On Wed, 19 May 2021 03:37:11 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
>> This PR contains Short Vector Math Library support related changes for
>> [JEP-414 Vector API (Second Incubator)](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/414),
>> in preparation for when targeted.
>>
>> Intel Short Vector Math Library (SVM
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:48:55 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> We have a handful of assembly files in the JDK. They have long been left
>> aside, with a "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" attitude.
>>
>> In the current panama-vector, there is a lot more assembly files incoming,
>> including f
ized configuration built there.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 2020-11-16 19:33, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
Hi all,
Could you please review this small and trivial patch which adds
`linux-x64-optimized` build to submit workflow so breakages of this
build flavor would be easier to spot?
Thanks,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:31:24 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> [8256414](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256414) / #1233 added
> similar profile to submit workflow, this patch defines `linux-x64-optimized`
> profile in jib-profile so it can be used by mach5 and added to tie
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:26:18 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could you please review this small and trivial patch which adds
> `linux-x64-optimized` build to submit workflow so breakages of this build
> flavor would be easier to spot?
>
> Thanks,
> -- Igor
Thanks a lot, Igor! Looks g
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:40:51 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> We shipped Ahead-of-Time compilation (the jaotc tool) in JDK 9, as an
> experimental feature. We shipped Graal as an experimental JIT compiler in JDK
> 10. We haven't seen much use of these features, and the effort required to
> suppor
Vladimir, if you're okay with it I'd like to propose this as a patch to
the problem instead:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8217404-fix-multiple-disabled-jvm-features/webrev.01
Looks good! I verified that it fixes the bug.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On Jan 18, 2019,
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8217404/webrev.01
Verified that it works as expected on Linux, Windows, MacOS, and Solaris.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 18/01/2019 16:39, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Thanks, Igor.
overall your fix looks reasonable, but w/ it we can get
this case you will
need to revert your changes in 'if test ...' lines
I'm in favor of using "-w" and I see different grep flags being used
already, but would like somebody from Build team confirm they are OK
with such solution.
Best regards,
Vladimir Iva
nternal.vm.ci should be built... yes
checking if graal module jdk.internal.vm.compiler should be built... yes
checking if aot should be enabled... yes
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 1/18/19 3:33 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8217404/webrev.00/
https://bugs.ope
aal module jdk.internal.vm.compiler should be built... no,
forced
checking if aot should be enabled... no, forced
...
(The fix doesn't address the case when one feature has a name which is a
proper substring of another feature, but there are no such cases at the
moment.)
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8209611/webrev.02/index.html
Reviewed.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On Aug 20, 2018, at 11:07 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
It has been discussed (not widely enough and I accept that) in 8209547 and the
related email thread b/w JC(cc'ed) and m
Thanks, Magnus! That works for me.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 12/1/17 11:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
You cannot disable features. However, you can create your own complete
set of features. Use --with-jvm-variants=custom. The custom variant
starts out with a comletely empty set of
Hi,
I'm curious is there a way to disable JVM features from the default list.
Configure mentions --with-jvm-features [1], but it doesn't allow to
remove features which are enabled by default (tried to override the
list, but it didn't work).
Thanks!
Best regards,
Vladimir Iva
Looks good!
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 8/1/17 5:32 AM, David Buck wrote:
Hi!
It was suggested that I also loop in build-dev to the review of this
proposed change.
Cheers,
-Buck
On 2017/07/31 22:06, David Buck wrote:
Hi!
Would you please review this small set of very simple build
JDK changes looks good!
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 1/27/16 4:55 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Hi again,
This is a formal pre-integration review thread for JEP 280 ("Indify
String Concatenation") integration:
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/280
The JEP is Targeted, the CCC i
Looks good.
Thanks for fixing it!
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 10/30/15 3:51 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Here is a new patch for this where I did some more cleanup.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8141051/webrev.01/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141051
x27;t found how to enumerate only JDK modules:
Thanks!
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
[1] diff --git a/make/Main.gmk b/make/Main.gmk
--- a/make/Main.gmk
+++ b/make/Main.gmk
@@ -452,6 +452,8 @@
test-make: clean-test-make
+ build-test-lib: $(JAVA_TARGETS)
+
build-test-hotspot-jtreg-n
18 matches
Mail list logo
