[Fwd: Please review fix for 6819847 [Re: [Fwd: Problems with building jmx for OpenJDK.]]]

2009-03-31 Thread Tim Bell
review fix for 6819847 [Re: [Fwd: Problems with building jmx for OpenJDK.]] Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:08:41 -0700 From: Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com Kelly O'Hair wrote: I didn't think openjdk7 could build without binary plugs. But I've been a bit disconnected from the jdk work lately. [... snip

Re: [Fwd: Please review fix for 6819847 [Re: [Fwd: Problems with building jmx for OpenJDK.]]]

2009-03-31 Thread Andrew John Hughes
Original Message Subject: Please review fix for 6819847 [Re: [Fwd: Problems with building jmx for OpenJDK.]] Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:08:41 -0700 From: Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com Kelly O'Hair wrote: I didn't think openjdk7 could build without binary plugs. But I've been a bit

Re: [Fwd: Please review fix for 6819847 [Re: [Fwd: Problems with building jmx for OpenJDK.]]]

2009-03-31 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/3/31 Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com: Kelly O'Hair wrote: I didn't think openjdk7 could build without binary plugs. But I've been a bit disconnected from the jdk work lately. Andrew John Hughes wrote: I didn't either.  The last build I tried using the hotspot-comp tree (to test a patch

Re: [Fwd: Please review fix for 6819847 [Re: [Fwd: Problems with building jmx for OpenJDK.]]]

2009-03-31 Thread Tim Bell
Andrew John Hughes wrote: ERROR: Can't locate pre-built libraries. Please check your access to /NOT-SET/re/jdk/1.7.0/promoted/latest/openjdk/binaryplugs/linux-amd64 and/or check your value of ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH. Good to know it is in the queue though, as I was going