbled upon freetype, which it should not need either. I added --with-freetype, but it failed to reco

Re: Request for review: Bug 100054: Make building the Nimbus look 'n' feel optional

2009-05-15 Thread Peter Zhelezniakov
Mark Reinhold wrote: Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:01 -0700 From: jonathan.gibb...@sun.com Yeah, tried that, didn't work for me; I had to do real work so I gave up and downloaded and went back to using 0.9.5. :-( Odd. I've been hacking on Jigsaw using hg 1.1.2 on my Ubuntu 9.04 box, with the

Re: Request for review: Bug 100054: Make building the Nimbus look 'n' feel optional

2009-05-15 Thread Peter Zhelezniakov
Andrew Haley wrote: We are not in a position to dictate to a user exactly which version of JIBX will be installed on their system. Therefore, if JIBX is now a dependency of OpenJDK we'll have to find a way to make OpenJDK work with whatever versions of JIBX people choose. To make it clear: JIB

Re: Request for review: Bug 100054: Make building the Nimbus look 'n' feel optional

2009-05-15 Thread Peter Zhelezniakov
Kirill Grouchnikov wrote: > Oh, and if we have somehow become dependent upon a third-party tool > (JIBX) that's so difficult to locate and has such a low commitment to > interface stability, then perhaps we should reconsider that and use a > different tool. The decision to remove this tool f